Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2020, Vol. 2 Issue (1): 97-104    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
某地下防空洞对拉锚式排桩围护结构基坑的影响
万先逵1,魏度强2*,荆永波3,何小辉1,石钰锋1,2
1. 南昌轨道交通集团有限公司, 江西 南昌 330013;2. 华东交通大学江西省岩土工程基础设施安全与控制重点实验室, 江西 南昌 330013;3. 中铁十四局集团隧道工程有限公司, 山东 济南 250000
The influence of an underground shelter on the foundation pit of the pull-anchor pile row retaining structure
WAN Xiankui1, WEI Duqiang2*, JING Yongbo3, HE Xiaohui1, SHI Yufeng1,2
1. Nanchang Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd., Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering Safety and Control of Jiangxi Province, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China;
3. Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., China Railway 14th Bureau Group, Jinan 250000, Shandong, China
下载:  PDF (6061KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 以景德镇某基坑工程临近一地下防空洞为依托,利用MIDAS软件建立有限元模型对基坑开挖过程进行模拟,并将模拟结果与监测数据进行对比分析,验证了有限元模型的准确性。对拉锚式基坑围护结构土压力、位移、内力进行研究,并通过对比不同水平距离地下防空洞对围护结构变形的影响,得到了地下防空洞的影响范围。研究结果表明:有防空洞时,桩后土压力会出现减小继而增大的趋势,在防空洞拱顶处土压力开始减小,底部开始增大,其土压力较无防空洞时减小了55 kPa;当基坑开挖至防空洞埋深时,围护桩最大水平位移较无防空洞时减小15%,防空洞对基坑的影响范围大致为2.5D(D为防空洞直径);随着基坑开挖,桩体最大弯矩点以及反弯点均会出现下移的趋势,且最大弯矩会随开挖深度的增大而增大,当开挖达到防空洞埋深时,有防空洞工况较无防空洞时最大弯矩增大20%。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
万先逵
魏度强
荆永波
何小辉
石钰锋
关键词:  拉锚式基坑  地下防空洞  有限元  内力  变形  土压力    
Abstract: Based on a foundation pit project in Jingdezhen near an underground shelter, a finite element model was established using MIDAS software to simulate the excavation process of the foundation pit. The simulation results were compared with monitoring data to verify the accuracy of the finite element model. On this basis, the earth pressure, displacement and internal force of the anchoring structure of the pull-anchor foundation pit were studied, and the influence range of the underground shelter was obtained by comparing the influence of different horizontal distance underground shelters on the deformation of the supporting structure. The results of the study indicated that the earth pressure behind the pile would decrease and then increase when there was an air-raid shelter. The earth pressure at the top of the air-raid shelter began to decrease and the bottom began to increase 55 kPa; when the foundation pit was excavated to the depth of the air-raid shelter, the maximum horizontal displacement value of the enclosing pile was reduced by 15% compared with that without the air-raid shelter, the influence range of underground shelter on the foundation pit was about 2.5D(D is the diameter of the underground shelter). Both the maximum bending moment point and the reverse bending point would show a downward trend, and the maximum bending moment value would increase with the increase of the excavation depth. The maximum bending moment was increased by 20%.
Key words:  pull anchor foundation pit    underground air raid    finite element    internal force    deformation    earth pressure
                    发布日期:  2020-07-07      期的出版日期:  2020-03-20
中图分类号:  TU94  
作者简介:  万先逵(1969— ),男,江西进贤人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为地铁管理. E-mail:794248239@qq.com. *通信作者简介:魏度强(1997— ),男,江西南昌人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为隧道及地下工程. E-mail:2416911448@qq.com
引用本文:    
万先逵,魏度强,荆永波,何小辉,石钰锋. 某地下防空洞对拉锚式排桩围护结构基坑的影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(1): 97-104.
WAN Xiankui, WEI Duqiang, JING Yongbo, HE Xiaohui, SHI Yufeng. The influence of an underground shelter on the foundation pit of the pull-anchor pile row retaining structure. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2020, 2(1): 97-104.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2020/V2/I1/97
[1] 王智勇. 桩锚支护体系的内力和位移分析[D].兰州:兰州理工大学,2008. WANG Zhiyong. Analysis of internal force and displacement of pile-anchor support system[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2008.
[2] 李峰. 桩锚土钉复合支护基坑施工时变力学研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2010. LI Feng. Time-varying mechanics study of foundation pit composite support pile foundation[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2010.
[3] 胡贺松. 深基坑桩锚支护结构稳定性及受力变形特性研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2009. HU Hesong. Study on stability and deformation characteristics of pile-anchor retaining structure in deep foundation pit[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2009.
[4] 李浩,宋园园,周军,等.深基坑桩锚支护结构受力与变形特性现场试验[J].地下空间与工程学报,2017,13(1):264-270. LI Hao, SONG Yuanyuan, ZHOU Jun, et al. Field test of stress and deformation characteristics of pile-anchor support structure in deep foundation pit[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017, 13(1):264-270.
[5] 张钦喜,樊绍峰,周予启.深基坑桩锚支护侧土压力反分析及数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增刊1):3214-3220. ZHANG Qinxi, FAN Shaofeng, ZHOU Yuqi. Reverse analysis and numerical simulation of earth pressure on pile-anchor support in deep foundation pit[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(Suppl.1):3214-3220.
[6] 李兵, 嵇凤颖. 盾构隧道施工对邻近深基坑的影响分析[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 34(4):639-644. LI Bing, JI Fengying. Influence of shield tunneling on adjacent deep foundation pit[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 34(4):639-644.
[7] 戴轩,徐管应,霍海峰,等.管廊隧道开挖对上覆在建深基坑影响的三维有限元分析[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(增刊1):21-24. DAI Xuan, XU Guanying, HUO Haifeng, et al.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of tunnel excavation on the deep foundation pit under construction[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(Suppl.1): 21-24.
[8] CHANG C T, SUN C W, DUANN S W, et al. Response of a Taipei Rapid Transit System(TRTS)tunnel to adjacent excavation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(3):151-158.
[9] 何连昇,何春茂,张俊.基坑开挖对下卧盾构隧道的影响风险分析[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2015,31(1):62-70. HE Liansheng, HE Chunmao, ZHANG Jun. Risk analysis of the impact of foundation pit excavation on the underlying shield tunnel[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 31(1): 62-70.
[10] 郭健,刘国彬,苏维捷,等.群坑效应下已建地下结构对紧邻基坑开挖变形的影响[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2019,35(2):222-230. GUO Jian, LIU Guobin, SU Weijie, et al. Numerical analysis about influence from the subsurface structure on adjacent deep excavation in foundation pit group[J]. Journal of Shenyang University of Architecture(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 35(2): 222-230.
[11] 张瑞金,胡奇凡.摩尔库伦和修正摩尔库伦本构有限元模拟结果对比分析[J].中国房地产业,2015(8):256-258. ZHANG Ruijin, HU Qifan. Comparative analysis of the finite element simulation results of Moore Cullen and modified Mooren Coulomb[J]. China Real Estate Industry, 2015(8):256-258.
[1] 张建,梁庆国,王永刚,庞小冲. 黄土隧道底鼓机理分析与防治技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(1): 84-90.
[2] 余海岁, 庄培芝. 岩土介质小孔收缩理论及其在隧道工程中的应用[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(4): 13-32.
[3] 刘润,黄旋智,袁宇,马鹏程. 土体弱化对海上风电单桩基础的影响研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(4): 56-63.
[4] 付俊生. 隧道围岩变形预测及趋势判断方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(4): 103-108.
[5] 张治国, 张洋彬, 王志伟, 方蕾, 马少坤, 师敏之, 魏纲. 类矩形截面隧道开挖诱发邻近管线变形模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(4): 85-96.
[6] 王复明,李斌,方宏远. 含脱空、腐蚀病害地下管道高聚物注浆修复试验与数值研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 1-8.
[7] 李福豪. 水泥加固海相软土的特征强度[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 9-13.
[8] 陈建勋,罗彦斌. 大跨度黄土公路隧道结构稳定性及控制技术研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 93-101.
[9] 李天斌,巫晨笛,孟陆波,高美奔. 隧道坍方动态分析与综合预警方法研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 111-118.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn