Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (3): 31-44    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.03.04
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
济南黄河隧道智慧防灾系统架构研究及验证
段跃鑫1,陈昕2*,沈奕2,张忆3,4,闫治国2
1. 济南城市建设集团有限公司, 山东 济南 250014;2. 同济大学土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系, 上海 200092; 3. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430063;4. 水下隧道技术国家地方联合工程研究中心, 湖北 武汉430063
Research and validation of the intelligent disaster prevention system for the Jinan Yellow River Tunnel
Duan Yuexin1, Chen Xin2*, Shen Yi2, Zhang Yi3,4, Yan Zhiguo2
1. Jinan City Construction Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China;
4. National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Underwater Tunnelling Technology, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China
下载:  PDF (13045KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对长大穿黄隧道环境状态难以综合感知、火灾发展态势难以动态掌握以及应急疏散决策依赖固定预案等问题,提出一种面向复杂隧道场景的智慧防灾方法,构建由环境参数感知、火情监控预警、火灾态势重构和动态应急疏散组成的隧道智慧防灾系统。首先,融合隧道环境监测数据与短时交通预测结果,建立基于模糊控制的综合污染评价与通风辅助调控方法。其次,构建基于多源监测数据融合的火情监控预警模型,利用GA-BP(genetic algorithm-backpropagation)神经网络识别明火、阴燃火及非火灾状态,并结合分级决策方法形成火情预警指令。在此基础上,利用长短期记忆网络挖掘温度时序数据与火灾演化参数之间的映射关系,动态预测火源位置和热释放速率等关键火情信息。进一步结合多智能体疏散仿真方法,综合考虑烟气、能见度、有毒气体及人员行为等因素,生成随火场环境和人员分布动态更新的疏散方案。以济南黄河隧道为工程背景开展系统构建与验证。结果表明,火情监控预警模型在典型模拟工况下较传统温差阈值方法提前约20 s达到报警判据,LSTM(long short-term memory)模型在温度数据完整和部分高温测点数据缺失条件下,热释放速率(heat release rate, HRR)预测决定系数分别达到95.9%和93.7%,16组典型疏散工况的总疏散时间为654~780 s。研究结果表明,该系统能够实现环境状态感知、火情预警、态势重构与动态疏散决策的连续联动,可为复杂隧道智慧防灾系统建设和火灾应急管理提供工程参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
段跃鑫
陈昕
沈奕
张忆
闫治国
关键词:  济南黄河隧道  智慧防灾  火灾预警  火灾态势重构  动态疏散    
Abstract: An intelligent disaster prevention system for complex tunnel scenarios was developed to improve environmental perception, fire monitoring, situation reconstruction, and emergency evacuation in long underwater river-crossing tunnels. The system consisted of four functional modules: environmental-parameter perception, fire monitoring and early warning, fire situation reconstruction, and dynamic evacuation. Environmental monitoring and ventilation regulation were conducted using a fuzzy-control-based method. A GA-BP(genetic algorithm-backpropagation)neural network was employed for fire early warning through multi-source data fusion, while a long short-term memory(LSTM)network was used to predict the fire source location and heat release rate(HRR). A multi-agent model was introduced to generate dynamic evacuation strategies, with smoke propagation, visibility, toxic gases, and occupant movement characteristics taken into consideration.The proposed system was validated using the Jinan Yellow River Tunnel as the engineering background. The results showed that the fire warning model reached the warning criterion approximately 20 s earlier than the conventional temperature-difference threshold method. The LSTM model achieved coefficients of determination(R2)of 95.9% and 93.7% for HRR prediction under complete data and partial high-temperature sensor failure conditions, respectively. The total evacuation time for 16 typical evacuation scenarios ranged from 654 to 780 s. The effectiveness of the proposed system in continuous and coordinated environmental perception, fire warning, situation reconstruction, and dynamic evacuation decision-making was demonstrated through the validation.The proposed framework was considered to provide an engineering reference for intelligent disaster prevention and emergency management in complex tunnels.
Key words:  Jinan Yellow River Tunnel    intelligent disaster prevention    fire early warning    fire situation reconstruction    dynamic evacuation
发布日期:  2026-10-12     
中图分类号:  U45  
  U491  
基金资助: 济南济泺路穿黄隧道工程科研资助项目(TSYSDY-JLLCHSD[2020]-07)
作者简介:  段跃鑫(1987— ),男,山东济南人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为工程技术管理. E-mail:527665281@qq.com. *通信作者简介:陈昕(1999— ),男,安徽淮南人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为隧道火灾防治. E-mail:cxin99@tongji.edu.cn
引用本文:    
段跃鑫,陈昕,沈奕,张忆,闫治国. 济南黄河隧道智慧防灾系统架构研究及验证[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 31-44.
Duan Yuexin, Chen Xin, Shen Yi, Zhang Yi, Yan Zhiguo. Research and validation of the intelligent disaster prevention system for the Jinan Yellow River Tunnel. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(3): 31-44.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I3/31
[1] 郭志国, 李益锌, 周令剑, 等. 公路隧道火灾应急技术研究现状与展望[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 13-24. Guo Zhiguo, Li Yixin, Zhou Lingjian, et al. Current situation and prospect of fire emergency technology research in highway tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(2): 13-24.
[2] 李岩, 蓝翎源, 单宇, 等. 基于BKA的电缆隧道烟雾探测系统优化布置方法[J/OL]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2025-06-19. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/10.1999.TM.20250618.1757.002 Li Yan, Lan Lingyuan, Shan Yu, et al. A optimized layout method for smoke detection systems in cable tunnels based on BKA[J/OL]. Journal of North China Electric Power University(Natural Science Edition), 2025-06-19. https://link. cnki. net/urlid/10. 1999.TM.20250618.1757.002
[3] 于海成, 田羽, 李庆健, 等. 基于红外图像和目标检测的露天矿火灾探测技术[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(增刊1): 212-218. Yu Haicheng, Tian Yu, Li Qingjian, et al. Fire detection technology in open-pit mines based on infrared images and target detection[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(S1): 212-218.
[4] 杨淞成, 鲍玉朋, 赵兰明. 基于黏度特征气体探测识别方法实验研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2020, 39(2): 243-246. Yang Songcheng, Bao Yupeng, Zhao Lanming. Gas detection and identification method based on viscosity characteristic[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(2): 243-246.
[5] 胡燕, 王慧琴, 张国飞, 等. 基于视频图像的远程火灾探测系统[J]. 计算机工程, 2013, 39(3): 279-284. Hu Yan, Wang Huiqin, Zhang Guofei, et al. Remote fire detection system based on video image[J]. Computer Engineering, 2013, 39(3): 279-284.
[6] 颜礼彬. 基于独立分量分析和颜色特征的视频火焰图像分割法[J]. 传感器与微系统, 2022, 41(4): 149-152. Yan Libin. Flame image segmentation method based on independent component analysis and color characteristics[J]. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies, 2022, 41(4): 149-152.
[7] Jeon M, Choi H S, Lee J, et al. Multi-scale prediction for fire detection using convolutional neural network[J]. Fire Technology, 2021, 57(5): 2533-2551.
[8] Wu S X, Zhang L B. Using popular object detection methods for real time forest fire detection[C] //2018 11th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design(ISCID). Hangzhou, China:IEEE, 2018: 280-284.
[9] Wu Y, Bakar M Z A. Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires using longitudinal ventilation systems: a study of the critical velocity[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2000, 35(4): 363-390.
[10] 雷文君, 郭丽丽, 赵旭明, 等. 补风方式对地铁隧道火灾烟气控制效果的研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 31-41. Lei Wenjun, Guo Lili, Zhao Xuming, et al. Study on the effect of makeup air supplementation on fire smoke control in subway tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(2): 31-41.
[11] Lee S R, Ryou H S. An experimental study of the effect of the aspect ratio on the critical velocity in longitudinal ventilation tunnel fires[J]. Journal of Fire Sciences, 2005, 23(2): 119-138.
[12] Li Y Z, Ingason H. Effect of cross section on critical velocity in longitudinally ventilated tunnel fires[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2017, 91: 303-311.
[13] 黄超. 平安隧道救援站排烟模式与人员疏散研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2015: 51-60. Huang Chao. Study on smoke extraction mode and evacuation of Ping An Railway Rescue Station[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015: 51-60.
[14] 王明年, 李琦, 于丽. 长大铁路隧道紧急救援站疏散设施设计参数研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(3): 285-290. Wang Mingnian, Li Qi, Yu Li. Study of design parameters of evacuation facility of emergency rescue stations in long railway tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(3): 285-290.
[15] 樊雯婧. 井下火灾多救护队救援路径优化的群智能算法研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2014: 11-40. Fan Wenjing. Swarm intelligence algorithm research on mine fire rescue path optimization with multiple rescue team[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 2014: 11-40.
[16] 黄莺, 郑雪琳, 赵鑫. 基于改进蚁群算法的展览馆火灾疏散路径研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2023, 42(10): 1362-1369. Huang Ying, Zheng Xuelin, Zhao Xin. Research on fire evacuation path of exhibition hall based on improved ant colony algorithm[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2023, 42(10): 1362-1369.
[17] JTG D70/2—2014公路隧道设计规范第二册交通工程与附属设施[S].
[18] JTG/T 3661—2025公路隧道交通工程与附属设施施工技术规范[S].
[19] 何应道, 郭超, 沈奕, 等. 大型多功能隧道火灾烟气流动特性数值模拟研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021, 58(增刊1): 536-540. He Yingdao, Guo Chao, Shen Yi, et al. Numerical simulation study on fire smoke flow characteristics in large multi-functional tunnel[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2021, 58(S1): 536-540.
[1] 罗驰恒, 郭元俊, 贾瑶, 姜学鹏. 盾构隧道疏散通道临界防烟风速计算模型研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-12.
[2] 戴志成, 李春林, 张亮亮, 李佳林. 隧内结构施作时机对大直径盾构隧道横向力学性能影响研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-20.
[3] 周朋. 附加荷载下盾构隧道穿越软硬不均地层的变形及损伤演化规律[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-15.
[4] 赵世超, 王剑宏, 王超, 鲁佳霖, 杜昌言. 双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-8.
[5] 翟彬, 刘燕, 刘峻廷, 袁鹏, 孙峰, 王伟, 张亮亮, 陈方岩. 黄河中下游粉质黏土地层超大直径盾构工作井空间效应研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-12.
[6] 陶志刚, 詹家旺, 尹乾, 任树林, 马至刚, 韦洪. 隧道高预紧力吸能锚杆大变形控制机理研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-14.
[7] 杜码, 陈洋, 马洪素, 赵志宏. 基于水平集方法的裂隙网络注浆扩散模拟方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-14.
[8] 孙文昊, 许为民, 何应道, 历朋林, 张锦程, 张亮亮. 黄河中下游公铁合建盾构隧道设计关键技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-10.
[9] 魏健, 常伟学, 梁庆国, 祁亮斌, 李奇伟. 断层破碎带隧道围岩变形及支护受力特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-14.
[10] 陈彰昕, 王刚, 李文锋, 李科, 江松, 刘廷方. 基于改进DeepLabV3+和渗流算法的隧道裂缝检测研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-14.
[11] 陈志敏, 师浩博, 张润龙, 黎俊鸿, 路帅, 谈成龙. 基于裂缝形状与特征的衬砌结构开裂截面稳定性评估研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-10.
[12] 钟浩, 张永平, 蔡先庆, 袁松, 孔庆轩, 孙浩, 郭胜. 基于多尺度地质特征增强与深度卷积网络的隧道掌子面围岩等级智能评估[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-13.
[13] 王浩赟, 张万志, 张恒, 孙岩峰, 袁铭占. 拱盖法隧道拱脚爆破围岩破坏特征与参数优化[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-13.
[14] 王立川,贺维国,张俊儒,武宏斌,蒋新强,章慧健,王文,黄林祥. 软弱破碎地层地铁车站钢管桩柱拱盖法施工力学特性及其应用[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 1-12.
[15] 邓稀肥,申志军,汪涛,江胜华,杨杰,李宏波. 基于直流电阻率法的旋喷桩加固正问题模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 13-20.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn