Abstract: The paper aimed to investigate the natural mechanism for this water inrush and mud outburst disaster in certain subway tunnels by energy theorem. The fundamental reason why this disaster was so large(approximately 11 679 m3)was that the equilibrium of the surrounding rock around the tunnel face was broken, and thus the volume of potential energy was transformed into kinetic energy and released instantaneously. Based on the field survey, some reasons were concluded as follows: the geological tectonic profile seemed like a “funnel”, where stress concentration was obvious; the tunnels crossed the bottom of the “funnel”; the weak and thin strongly-weathered tuff with many cracks located on the crown; the “funnel” stratum could collect a large amount of rainwater, and before this disaster, the rainfall resulted in the medium-coarse sand being saturated, so the water-head rose, seepage force increased, and the surrounding rock was weakened. These conditions could be classified into DI space. It could be seen from the numerical simulation that, the tunnel face applied by seepage force was unstable when strengthened by leading injected conduit whereas by taking account of the influences of seepage function, the tunnel face strengthened by steel piles could keep stable. By comprehensively analysis, it could conclude that the natural reasons for this disaster were that the combined effects consisting of increasing water pressure, concentrated stresses, seepage forces, applied to the degrading rocks, and then the potential energy transforming into kinetic energy formed this disaster on a large scale.
仇文革, 黄海昀, 闫飞跃, 孙克国. 基于能量原理的上覆饱水砂层隧道突水灾变[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(1): 1-11.
QIU Wenge, HUANG Haiyun, YAN Feiyue, SUN Keguo. A disaster with water inrush based on energy theorem in tunnels under saturated sandy stratum. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2021, 3(1): 1-11.
[1] 洪开荣.我国隧道及地下工程发展现状与展望[J].隧道建设,2015,35(2):95-107. HONG Kairong. State-of-art and prospect of tunnels and underground works in China[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2015, 35(2): 95-107. [2] 甘鹏路.富水软弱地层浅埋暗挖隧道地层变形规律及预测研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2016. GAN Penglu. Research on the rules and prediction of ground deformation induced by tunnelling with shallow tunnelling method under water-rich soft stratum[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2016. [3] 李涛,韩雪峰,黄华,等.深圳富水复合地层地铁隧道暗挖施工引起地表沉降规律的研究[J].现代隧道技术, 2014, 51(2): 76-82. LI Tao, HAN Xuefeng, HUANG Hua, et al. Laws of surface subsidence caused by the excavation of a bored subway tunnel in a water-rich mixed ground in Shenzhen[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2014, 51(2): 76-82. [4] 苏秀婷.青岛地铁富水砂层隧道开挖施工风险与变形规律研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学, 2012. SU Xiuting. Research of tunnel excavation risk and settlement in water-enriched soil layers of Qingdao Metro[D].Qingdao:Ocean University of China, 2012. [5] 晏启祥,郑代靖,何川,等.富水砂卵石地层地铁盾构施工若干问题及对策[J].地下空间与工程学报,2015,11(3): 713-719. YAN Qixiang, ZHENG Daijing, HE Chuan, et al. Problems and countermeasures of metro shield construction in water-soaked sand and cobble stratum[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2015, 11(3): 713-719. [6] 张红军.上覆富水砂层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与注浆加固对策研究[D].济南:山东大学,2017. ZHANG Hongjun. Study on tunnel face stability and grouting reinforcement for tunnels overlying water-rich sand stratum[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2017. [7] 张瑾.青岛富水砂层隧道变形机理及其控制对策研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2013. ZHANG Jin. Deformation mechanism and its control strategy for water-rich sand stratum in tunnels of Qingdao [D]. Beijing:China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, 2013. [8] 朱双厅,沈炜东,刘锦成,等.长沙地铁富水软弱地层盾构下穿京广铁路风险分析与控制研究[J].铁道标准设计, 2014,58(6): 102-107. ZHU Shuangting, SHEN Weidong, LIU Jincheng, et al. Construction risk analysis and control measures for a Changsha Metro's shield tunnel crossing below existing Beijing-Guangzhou Railway in water-rich soft soil stratum [J]. Railway Standard Design, 2014, 58(6):102-107. [9] 李术才,李晓昭,靖洪文,等.深长隧道突水突泥重大灾害致灾机理及预测预警与控制理论研究进展[J]. 中国基础科学, 2017, 19(3): 27-43. LI Shucai, LI Xiaozhao, JING Hongwen, et al. Research development of catastrophe mechanism and forecast controlling theory of water inrush and mud gushing in deep long tunnel[J]. China Basic Science, 2017, 19(3): 27-43. [10] 黄鑫,林鹏,许振浩,等.岩溶隧道突水突泥防突评判方法及其工程应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2018, 49(10): 2533-2544. HUANG Xin, LIN Peng, XU Zhenhao, et al. Prevention structure assessment method against water and mud inrush in Karst tunnels and its application[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2018, 49(10):2533-2544. [11] 毕焕军.大梁隧道突水突石机理分析及处理措施研究[J].铁道工程学报, 2015, 32(2): 82-85. BI Huanjun. Mechanism analysis and treatments of water and stone inrush in Daliang Tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015, 32(2): 82-85. [12] 金磊,曾亚武,程涛,等.隧道突泥破坏的耦合格子Boltzmann-离散元法模拟[J/OL].岩土工程学报.[2021-01-27]. https://kns.cnki.net/kns8/defaultresult/index. JIN Lei, ZENG Yawu, CHENG Tao, et al. Numerical simulation of tunnel mud inrush with the coupled LBM-DEM[J/OL].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.[2021-01-27]. https://kns.cnki.net/kns8/defaultresult/index. [13] 刘金泉,杨典森,陈卫忠,等.全风化花岗岩突水通道扩展的颗粒起动流速研究[J].岩土力学,2017,38(4): 1179-1187. LIU Jinquan, YANG Diansen, CHEN Weizhong, et al.Research on particle starting velocity in the expansion of water inrush channel in completely weathered granite[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(4): 1179-1187. [14] 毛邦燕,张广泽,唐兵,等.沪昆客专岗乌隧道1#横洞突水机制分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2016, 33(6): 83-87. MAO Bangyan, ZHANG Guangze, TANG Bing, et al. Analysis of mechanism of water-inrush of the 1# transverse of Gangwu Tunnel in the Shanghai-Kunming Passenger Special Line[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2016, 33(6): 83-87. [15] 袁永才,李术才,李利平,等.尚家湾强岩溶隧道突水突泥伴生灾害源综合分析[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(1): 203-211. YUAN Yongcai, LI Shucai, LI Liping, et al. Comprehensive analysis on disaster associated by water inrush and mud gushing in Shangjiawan Karst Tunnel[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2017, 48(1): 203-211. [16] 张会刚, 张广泽, 毛邦燕. 沪昆客专小高山隧道突水突泥及致灾原因探析[J].铁道工程学报,2016,33(8): 66-70. ZHANG Huigang, ZHANG Guangze, MAO Bangyan. Mechanism analysis and water and mud breakout in the Xiaogao Mountain Tunnel in Shanghai-Kunming Passenger Dedicated Railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2016, 33(8): 66-70. [17] 张民庆,何志军,黄鸿健,等.兰新二线大梁隧道突水突泥原因分析与治理[J].铁道工程学报,2015, 32(3): 77-80. ZHANG Minqing, HE Zhijun, HUANG Hongjian, et al.Causal analysis and governance of the water & mud bursting in Daliang Tunnel on Lanzhou-Xinjiang Second Railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015, 32(3): 77-80. [18] 张庆艳, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强,等.断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究[J].岩土力学,2020,41(6): 1911-1922. ZHANG Qingyan, CHEN Weizhong, YUAN Jingqiang, et al.Experimental study on evolution characteristics of water and mud inrush in fault fractured zone[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1911-1922. [19] 张民庆, 高扬. 隧道深埋富水滑动型软弱带突水突泥处理技术[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2015, 32(11): 102-106. ZHANG Minqing, GAO Yang. Treatment technology for water and mud bursting of deep water rich sliding type weak zone on tunnel [J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015, 32(11): 102-106. [20] 张民庆,黄鸿健,张生学,等.宜万铁路马鹿箐隧道1·21突水突泥抢险治理技术[J].铁道工程学报,2008(11): 49-56. ZHANG Minqing, HUANG Hongjian, ZHANG Shengxue,et al.Treatment technology for water and mud bursting on 1·21 in Maluqing Tunnel of Yichang-Wanzhou Railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2008(11): 49-56. [21] 张民庆,汪纲领,孙国庆.南广铁路白云隧道断层突泥灾害治理技术[J].铁道工程学报, 2012, 29(3): 69-73. ZHANG Minqing, WANG Gangling, SUN Guoqing. Treatment technology for mud bursting of Baiyun Tunnel of Nanning-Guangzhou Railway in fault [J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2012, 29(3): 69-73. [22] 王光辉, 蔡军峰. 泥水平衡盾构泥浆漏斗黏度分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2008, 28(6): 646-649. WANG Guanghui, CAI Junfeng. Analysis on funnel viscosity of slurry used in slurry balanced shield machines [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2008, 28(6): 646-649. [23] 仇文革,孙克国,王立川,等.基于围岩稳定性的大断面隧道初期支护优化[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(增刊2): 8-13. QIU Wenge, SUN Keguo, WANG Lichuan, et al. Primary support optimization of large section tunnel based on surrounding rock stability[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(Suppl.2): 8-13.
2021, Vol. 3 
