Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2020, Vol. 2 Issue (4): 74-82    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
地铁暗挖隧道下穿既有火车站站场施工方案安全性评估
陶永虎,饶军应*,熊鹏,彭浩,聂崇欣,赵昌杰,彭星,孔德禹,王亚奇
贵州大学土木工程学院, 贵州 贵阳 550025
Safety evaluation of construction schemes for underground excavated metro tunnels passing existing railway station yards
TAO Yonghu, RAO Junying*, XIONG Peng, PENG Hao, NIE Chongxin, ZHAO Changjie, PENG Xing, KONG Deyu, WANG Yaqi
School of Civil Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China
下载:  PDF (14571KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 地铁下穿火车站站房时,易引起地表沉降,进而导致围岩失稳、施工难度及成本增加。对于工程建设,在下穿区段进行施工力学行为研究仍有必要。以贵阳地铁1号线火车站站—沙冲路站区间(火—沙区间)为依托,结合数值仿真软件FLAC3D建立隧道下穿火车站的分析模型,研究下穿区段路基沉降变化规律及暗挖区间隧道衬砌结构内力、安全系数等。结果表明:随着地铁隧道逐步开挖,火车站站场的路基沉降逐渐增大,但未超过下穿区段既有铁路变形控制标准;二次衬砌结构施工后,既有铁路沉降的纵向分布近似为正态分布曲线,且与Peck提出的地表沉降槽变化规律一致,其沉降范围为-50~50 m;衬砌结构应力主要集中在区间衬砌结构的墙腰及拱顶处,二次衬砌结构变形类型有大偏心、小偏心,轴力从拱顶至墙脚向两侧逐渐增大,两侧基本对称,墙脚处出现最大轴力;二次衬砌结构变形稳定后,交叉点处路基沉降最大沉降为2.87 mm,满足下穿站场段既有铁路变形控制标准。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陶永虎
饶军应
熊鹏
彭浩
聂崇欣
赵昌杰
彭星
孔德禹
王亚奇
关键词:  下穿站场  力学行为  路基沉降  施工扰动控制  数值仿真    
Abstract: When the subway goes under the station building of the railway station, it is easy to cause surface settlement, which in turn leads to instability of confining pressure, difficulty in construction, and increased costs. For engineering construction, it is still necessary to study the construction mechanics behavior in the underpass section. Based on Guiyang Metro Line 1 Railway Shachong Road Station Section(Huo-sha Section), combined with the numerical simulation software FLAC3D to establish an analysis model of the tunnel passing through the train station, and study the subgrade settlement changes, dark the internal force and safety factor of the lining structure in the excavation section. The results showed: with the gradual excavation of subway tunnels, the subgrade settlement of the railway station yard gradually increased, but it did not exceed the existing railway deformation control standards in the underpass section; after the construction of the secondary lining structure, the longitudinal distribution of the existing railway settlement was approximately a normal distribution curve, consisted with the change law of the surface settlement trough proposed by Peck, and the settlement range was from -50 to 50 m; the stress of the masonry structure was mainly concentrated on the wall waist and vault of the interval lining structure, the deformation types of the secondary lining structure were large eccentricity and small eccentricity, the axial force value gradually increased from the vault to the foot of the wall to both sides, and the two sides were basically symmetrical, the maximum axial force appeared at the foot of the wall; after the deformation of the secondary lining structure was stable, the maximum settlement value of the roadbed settlement at the intersection was 2.87 mm, which met the deformation control standard of the existing railway under the station yard.
Key words:  underpassing station yard    construction mechanics behavior    subgrade settlement    construction disturbance control    numerical simulation
                    发布日期:  2021-02-25      期的出版日期:  2020-12-20
中图分类号:  TU45  
作者简介:  陶永虎(1995— ),男,贵州威宁人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为岩土及隧道工程. E-mail:1562521808@qq.com. *通信作者简介:饶军应(1983— ),男,江西南丰人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为岩土及隧道工程. E-mail:jyrao@gzu.edu.cn
引用本文:    
陶永虎,饶军应,熊鹏,彭浩,聂崇欣,赵昌杰,彭星,孔德禹,王亚奇. 地铁暗挖隧道下穿既有火车站站场施工方案安全性评估[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 74-82.
TAO Yonghu, RAO Junying, XIONG Peng, PENG Hao, NIE Chongxin, ZHAO Changjie, PENG Xing, KONG Deyu, WANG Yaqi. Safety evaluation of construction schemes for underground excavated metro tunnels passing existing railway station yards. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2020, 2(4): 74-82.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2020/V2/I4/74
[1] 田海波,宋天田.轨道交通9号线下穿铁路工程风险及对策研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2007(1):147-150. TIAN Haibo, SONG Tiantian. Research of risks and countermeasures on project of metro beneath the railway[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2007(1):147-150.
[2] 黄德华.粉砂地层近距双洞隧道浅埋暗挖穿越铁路施工[J].施工技术,2004, 33(10):21-22. HUANG Dehua. Construction of a short-range shallow buried covered excavation cross-railway tunnel in silt stratum[J]. Construction Technology, 2004, 33(10):21-22.
[3] 许恺, 练松良, 黄俊飞.地铁施工穿越铁路车站对列车限速的影响[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,31(2):174-177. XU Kai, LIAN Songliang, HUANG Junfei. Analysis of critical speed of train during excavating of metro station of railway station[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2003, 31(2):174-177.
[4] 朱合华,丁文其,乔亚飞,等.盾构隧道微扰动施工控制技术体系及其应用[J].岩土工程学报,2014,36(11):1983-1993. ZHU Hehua, DING Wenqi, QIAO Yafei, et al. Micro-disturbed construction control technology system for shield driven tunnels and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(11): 1983-1993.
[5] LOGANATHAN N, POULOS H G. Analytical prediction for tunneling-induced ground movements in clays[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(9):846-856.
[6] XIE X Y,YANG Y B, JI M. Analysis of ground surface settlement induced by the construction of a large-diameter shield-driven tunnel in Shanghai, China[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 51:120-132.
[7] HE C, FENG K, FANG Y, et al. Surface settlement caused by twin-parallel shield tunnelling in sandy cobble strata[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2012, 13(11):858-869.
[8] 牛泽林,吴焕通,綦彦波,等.大断面浅埋隧道下穿既有建筑群爆破减震模型试验与研究[J].现代隧道技术,2016,53(4):129-133. NIU Zelin, WU Huantong, QI Yanbo, et al. Blasting vibration reduction model for large-section shallow tunnels approaching existing buildings[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2016, 53(4):129-133.
[9] 卢华喜,王漪璇,周珍伟,等.盾构隧道下穿铁路股道及火车站站房的影响分析[J].华东交通大学学报,2015,32(4):25-32. LU Huaxi, WANG Yixuan, ZHOU Zhenwei, et al. Influence analysis of subway shield tunneling on existing track and railway station building[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2015, 32(4):25-32.
[10] 谢雄耀,王强,刘欢,等.富水圆砾地层盾构下穿火车站股道沉降控制技术研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(增刊2):3960-3970. XIE Xiongyao, WANG Qiang, LIU Huan, et al. Settlement control study of shield tunnelling crossing railway station in round gravel strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(Suppl.2):3960-3970.
[11] CHEN S L, GUI M W, YANG M C. Applicability of the principle of superposition in estimating ground surface settlement of twin-and quadruple-tube tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 28:135-149.
[12] 严健,何川,吴海彬,等.基于Peck公式的藏区公路隧道施工地面沉降预测[J].公路交通科技,2015,32(1):110-115. YAN Jian, HE Chuan, WU Haibin, et al. Prediction of ground settlement for highway tunnel construction in Tibet based on peck formula[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 32(1):110-115.
[13] 国家铁路局.铁路隧道设计规范:TB1003—2016[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社,2016.
[1] 陶永虎, 饶军应, 熊鹏, 彭浩, 聂崇欣, 赵昌杰, 彭星, 孔德禹, 王亚奇. 地铁暗挖隧道下穿既有火车站站场施工方案安全性评估[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-9.
[2] 房倩, 杜建明, 王赶, 王中举, 王官清. 砂土隧道开挖地层变形规律及影响因素分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-10.
[3] 张奇华, 张煜, 李利平, 刘洪亮, 石根华. 块体理论在地下洞室围岩稳定分析中的应用进展[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-10.
[4] 龚秋明,吴帆,殷丽君. 岩石复合地层滚刀线性切割破岩试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(2): 67-73.
[5] 房倩,杜建明,王赶,王中举,王官清. 砂土隧道开挖地层变形规律及影响因素分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 67-76.
[6] 张奇华,张煜,李利平,刘洪亮,石根华. 块体理论在地下洞室围岩稳定分析中的应用进展[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 9-18.
[7] 刘立鹏,王彦兵,宋倩. 水工有压隧洞衬砌启裂水头及围岩联合承载影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 52-58.
[8] 刘立鹏, 汪小刚, 陈晨. 水工有压隧洞衬砌启裂水头及围岩联合承载影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-7.
[9] 龚秋明, 吴帆, 殷丽君. 岩石复合地层滚刀线性切割破岩试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-11.
[10] 张庆松,张连震,李鹏,冯啸. 地下工程富水软弱地层注浆加固理论研究新进展[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 47-57.
[11] 夏开文,徐颖,陈荣. 考虑深部赋存条件的岩石动态破坏试验研究进展[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 58-75.
[12] 陈建勋,罗彦斌. 大跨度黄土公路隧道结构稳定性及控制技术研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 93-101.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn