Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
不同洞距下内衬式高压储气库热-力特性分析
阮泉泉1,2,张文1,张彬2*,王其宽2,王汉勋2,时广升2
(1.青海大学土木水利学院 青海 西宁 810016;2.中国地质大学(北京)工程技术学院 北京 100083)
Thermal and mechanical characteristics analysis of lined high pressure gas storage with different hole spacing
RUAN Quanquan1,2,ZHANG Wen1,ZHANG Bin2*,WANG Qikuan2,WANG Hanxun2,SHI Guansheng2
(1.College of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Qinghai University,Xining 810016,Qinghai,China; 2. School of Engineering and Technology,China University of Geosciences( Beijing) ,Beijing 100083,China)
下载:  PDF (4090KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 拟利用安徽某深部硬石膏矿体建造大规模内衬岩洞式储气库为研究背景,基于ABAQUS有限元软件的热-力耦合分析方法,研究深埋洞室不同洞距下多循环充采气过程中关键结构层温度、变形、应力的分布及变化过程,探究不同洞距下围岩塑性区分布规律以及地表变形变化过程。结果表明:增大洞距对主要结构层的温度基本没有影响;洞距小于2倍洞径时,改变洞距对关键结构层的应力和变形、地表位移、混凝土衬砌的拉应力分布和大小以及围岩塑性区的分布有较为明显的影响,储气库间的相互作用较为显著;当洞距增大到2倍洞径后,储气库间的相互作用已经不再明显,此时增大洞距对储气库的稳定性没有明显的增强效果,该研究成果为地下储气库的建造和运行提供了参考依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
阮泉泉
张文
张彬
王其宽
王汉勋
时广升
关键词:  内衬岩洞  深部硬石膏矿  储气库  热-力耦合  洞室间距    
Abstract: Taking a deep Anhui anhydrite ore body lining building large-scale gas storage cavern type as the research background, based on ABAQUS finite element software of thermal - mechanical coupling analysis method, established numerical model under the gravity stress field, the deep cavity multi cycle under different hole was apart from the temperature, the gas extraction in the process of filling the key stratum structure deformation, stress distribution and the change process,The distribution law of surrounding rock plastic zone and the change process of surface deformation under different hole spacing were investigated.The results showed that the temperature of the main structural layers was not affected by increasing the hole distance.When the hole distance was less than 2 times the hole diameter, changing the hole distance had obvious effects on the stress and deformation of key structural layers, surface displacement, tensile stress distribution and size of concrete lining, and plastic zone distribution of surrounding rock, and the interaction between gas storage was more significant.When the hole distance increased to 2 times the hole diameter, the interaction between gas storage was no longer obvious, and the increase of hole distance had no obvious effect on the stability of gas storage. The research results provided a reference for the construction and operation of underground gas storage.
Key words:  lined rock caverns    deep anhydrite mine    gas storage caverns    thermal-mechanical coupling    cavern spacing
收稿日期:  2024-01-02      修回日期:  2024-03-01      发布日期:  2024-03-02     
中图分类号:  TU9  
基金资助: 青海省重点研发与转化计划资助项目(2023-QY-209)
通讯作者:  张彬(1975—),男,四川什邡人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为地下能源储存工程地质、地质灾害防治。    E-mail:  sc_zhb@cugb.edu.cn
作者简介:  阮泉泉(1997—),男,陕西安康人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为地下能源储存工程地质。E-mail:rqqcugb@163.com
引用本文:    
阮泉泉, 张文, 张彬, 王其宽, 王汉勋, 时广升. 不同洞距下内衬式高压储气库热-力特性分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
RUAN Quanquan, ZHANG Wen, ZHANG Bin, WANG Qikuan, WANG Hanxun, SHI Guansheng. Thermal and mechanical characteristics analysis of lined high pressure gas storage with different hole spacing. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-16.
链接本文:  
[1] 马洪岭, 梁孝鹏, 赵凯, 施锡林, 马华兴, 莫磊, 杨春和. 山东泰安盐穴储气库地质可行性分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 19-27.
[2] 尹洪武, 朱耿德, 朱耿刚, 葛鑫博. 超深地层盐岩单轴压缩损伤演化过程分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 53-60.
[3] 王者超,李崴,刘杰,郭家繁,张宇鹏. 地下储气库发展现状与安全事故原因综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(2): 49-58.
[1] QIAN Qihu. Scientific use of the urban underground space to construction the harmonious livable and beautiful city[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 1 -7 .
[2] ZHOU Caigui, LI Jing, LIANG Qingguo, CHEN Kelin. Comparison of water inflow prediction methods of hydraulic diversion tunnels during construction[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 32 -44 .
[3] HUANG Zheng, YE Zhangqian, ZHANG Jiawei, PENG Zimao, YAN Zhanshuo. The influence of intumescent fire retardant coating on the fire resistance of assembled frame tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -16 .
[4] ZHANG Ning, HUANG Xinjie, WANG Chuan, XU Bin, ZHANG Jiancheng, ZHANG Bo. Experimental and numerical simulation of high-pressure water jet cutting concrete[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 47 -56 .
[5] . [J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2): 124 -127 .
[6] JIA Rui, YANG Gang, ZHENG Gang. Influence of shield tunnel construction history on seismic response of tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 41 -51 .
[7] WANG Qiuzhe, HAN Rui, BAI Xiaoxiao, ZHAO Kai. Seismic stability of immersed tunnel under locked backfill[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 71 -77 .
[8] . [J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2): 128 -130 .
[9] HAO Junsuo, LIU Junfeng, LIU Hao, ZHAO Mingfan. Inducement and prevention technology of secondary disasters of water and mud inrush in tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 81 -92 .
[10] DONG Longjun, WANG Junhui, MA Ju. Response and support suggestions of surrounding rock of underground cavern under different microseismic source mechanism[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(3): 68 -76 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn