Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (1): 73-87    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.01.07
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
小净距隧道施工地层和隧道变形特征及韧性评价研究
刘吉诚1,张雪峰1,甄玉超1,林庆涛2*,杨成贺2,路德春2,杜修力2
1.中建路桥集团有限公司, 河北 石家庄 050011;2.北京工业大学岩土与地下工程研究所, 北京 100124
Study on the deformation features and resilience evaluation of tunnels in the construction of closely-spaced tunnels
LIU Jicheng1, ZHANG Xuefeng1, ZHEN Yuchao1, LIN Qingtao2*, YANG Chenghe2, LU Dechun2, DU Xiuli2
1. China Construction Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, China;
2. Institute of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
下载:  PDF (18898KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 小净距隧道左右洞之间距离较小,后行隧道施工扰动极易威胁先行隧道的结构安全,实现小净距隧道工程中先行隧道结构抵抗后行隧道施工扰动能力和扰动后功能恢复能力的量化评估,即韧性评价,对于小净距隧道的安全建设具有重要意义。以新晋高速公路韩口隧道中小净距隧道为背景工程,考虑工程中Ⅴ级围岩段隧道埋深和净距的变化,基于ABAQUS平台建立9种工况(3种埋深×3种净距)的有限元模型,并基于实测隧道拱顶沉降和收敛变形验证数值模型的合理性。研究发现,相较于水平收敛,后行隧道施工拱顶沉降对应的先行隧道功能降低更为显著,更适合作为韧性计算的指标。基于确定的韧性计算指标和性能演化规律,实现了各工况下抗力韧性和恢复韧性的指数计算。在相同埋深下,隧道净距从10 m增大到30 m,先行隧道的抗力韧性指数和恢复韧性指数提高1.0%~9.0%;在相同净距下,隧道埋深从150 m减小到50 m,先行隧道的抗力韧性指数和恢复韧性指数提高4.0%~12.0%。隧道净距越大、埋深越小,隧道的抗力韧性指数和恢复韧性指数越高,所有工况中仅埋深150 m、净距10 m的工况,先行隧道的韧性处于中韧性等级,其他工况下先行隧道为处于高韧性等级。本研究为小净距隧道的韧性设计与施工提供了量化评价方法,可为类似工程的建设提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘吉诚
张雪峰
甄玉超
林庆涛
杨成贺
路德春
杜修力
关键词:  小净距  深埋隧道  拱顶沉降  隧道功能  韧性评价    
Abstract: The construction of closely-spaced tunnels, characterized by the limited clearance between adjacent drifts, posed significant challenges as the excavation of the subsequent tunnel could induce considerable disturbances that jeopardized the structural integrity of the pilot tunnel. Quantifying the resilience of the pilot tunnel-defined as its capacity to withstand construction-induced disturbances from the subsequent tunnel and to recover its functionality thereafter-was therefore crucial for ensuring safety during the construction of closely-spaced tunnels. This study investigated the Hankou Spiral Tunnels, a closely-spaced tunnel complex within the Xinjin Expressway project. Finite element models for nine distinct scenarios, encompassing three varying burial depths and three clear distances in a Grade V rock mass, were developed using the ABAQUS platform. The validity of the numerical model was confirmed through comparison with field monitoring data, specifically tunnel crown settlement and convergence deformation. Analysis revealed that crown settlement induced by subsequent tunnel excavation led to more pronounced functional degradation of the pilot tunnel compared to horizontal convergence, establishing it as the more appropriate indicator for resilience quantification. Based on the identified resilience evaluation indicators and structural performance evolution patterns, both resistance resilience index and recovery resilience index were calculated for all working conditions. The results demonstrated that increasing the pillar width from 10 m to 30 m under constant burial depth conditions enhanced the resistance and recovery resilience indices by 1.0%-9.0%, while reducing the burial depth from 150 m to 50 m under constant pillar width conditions improved these indices by 4.0%-12.0%. Generally, larger pillar widths and shallower burial depths resulted in higher resilience indices, with only the scenario combining 150 m burial depth and 10 m pillar width classified as medium resilience level, while all other configurations achieved high resilience level. This research provided a quantitative assessment framework for resilience-oriented design and construction of closely-spaced tunnels, offering valuable references for similar underground engineering projects.
Key words:  closely-spaced    deep tunnel    crown settlement    tunnel functionality    resilience assessment
发布日期:  2026-03-23     
中图分类号:  U45  
  TU452  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(52478383);国家自然科学基金杰青资助项目(52025084);国家重点研发计划资助项目(2022YFC3800901);北京市博士后资助项目(2024-ZZ-21);湖南科技大学岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测省重点实验室开放基金资助项目(E22419)
作者简介:  刘吉诚(1971— ),男,北京人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为桥梁、隧道建设. E-mail:1062533816@ qq.com. *通信作者简介:林庆涛(1987— ),男,山东聊城人,副研究员,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为岩土与城市地下工程. E-mail:linqingtao@bjut.edu.cn
引用本文:    
刘吉诚, 张雪峰, 甄玉超, 林庆涛, 杨成贺, 路德春, 杜修力. 小净距隧道施工地层和隧道变形特征及韧性评价研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 73-87.
LIU Jicheng, ZHANG Xuefeng, ZHEN Yuchao, LIN Qingtao, YANG Chenghe, LU Dechun, DU Xiuli. Study on the deformation features and resilience evaluation of tunnels in the construction of closely-spaced tunnels. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(1): 73-87.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I1/73
[1] 程光华, 王睿, 赵牧华, 等. 国内城市地下空间开发利用现状与发展趋势[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(3): 39-47. CHENG Guanghua, WANG Rui, ZHAO Muhua, et al. Present situation and developmental trend of urban underground space development and utilization in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(3): 39-47.
[2] 翟婉明, 赵春发. 现代轨道交通工程科技前沿与挑战[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2016, 51(2): 209-226. ZHAI Wanming, ZHAO Chunfa. Frontiers and challenges of sciences and technologies in modern railway engineering[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 51(2): 209-226.
[3] 张顶立, 陈立平, 房倩, 等. 小净距隧道中央岩墙稳定性分析及其应用[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2016, 40(1): 1-11. ZHANG Dingli, CHEN Liping, FANG Qian, et al. Research and application on central rock wall dike stability of small interval tunnel[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016, 40(1): 1-11.
[4] LI A, FANG Q, ZHANG D L, et al. Blast vibration of a large-span high-speed railway tunnel based on microseismic monitoring[J]. Smart Structures & Systems, 2018, 21(5): 561-569.
[5] 杜菊红, 黄宏伟, 熊玉朝. 小净距隧道净距研究及施工技术应用[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2007, 3(3): 488-493. DU Juhong, HUANG Hongwei, XIONG Yuzhao. Investigation on the optimal distance and construction technologies of closely spaced tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2007, 3(3): 488-493.
[6] 周静增, 王建华, 闫自海, 等. 软土地层小净距重叠隧道盾构施工相互扰动影响分析及控制措施[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(2): 61-68. ZHOU Jingzeng, WANG Jianhua, YAN Zihai, et al. Mutual disturbance effects of different construction sequence on overlapping shield tunnels with small net distance in soft soil layer and its control methods[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2021, 3(2): 61-68.
[7] 涂智溢, 郭洪雨, 孙飞, 等. 闹市区复杂环境下大直径盾构小净距下穿运营地铁隧道的应对措施及分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 75-84. TU Zhiyi, GUO Hongyu, SUN Fei, et al. Countermeasures and analysis of large diameter shield tunneling under operating subway tunnel with small clear distance in downtown complex environment[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2021, 3(4): 75-84.
[8] 李旭哲, 李文杰, 毕志刚, 等. 小净距隧道先行洞爆破开挖对后行洞围岩稳定性影响研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2024, 43(7): 42-49. LI Xuzhe, LI Wenjie, BI Zhigang, et al. Effects of blasting excavation of 1st tunnel of small clear distance tunnels on surrounding rock stability of 2nd tunnel[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(7): 42-49.
[9] SONG S G, LI S C, LI L P, et al. Model test study on vibration blasting of large cross-section tunnel with small clearance in horizontal stratified surrounding rock[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 92: 103013.
[10] HOLLING C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4: 1-23.
[11] AFSHANI A, AKAGI H, KONISHI S. Close construction effect and lining behavior during tunnel excavation with an elliptical cross-section[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2020, 60(1): 28-44.
[12] CHEN S L, LEE S C, GUI M W. Effects of rock pillar width on the excavation behavior of parallel tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(2): 148-154.
[13] CHEN S L, GUI M W, YANG M C. Applicability of the principle of superposition in estimating ground surface settlement of twin- and quadruple-tube tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 28: 135-149.
[14] 裴超, 肖勇, 朱智勇, 等. 复杂应力环境中隧道大变形特征与形变控制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 89-98. PEI Chao, XIAO Yong, ZHU Zhiyong, et al. Large deformation characteristics and deformation control of tunnel in complex stress environment[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 89-98.
[15] 蒋宇静, 王兴达, 张学朋. 远场地震作用下跨断层深埋隧道结构的动力变形破坏特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 1-11. JIANG Yujing, WANG Xingda, ZHANG Xuepeng. Dynamic deformation and failure characteristic of deep buried tunnel crossing fault under far-field earthquake loading[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 1-11.
[16] 蔡遵乐, 梁庆国, 曹生慧, 等. 高地应力软岩隧道的变形规律[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 21-32. CAI Zunle, LIANG Qingguo, CAO Shenghui, et al. The deformation pattern of soft rock tunnels with high ground stress[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 21-32.
[17] 王圣涛, 陈鹏涛, 刘爱武, 等. 特大跨连续变断面隧道双导洞超前-中柱反向扩挖的施工力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 1-11. WANG Shengtao, CHEN Pengtao, LIU Aiwu, et al. Construction mechanics behavior of extra-large span continuous variable cross-section tunnels using dual guide tunnel advance-central column reverse excavation method[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(4): 1-11.
[18] GAO F, YE J N, ZHAO C, et al. Soil disturbance induced by shield tunnelling in sensitive clay: in situ test and analyses[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2023, 42: 101106.
[19] 王飞飞, 江学良, 杨慧, 等. 浅埋偏压小净距隧道加速度响应规律试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(17): 238-247. WANG Feifei, JIANG Xueliang, YANG Hui, et al. Tests and numerical simulation for acceleration response laws of a shallow buried small spacing tunnel with asymmetrical pressure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(17): 238-247.
[20] 吴梦军, 曹鹏. 卵石层小净距隧道关键参数研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2019, 39(增刊1): 38-44. WU Mengjun, CAO Peng. Study on key parameters of small spacing tunnels in pebble layer[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39(Suppl.1): 38-44.
[21] 刘代国, 左昌群, 唐霞, 等. 地铁盾构近距离后行洞施工对先行洞影响的力学效应[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(4): 1027-1034. LIU Daiguo, ZUO Changqun, TANG Xia, et al. Mechanical effects of adjacent metro shield construction of the first hole on the second hole[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2017, 48(4): 1027-1034.
[22] 扈萍, 马梁, 李萌, 等. 小净距隧道后行洞开挖对先行洞的变形影响[J]. 济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 36(3): 246-251. HU Ping, MA Liang, LI Meng, et al. Deformation effect of subsequent holes excavation on advanced holes in small clear distance tunnels[J]. Journal of University of Jinan(Science and Technology), 2022, 36(3): 246-251, 272.
[23] 褚衍玉, 张聪瑞, 任高峰, 等. 后行洞开挖对浅埋偏压小净距隧道影响研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2016, 40(5): 919-922. CHU Yanyu, ZHANG Congrui, REN Gaofeng, et al. The excavation of following tunnel effect in shallow small spacing tunnels with unsymmetrical load[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering), 2016, 40(5): 919-922.
[24] DHAR B B, RATAN S, SHARMA D K, et al. Model study of fracture around underground excavations in weak rocks[C] //ISRM International Symposium. Tokyo, Japan, 1981: ISRM-IS-1981-043.
[25] 路德春, 马超, 杜修力, 等. 城市地下结构抗震韧性研究进展[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2022, 52(10): 1469-1483. LU Dechun, MA Chao, DU Xiuli, et al. Earthquake resilience of urban underground structures: State of the art[J]. Scientia Sinica(Technologica), 2022, 52(10): 1469-1483.
[26] 廖英泽, 王国盛, 李喆, 等. 城市地下基础设施韧性发展现状及策略[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2022, 42(6): 1183-1190. LIAO Yingze, WANG Guosheng, LI Zhe, et al. Development status and strategy of urban underground infrastructure resilience[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2022, 42(6): 1183-1190.
[27] 路德春, 廖英泽, 曾娇, 等. 城市地下空间恢复韧性发展策略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2023, 25(1): 38-44. LU Dechun, LIAO Yingze, ZENG Jiao, et al. Development strategy for recovery resilience of urban underground space[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2023, 25(1): 38-44.
[28] BRUNEAU M, CHANG S E, EGUCHI R T, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752.
[29] HUANG H W, ZHANG D M. Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining under extreme surcharge: Characterization and field application[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 51: 301-312.
[30] 林星涛, 陈湘生, 苏栋, 等. 考虑多次扰动影响的盾构隧道结构韧性评估方法及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(4): 591-601. LIN Xingtao, CHEN Xiangsheng, SU Dong, et al. Evaluation method for resilience of shield tunnel linings considering multiple disturbances and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(4): 591-601.
[31] 朱旻, 陈湘生, 夏长青, 等. 地面堆载下盾构隧道结构韧性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(1): 35-44. ZHU Min, CHEN Xiangsheng, XIA Changqing, et al. Resilience evolution of shield tunnel structures under ground surcharge[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 35-44.
[32] JIANG L, HAO S Y. Resilience evaluation of the existing shield tunnel lining induced by the symmetrical excavation of adjacent foundation pit based on numerical simulations[J]. Symmetry, 2022, 14(2): 229.
[33] QIU T, SUN X H, CHEN X S, et al. Experimental study and resilience modeling for prefabricated hollow diaphragm walls of full-assembled underground stations under urban multi-disturbance conditions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 135: 105044.
[34] HAN K H, ZHANG D M, CHEN X S, et al. A resilience assessment framework for existing underground structures under adjacent construction disturbance[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 141: 105339.
[35] LIN X T, CHEN X S, SU D, et al. An analytical model to evaluate the resilience of shield tunnel linings considering multistage disturbances and recoveries[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 127: 104581.
[36] CIMELLARO G P, REINHORN A M, BRUNEAU M. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(11): 3639-3649.
[37] 郑刚, 程雪松, 周海祚, 等. 岩土与地下工程结构韧性评价与控制[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(7): 1-38. ZHENG Gang, CHENG Xuesong, ZHOU Haizuo, et al. Resilient evaluation and control in geotechnical and underground engineering[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2022, 55(7): 1-38.
[1] 李卫平, 林波, 段汝健, 李西亚, 白兴金, 何本国, 李耀东. 深埋隧道岩爆段地应力反演与围岩破坏特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 59-72.
[2] 涂智溢, 郭洪雨, 孙飞, 钟方杰, 郑浩龙, 张哲. 闹市区复杂环境下大直径盾构小净距下穿运营地铁隧道的应对措施及分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 75-84.
[3] 刘宏达,杨天亮,张冬梅. 基于离散元分析的砂土深埋盾构隧道土压力计算方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(2): 31-40.
[4] 焦玉勇, 张为社, 欧光照, 邹俊鹏, 陈光辉. 深埋隧道钻爆法开挖段突涌水灾害的形成机制及防控研究综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 36-46.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn