Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (1): 59-72    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.01.06
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
深埋隧道岩爆段地应力反演与围岩破坏特征
李卫平1,林波2,段汝健1,李西亚1,白兴金1,何本国2*,李耀东1
1.中国水利水电第十四工程局有限公司, 云南 昆明 650041;2.东北大学深部金属矿智能开采与装备全国重点实验室, 辽宁 沈阳 110819
Inversion of in-situ stress and analysis of surrounding rock failure characteristics in rockburst sections of deep-buried tunnels
LI Weiping1, LIN Bo2, DUAN Rujian1, LI Xiya1, BAI Xingjin1, HE Benguo2*, LI Yaodong1
1. China Water Resources and Hydropower Fourteenth Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd., Kunming 650041, Yunnan, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Deep Metal Mining and Equipment, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, China
下载:  PDF (11657KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对高地应力条件下深埋TBM隧道施工中岩爆与应力型塌方频发的问题,围绕围岩破坏特征识别、初始地应力场反演及岩爆分级防控开展研究。基于对139个现场工程概况与高应力破坏案例的调研,研究表明:爆坑/塌腔的形成是高地应力、岩体结构面及围岩性质共同作用的结果,其具体轮廓形态则主要受控于结构面的数量、尺度及空间组合关系。进一步构建考虑地表地形与断层-地层结构的三维地质模型,以水压致裂法获得的8个测点地应力为约束,设置自重、水平挤压与剪切等5类边界工况,并采用多元线性回归实现区域三维初始地应力场反演,反演结果与实测值复相关系数R为0.91,吻合度较高。沿隧道轴线提取应力分布规律,识别断层邻近应力突增区并完成施工区间风险分级;以最大埋深约1 687 m典型断面为例,提取TBM护盾内掌子面前后不同位置的应力响应,表明掌子面附近应力集中显著,开挖后围岩应力释放并随时间发生重分布,围岩出护盾后及时支护可有效抑制应力释放与岩爆风险。最后提出“超前预报-分级防控-动态监测-安全防护”的施工原则,并给出轻微-中等-强烈岩爆的分级治理与支护组合措施。研究成果可为深部复合地层TBM隧道岩爆风险评估与支护设计提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李卫平
林波
段汝健
李西亚
白兴金
何本国
李耀东
关键词:  深埋隧道  岩爆  地应力反演  多元线性回归分析方法  分级支护    
Abstract: Frequent rockbursts and stress-induced collapses during the construction of deep-buried TBM tunnels under high in-situ stress were investigated through failure characterization, initial stress-field inversion, and graded rockburst control. Based on field investigations, 139 cases of high-stress damage were collected. The results showed that rockburst craters and collapse cavities were jointly controlled by high in-situ stress, structural planes, and surrounding rock properties, whereas their boundary morphology was mainly determined by the number, scale, and spatial combination of structural planes. A three-dimensional geological model considering surface topography and fault-bedding structures was established. Constrained by in-situ stress data from eight hydraulic-fracturing measurement points, five boundary conditions, including self-weight, horizontal extrusion, and shear, were applied, and the regional three-dimensional initial stress field was inverted using multiple linear regression. Good agreement was obtained between the inverted and measured results, with a multiple correlation coefficient of 0.91. Stress distribution along the tunnel axis was extracted, and zones of abrupt stress increase near faults were identified for risk classification. For a typical section with a maximum burial depth of about 1 687 m, significant stress concentration was observed near the tunnel face, while post-excavation stress release and time-dependent redistribution were identified. Timely support after the surrounding rock exited the shield was shown to effectively reduce stress release and rockburst risk. Finally, a construction strategy involving advance prediction, graded control, dynamic monitoring, and safety protection was proposed, together with corresponding measures for slight, moderate, and intense rockbursts.
Key words:  deep-buried tunnel    rockburst    in-situ stress snversion    multiple linear regression analysis method    hierarchical support
发布日期:  2026-03-23     
中图分类号:  U43  
  U45  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金青年资助项目A类(52525808)
作者简介:  李卫平(1980— ),男,河南焦作人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为水利水电工程、公路工程、铁路工程建设管理. E-mail: 123397611@qq.com. *通信作者简介:何本国(1984— ),男,安徽庐江人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为岩土工程. E-mail: hebenguo@mail.neu.edu.cn
引用本文:    
李卫平, 林波, 段汝健, 李西亚, 白兴金, 何本国, 李耀东. 深埋隧道岩爆段地应力反演与围岩破坏特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 59-72.
LI Weiping, LIN Bo, DUAN Rujian, LI Xiya, BAI Xingjin, HE Benguo, LI Yaodong. Inversion of in-situ stress and analysis of surrounding rock failure characteristics in rockburst sections of deep-buried tunnels. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(1): 59-72.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I1/59
[1] 张世殊, 赵小平. 水利水电深部地下工程: 地质环境、围岩灾变与技术挑战[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2026, 58(1): 1-17. ZHANG Shishu, ZHAO Xiaoping. Concept and key technical challenges of deep underground hydraulic and hydropower engineering[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2026, 58(1): 1-17.
[2] 谢和平, 张茹, 张泽天, 等. 深地科学与深地工程技术探索与思考[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(11): 3959-3978. XIE Heping, ZHANG Ru, ZHANG Zetian, et al. Reflections and explorations on deep earth science and deep earth engineering technology[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(11): 3959-3978.
[3] 康红普. 我国煤矿巷道围岩控制技术发展70年及展望[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(1): 1-30. KANG Hongpu. Seventy years development and prospects of strata control technologies for coal mine roadways in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(1): 1-30.
[4] 邱士利, 冯夏庭, 江权, 等. 深埋隧洞应变型岩爆倾向性评估的新数值指标研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(10): 2007-2017. QIU Shili, FENG Xiating, JIANG Quan, et al. A novel numerical index for estimating strainburst vulnerability in deep tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(10): 2007-2017.
[5] 黄志平, 黄紫怡, 于群, 等. 深埋隧洞强岩爆微震活动特征分析及多元信息预警[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2024, 64(5): 534-541. HUANG Zhiping, HUANG Ziyi, YU Qun, et al. Analysis of microseismic activity characteristics of strong rockburst in deep-buried tunnel and multi-information early warning[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2024, 64(5): 534-541.
[6] 梁伟章, 赵国彦. 深部硬岩长短期岩爆风险评估研究综述[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(1): 19-39. LIANG Weizhang, ZHAO Guoyan. A review of long-term and short-term rockburst risk evaluations in deep hard rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(1): 19-39.
[7] HU J, HE M C, LI H R, et al. Rockburst hazard control using the excavation compensation method(ECM): a case study in the Qinling water conveyance tunnel[J]. Engineering, 2024, 34: 154-163.
[8] 石长岩. 红透山铜矿深部开采岩爆倾向性及监测控制研究[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2009: 16-33. SHI Changyan. Study on rock burst tendentiousness and monitoring control in Hongtoushan Copper Mine[D]. Shenyang:Dongbei University, 2009: 16-33.
[9] 薛翊国, 孔凡猛, 杨为民, 等. 川藏铁路沿线主要不良地质条件与工程地质问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(3): 445-468. XUE Yiguo, KONG Fanmeng, YANG Weimin, et al. Main unfavorable geological conditions and engineering geological problems along Sichuan-Tibet Railway[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(3): 445-468.
[10] 蔡遵乐, 梁庆国, 曹生慧, 等. 高地应力软岩隧道的变形规律[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 21-32. CAI Zunle, LIANG Qingguo, CAO Shenghui, et al. The deformation pattern of soft rock tunnels with high ground stress[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 21-32.
[11] 钱蓉, 邓树新, 王明洋, 等. 深部工程围岩松动圈范围确定及变形破坏机理[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(6): 839-845. QIAN Rong, DENG Shuxin, WANG Mingyang, et al. Range determination and deformation failure mechanism of loosening zone of surrounding rock in deep engineering[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2023, 51(6): 839-845.
[12] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 等. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60. LI Qidi, LIANG Qingguo, ZHOU Ren, et al. Analysis of initial ground stress field and prediction of rockurst in Ganqing Tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[13] 冯夏庭, 肖亚勋, 丰光亮, 等. 岩爆孕育过程研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(4): 649-673. FENG Xiating, XIAO Yaxun, FENG Guangliang, et al. Study on the development process of rockbursts[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(4): 649-673.
[14] 高明忠, 王明耀, 谢晶, 等. 深部煤岩原位扰动力学行为研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(8): 2691-2703. GAO Mingzhong, WANG Mingyao, XIE Jing, et al. In-situ disturbed mechanical behavior of deep coal rock[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(8): 2691-2703.
[15] 刘泉声, 王中伟. 基于数字图像处理的岩石数值模拟研究进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(增刊2): 3286-3296. LIU Quansheng, WANG Zhongwei. Research progress of rock numerical simulation based on digital image processing[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(Suppl.2): 3286-3296.
[16] 江权, 冯夏庭, 李邵军, 等. 高应力下大型硬岩地下洞室群稳定性设计优化的裂化-抑制法及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(6): 1081-1101. JIANG Quan, FENG Xiating, LI Shaojun, et al. Cracking-restraint design method for large underground caverns with hard rock under high geostress condition and its practical application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(6): 1081-1101.
[17] 景锋, 盛谦, 张勇慧, 等. 我国原位地应力测量与地应力场分析研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2011(增刊2): 51-58. JING Feng, SHENG Qian, ZHANG Yonghui, et al. Study advance on in-site geostress measurement and analysis of initial geostress field in China[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011(Suppl.2): 51-58.
[18] 赵阳升. 岩体力学发展的一些回顾与若干未解之百年问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(7):1297-1336. ZHAO Yangsheng. Retrospection on the development of rock mass mechanics and the summary of some unsolved centennial problems[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(7):1297-1336.
[19] KAVANAGH K T, CLOUGH R W. Finite element applications in the characterization of elastic solids[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1971, 7(1): 11-23.
[20] 杨志法. 关于岩石力学当前发展战略的一些看法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1994, 16(1): 112-113. YANG Zhifa. Some views on the current development strategy of rock mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 16(1): 112-113.
[21] 孙钧, 黄伟. 岩石力学参数弹塑性反演问题的优化方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1992, 11(3): 221-229. SUN Jun, HUANG Wei. An optimization method for the elastoplastic inversion of parameters in rock mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engi-neering, 1992, 11(3): 221-229.
[22] 王芝银, 李云鹏. 地下工程围岩粘弹塑性参数反分析[J]. 水利学报, 1990, 21(9): 11-16. WANG Zhiyin, LI Yunpeng. Backanalysis of viscoelastic-plastic parameters of surrounding rock in underground engineering[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1990, 21(9): 11-16.
[23] 冯夏庭, 张治强, 杨成祥,等. 位移反分析的进化神经网络方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1999, 18(5): 529-533. FENG Xiating, ZHANG Zhiqiang, YANG Chengxiang, et al. Study on genetic neural network method of displacement back analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1999, 18(5): 529-533.
[24] 周洪福, 聂德新. 水电工程坝址区构造应力场三维数值反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(3): 785-791. ZHOU Hongfu, NIE Dexin. 3D-numerical back analysis of tectonic stress field in dam site of hydropower project[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(3): 785-791.
[25] 杨林德. 岩土工程反分析方法研究的发展方向[C] //全国岩土工程反分析学术研讨会暨黄岩石窟(锦绣黄岩)岩石力学问题讨论会文集. 台州:中国岩石力学与工程学会, 2006: 19-27.
[1] 刘吉诚,张雪峰,甄玉超,林庆涛,杨成贺,路德春,杜修力. 小净距隧道施工地层和隧道变形特征及韧性评价研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 73-87.
[2] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 杨家伟, 蔡遵乐. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[3] 宫凤强, 何志超. 钻孔卸压防治岩爆机理的试验研究进展与展望[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 1-23.
[4] 赵毅. TBM强岩爆掘进段小导洞超前应力释放施工技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 78-85.
[5] 马春驰, 陈柯竹, 李天斌, 曾俊, 马佳骥. 基于GDEM的应力-结构型岩爆数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 85-94.
[6] 刘宏达,杨天亮,张冬梅. 基于离散元分析的砂土深埋盾构隧道土压力计算方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(2): 31-40.
[7] 焦玉勇, 张为社, 欧光照, 邹俊鹏, 陈光辉. 深埋隧道钻爆法开挖段突涌水灾害的形成机制及防控研究综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 36-46.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn