Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2023, Vol. 5 Issue (4): 72-80    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2023.04.08
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
滇中引水松林隧洞高外水压力作用数值模拟分析
王新越1,王如宾1*,王丹2,向天兵3,王鹏2,黄威1,张建平1,徐卫亚1
1.河海大学岩土工程科学研究所, 江苏 南京 210098;2.云南省滇中引水工程有限公司, 云南 昆明 650000; 3.中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司, 云南 昆明 650051
Numerical simulation analysis of high external water pressure effect in Songlin Tunnel of Central Yunnan Water Diversion
WANG Xinyue1, WANG Rubin1*, WANG Dan2, XIANG Tianbing3, WANG Peng2, HUANG Wei1, ZHANG Jianping1, XU Weiya1
1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, China;
2. Yunnan Dianzhong Water Diversion Engineering Co., Ltd., Kunming 650000, Yunnan, China;
3. Kunming Engineering Co., Ltd., Power Construction Corporation, Kunming 650051, Yunnan, China
下载:  PDF (8689KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为揭示固结灌浆与衬砌排水等措施对深埋隧洞衬砌高外水压力作用影响规律,选取滇中引水工程松林隧洞为研究对象,开展深埋引水隧洞高外水压力作用数值模拟计算,研究不同灌浆圈参数和衬砌排水条件下隧洞围岩渗流场和衬砌结构外水压力变化规律,并提出隧洞围岩固结灌浆与衬砌排水优化设计方案建议。研究结果表明:隧洞围岩设置灌浆圈和衬砌设置排水孔均能有效降低衬砌结构外水压力,灌浆圈厚度越大,渗透系数越小,堵水效果越好;衬砌排水孔越多,衬砌结构外水压力越小,但需要考虑衬砌安全性合理设置;建议灌浆圈厚度取6~8 m,灌浆圈渗透系数取围岩渗透系数的1/60~1/40,排水孔数量为2~3个,在此区间进行设计较为合理。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王新越
王如宾
王丹
向天兵
王鹏
黄威
张建平
徐卫亚
关键词:  滇中引水隧洞  高外水压力  灌浆圈参数  排水孔  渗流场    
Abstract: To investigate the effects of measures such as grouting and lining drainage on high external water pressure acting on lining in deep-buried tunnels, the Songlin Tunnel of Yunnan Central Water Diversion Project was selected as the study object. Numerical simulation calculation was conducted to investigate the variation of the surrounding rock seepage field and lining structure external water pressure under different grouting ring parameters and lining drainage conditions in the deep-buried water diversion tunnel. Based on the results, proposals for optimizing the design of surrounding rock consolidation grouting and lining drainage were presented. The research findings revealed that setting grouting rings and lining drainage holes in the surrounding rock could effectively reduce the external water pressure on the lining structure. The thicker the grouting ring was, the smaller the permeability coefficient was, and the better the water plugging effect was. The more drainage holes in the lining, the smaller the external water pressure on the lining structure, but the safety of the lining should be considered when setting the drainage holes. It was recommended that the grouting ring thickness should be set at 6-8 meters, and the grouting ring conductivity coefficient should be set at 1/60 to 1/40 of the permeability coefficient of the surrounding rock. The number of drainage holes should be set at 2-3, which was a more reasonable design range.
Key words:  Central Yunnan Water Diversion    high external water pressure    grouting circle parameter    drainage hole    seepage field
收稿日期:  2023-08-04      修回日期:  2023-08-31      发布日期:  2023-12-19     
中图分类号:  TV672  
基金资助: 云南省重大科技专项计划资助项目(202102AF080001)
通讯作者:  王如宾(1979—),男,山东聊城人,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为岩石力学与工程安全。    E-mail:  rbwang@hhu.edu.cn
作者简介:  王新越(1999—),男,江苏盐城人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为高外水压力作用机理. E-mail:15295756973@163.com
引用本文:    
王新越, 王如宾, 王丹, 向天兵, 王鹏, 黄威, 张建平, 徐卫亚. 滇中引水松林隧洞高外水压力作用数值模拟分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 72-80.
WANG Xinyue, WANG Rubin, WANG Dan, XIANG Tianbing, WANG Peng, HUANG Wei, ZHANG Jianping, XU Weiya. Numerical simulation analysis of high external water pressure effect in Songlin Tunnel of Central Yunnan Water Diversion. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 72-80.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2023/V5/I4/72
[1] 宋岳,贾国臣,滕杰. 隧洞外水压力折减系数工程地质研究[J]. 水利水电工程设计, 2007, 26(3):38-40. SONG Yue, JIA Guochen, TENG Jie. The engineering geological research for the reduction factor of tunnel external water pressure[J]. Design of Water Resources and Hydroelectric Engineering, 2007, 26(3):38-40.
[2] 张有天. 隧洞及压力管道设计中的外水压力修正系数[J]. 水力发电, 1996, 22(12):30-34. ZHANG Youtian. Correction factor of external water pressure in design of tunnel and penstock[J]. Water Power, 1996, 22(12):30-34.
[3] 蒋忠信. 深埋岩溶隧道水压力的预测与防治[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2005, 22(6):37-40. JIANG Zhongxin. Calculation and control of water pressure on Kast deep tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2005, 22(6):37-40.
[4] 刘立鹏,汪小刚,贾志欣,等.水岩分算隧道衬砌外水压力折减系数取值方法[J]. 岩土工程学报,2013,35(3):495-500. LIU Lipeng, WANG Xiaogang, JIA Zhixin, et al. Method to determine reduction factor of water pressure acting on tunnel linings using water-rock independent calculation methodology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(3):495-500.
[5] 李伟,杨丹,李庆. 高水压山岭隧道衬砌结构水压力特征研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2013, 30(11):57-61. LI Wei, YANG Dan, LI Qing. Study on the characteristic of water pressure upon lining in subject to high hydraulic pressure mountain tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2013, 30(11):57-61.
[6] 张治国,汪嘉程,赵其华,等. 富水山岭地区邻近补水断层隧道结构上的水头分布解析求解[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(增刊2):3378-3394. ZHANG Zhiguo, WANG Jiacheng, ZHAO Qihua, et al. Analytical solution of head distribution on tunnel structure adjacent water-filled fault in water-enriched mountain region[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(Suppl.2):3378-3394.
[7] 李林毅,阳军生,高超,等. 考虑注浆圈作用的体外排水隧道渗流场解析研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(1):133-141. LI Linyi, YANG Junsheng, GAO Chao, et al. Analytical study on seepage field of tunnels with external drainage considering effect of grouting rings[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1):133-141.
[8] EL TANI M. Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2003, 18(1):49-55.
[9] FERNANDEZ G, MOON J. Excavation-induced hydraulic conductivity reduction around a tunnel- part 1: guideline for estimate of ground water inflow rate[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(5):560-566.
[10] 张庆松,王德明,李术才,等. 断层破碎带隧道突水突泥模型试验系统研制与应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(3):417-426. ZHANG Qingsong, WANG Deming, LI Shucai, et al. Development and application of model test system for inrush of water and mud of tunnel in fault rupture zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(3):417-426.
[11] 于丽,方霖,董宇苍,王明年,等. 基于围岩渗透影响范围的隧道外水压力计算方法模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(10):2288-2298. YU Li, FANG Lin, DONG Yucang. et al. Research on the evaluation method of the hydraulic pressure on tunnel lining according to the range of seepage field[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(10):2288-2298.
[12] 傅睿智,郭凯,黄鹤程,等. 复合衬砌外水压力模型试验研究[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(6):192-197. FU Ruizhi, GUO Kai, HUANG Hecheng, et al. Model test study for external water pressure on composite lining[J]. Yangtze River, 2019, 50(6):192-197.
[13] 李林毅,阳军生,高超,等. 排水管堵塞引起的高铁隧道结构变形与渗流场特征模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2021,43(4):715-724. LI Linyi, YANG Junsheng, GAO Chao, et al. Simulation tests on structural deformation and seepage field of high-speed railway tunnels under drainage clogging[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(4):715-724.
[14] LI Shucai, LIU Hongliang, LI Liping, et al. Large scale three-dimensional seepage analysis model test and numerical simulation research on undersea tunnel[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2016, 59:510-520.
[15] ARJNOI P, JEONG J H, KIM C Y, et al. Effect of drainage conditions on porewater pressure distributions and lining stresses in drained tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(4):376-389.
[16] 张进. 富水环境下隧道地下水限量排放的衬砌外水压力分析[J].四川建筑,2020,40(5):96-98.
[17] 姚右文,任旭华,张继勋. 富水区衬砌-围岩接触关系对外水压力影响研究[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(6):52-55. YAO Youwen, REN Xuhua, ZHANG Jixun. Analysis of impact of contact relationship between lining and surrounding rock on external water pressure in rich water areas[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University(Natural Sciences), 2015, 37(6):52-55.
[18] 王克忠,倪绍虎,吴慧. 深部隧洞裂隙围岩渗透特性及衬砌外水压力变化规律[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(1):168-176. WANG Kezhong, NI Shaohu, WU Hui. Seepage properties and external hydraulic pressure acting on tunnel lining in fractured rock around deep-buried tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(1):168-176.
[19] 伍国军,陈卫忠,谭贤君,等. 饱和岩体渗透性动态演化对引水隧洞稳定性的影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(11):2172-2182. WU Guojun, CHEN Weizhong, TAN Xianjun, et al. Effect of the permeability dynamic evolution of saturated rock on the stability of diversion tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(11):2172-2182.
[20] 徐磊,姜磊,金永苗,等. 灌浆圈劣化条件下高外水隧洞长期服役性态演化[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(6):1842-1852. XU Lei, JIANG Lei, JIN Yongmiao, et al. Long-term service performance analysis of the tunnel under high external water pressure considering grouting zone deterioration[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(6):1842-1852.
[21] HOIEN A H, NILSEN B. Rock mass grouting in the løren tunnel:case study with the main focus on the groutability and feasibility of drill parameter interpretation[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(3):967-983.
[22] 袁溢. 深埋岩溶富水地层铁路隧道泄水洞设计[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(3):834-839. YUAN Yi. Design of railway tunnel drainage tunnel in the stratum with large water volume in the Karst area with large depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(3):834-839.
[1] 黄昕, 谷冠思, 张子新, 李昀. 考虑渗流的泥水平衡盾构隧道稳定性数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 28-38.
[1] QIAN Qihu. Scientific use of the urban underground space to construction the harmonious livable and beautiful city[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 1 -7 .
[2] DENG Mingjiang, LIU Bin. Challenges, countermeasures and development direction of geological forward-prospecting for TBM cluster tunneling in super-long tunnels[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 8 -19 .
[3] DING Xiuli, ZHANG Yuting, ZHANG Chuanjian, YAN Tianyou, HUANG Shuling. Review on countermeasures and their adaptability evaluation to tunnels crossing active faults[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 20 -35 .
[4] JIAO Yuyong, ZHANG Weishe, OU Guangzhao, ZOU Junpeng, CHEN Guanghui. Review of the evolution and mitigation of the water-inrush disaster in drilling-and-blasting excavated deep-buried tunnels[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 36 -46 .
[5] ZHANG Qingsong, ZHANG Lianzhen, LI Peng, FENG Xiao. New progress in grouting reinforcement theory of water-rich soft stratum in underground engineering[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 47 -57 .
[6] XIA Kaiwen, XU Ying, CHEN Rong. Dynamic tests of rocks subjected to simulated deep underground environments[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 58 -75 .
[7] HONG Kairong. Study on rock breaking and wear of TBM hob in high-strength high-abrasion stratum[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 76 -85 .
[8] TAN Zhongsheng. Application experimental study of high-strength lattice girders with heat treatment in tunnel engineering[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 86 -92 .
[9] CHEN Jianxun, LUO Yanbin. The stability of structure and its control technology for lager-span loess tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 93 -101 .
[10] JING Hongwen, YU Liyuan, SU Haijian, GU Jincai, YIN Qian. Development and application of catastrophic experiment system for water inrush in surrounding rock of deep tunnels[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 102 -110 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn