Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
扩建洞库爆破振动对运营洞库稳定性影响
王敬奎1,彭建宇2,王者超2,李康林2
(1.中海油石化工程有限公司,山东 青岛 266000;2.辽宁省深部工程与智能技术重点实验室,沈阳 110819)
The influence of blasting vibration of extended cavern on the stability of operating cavern
WANG Jingkui1, PENG Jianyu2, WANG Zhechao2, LI Kanglin2
(1.CNOOC Petrochemical Engineering Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China;(2.Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Deep Engineering and Intelligent Technology, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, China)
下载:  PDF (1153KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为确保已建运营洞库的稳定性,对邻近扩建洞库钻爆法开挖进行爆破振动分析,明确其对已建运营洞库稳定性的影响。依托国内某地下水封洞库工程,采用LS-DYNA建立三维数值计算模型,开展爆破振动模拟,并通过峰值振速、有效应力等评价其对运营洞库影响。研究结果表明:主洞室1监测点振速在0.1~0.8 cm/s之间,主洞室2监测点振速在0.045~0.35 cm/s之间,且峰值速度最大值出现在与波的传播方向较为一致的方向;最大单段炸药量影响峰值振速(合速度)和有效应力,炸药量越多,振速值和有效应力越高,峰值振速最大可增大200%;在最大单段炸药量小于65 kg的条件下,距爆源最近处的有效应力和合速度均小于安全规程规定值,扩建洞库爆破施工对运营洞库影响较小,无安全隐患;结合现场爆破振动监测数据,验证了此模拟结果的正确性。此研究成果可为水封洞库扩建工程爆破设计提供一定理论参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王敬奎
彭建宇
王者超
李康林
关键词:  扩建洞库  爆破振动  稳定性  最大单段炸药量    
Abstract: In order to ensure the stability of the existing operation cavern, the blasting vibration analysis of the drilling and blasting excavation of the adjacent expansion cavern was carried out to clarify its influence on the stability of the existing operation cavern. Based on a domestic underground water-sealed cavern project, ANSYS/LS-DYNA was used to establish a three-dimensional numerical calculation model to carry out blasting vibration simulation, and its impact on the operating cavern was evaluated by peak vibration velocity and effective stress. The results showed that the vibration velocity of the monitoring point in the main cavern 1 was between 0.1~0.8 cm/s, and the vibration velocity of the monitoring point in the main cavern 2 was between 0.045~0.35 cm/s, and the maximum peak velocity appears in the direction that was consistent with the propagation direction of the wave. The maximum single-stage explosive quantity affects the peak vibration velocity (combined velocity) and effective stress. The more the explosive quantity, the higher the vibration velocity and effective stress, peak vibration velocity could be increased by up to 200%. Under the condition that the maximum single-stage explosive quantity was less than 65 kg, the effective stress and the combined velocity at the nearest distance from the explosion source were less than the values specified in the safety regulations. The blasting construction of the expansion cavern had little impact on the operating cavern and had no potential safety hazard.  Combined with the on-site blasting vibration monitoring data, the correctness of the simulation results was verified. The research results can provide some theoretical reference for the blasting design of water-sealed cavern expansion project. 
Key words:  expansion cavern    blasting vibration    stability    the maximum single-stage explosive quantity
收稿日期:  2023-11-21      修回日期:  2024-01-31      发布日期:  2024-03-01     
中图分类号:  TE8  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(51779045);辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”资助项目(XLYC1807029)
作者简介:  王敬奎(1972—),男,山东单县人,研究员,主要研究方向为地下水封洞库设计。E-mail:wjk@enpal.cn
引用本文:    
王敬奎, 彭建宇, 王者超, 李康林. 扩建洞库爆破振动对运营洞库稳定性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
WANG Jingkui, PENG Jianyu, WANG Zhechao, LI Kanglin. The influence of blasting vibration of extended cavern on the stability of operating cavern. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-.
链接本文:  
[1] 吕玺琳, 赵庾成, 曾盛. 砂层中盾构隧道开挖面稳定性物理模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 67-76.
[2] 李相兵, 梁波, 鲁思源. 考虑多因素影响的双侧壁导坑法施工参数研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 39-48.
[3] 赵文强, 周建伟, 袁兆廷, 吴铭祥, 蒋亚龙, 耿大新, 刘长红. 大跨径地下罐室穹顶预留中心岩柱开挖施工围岩稳定性模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 81-89.
[4] 李胜, 熊自明, 刘一鸣, 李志浩. 基于改进DBSCAN算法的岩体结构面智能识别方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 49-58.
[5] 石宗涛. 济南黄河隧道泥水盾构开挖面稳定性分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 71-77.
[6] 赵兴东,李洋洋,张姝婧,陈玉民,王成龙,王玺. 超深井筒开挖扰动应力响应特征分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 19-28.
[7] 余海岁, 庄培芝. 岩土介质小孔收缩理论及其在隧道工程中的应用[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(4): 13-32.
[8] 左宇军,万入祯,孙文吉斌,刘镐,林健云,娄义黎. 不同开挖工法对含煤系岩层隧道围岩稳定性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(4): 64-74.
[9] 高源, 杨天鸿, 辛全明, 刘飞跃. 北山隧道式大跨度地下四季滑雪场围岩稳定性研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 109-115.
[10] 闫保旭,朱万成,侯晨. 地下采场二步采充填体最大暴露高度理论分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(2): 100-106.
[11] 陈建勋, 罗彦斌. 大跨度黄土公路隧道结构稳定性及控制技术研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 93-101.
[1] QIAN Qihu. Scientific use of the urban underground space to construction the harmonious livable and beautiful city[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 1 -7 .
[2] ZHOU Caigui, LI Jing, LIANG Qingguo, CHEN Kelin. Comparison of water inflow prediction methods of hydraulic diversion tunnels during construction[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 32 -44 .
[3] HUANG Zheng, YE Zhangqian, ZHANG Jiawei, PENG Zimao, YAN Zhanshuo. The influence of intumescent fire retardant coating on the fire resistance of assembled frame tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -16 .
[4] ZHANG Ning, HUANG Xinjie, WANG Chuan, XU Bin, ZHANG Jiancheng, ZHANG Bo. Experimental and numerical simulation of high-pressure water jet cutting concrete[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 47 -56 .
[5] . [J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2): 124 -127 .
[6] JIA Rui, YANG Gang, ZHENG Gang. Influence of shield tunnel construction history on seismic response of tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 41 -51 .
[7] WANG Qiuzhe, HAN Rui, BAI Xiaoxiao, ZHAO Kai. Seismic stability of immersed tunnel under locked backfill[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 71 -77 .
[8] HAO Junsuo, LIU Junfeng, LIU Hao, ZHAO Mingfan. Inducement and prevention technology of secondary disasters of water and mud inrush in tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 81 -92 .
[9] DONG Longjun, WANG Junhui, MA Ju. Response and support suggestions of surrounding rock of underground cavern under different microseismic source mechanism[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(3): 68 -76 .
[10] ZHAO Zhihong, GUO Tiecheng, LIN Tao, CHEN Sicong. Characteristics of excavation damaged zone in fractured rock mass[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(3): 77 -86 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn