Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
深埋隧道岩爆段地应力反演与围岩破坏特征
李卫平1,林波2,段汝健1,李西亚1,白兴金1,何本国2*,李耀东1
(1. 中国水利水电第十四工程局有限公司 云南 昆明  650041;
2. 东北大学深部金属矿智能开采与装备全国重点实验室 辽宁 沈阳 110819)
Inversion of in-situ stress and analysis of surrounding rock failure characteristics in rockburst sections of deep-buried tunnels
LI Weiping¹, LIN Bo², DUAN Rujian¹, LI Xiya¹, BAI Xingjin¹, HE Benguo2*, LI Yaodong¹
(1. China Water Resources and Hydropower Fourteenth Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd., Kunming 650041, Yunnan, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Deep Metal Mining and Equipment, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, China)
下载:  PDF (3313KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对高地应力条件下深埋TBM隧道施工中岩爆与应力型塌方频发的问题,围绕围岩破坏特征识别、初始地应力场反演及岩爆分级防控开展研究。基于现场调研获取工程概况与高应力破坏案例共139个,归纳爆坑/塌腔形成受高地应力、岩体结构面及围岩性质等共同控制,其轮廓形态主要由结构面的数量、尺度及空间组合关系决定。进一步构建考虑地表地形与断层—分层结构的三维地质模型,以水压致裂法获得的8个测点地应力为约束,设置自重、水平挤压与剪切等5类边界工况,并采用多元线性回归实现区域三维初始地应力场反演,反演结果与实测值复相关系数R为0.91,吻合度较高。沿隧道轴线提取应力分布规律,识别断层邻近应力突增区并完成施工区间风险分级;以最大埋深约1 687 m典型断面为例,提取TBM护盾内掌子面前后不同位置的应力响应,表明掌子面附近应力集中显著,开挖后围岩应力释放并随时间发生重分布,围岩出护盾后及时支护可有效抑制应力释放与岩爆风险。最后提出“超前预报-分级防控-动态监测-安全防护”的施工原则,并给出轻微-中等-强烈岩爆的分级治理与支护组合措施。研究成果可为深部复合地层TBM隧道岩爆风险评估与支护设计提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李卫平
林波
段汝健
李西亚
白兴金
何本国
李耀东
关键词:  深埋隧道  岩爆  地应力反演  多元线性回归分析方法  分级支护    
Abstract: Frequent rockbursts and stress-induced collapses during the construction of deep-buried TBM tunnels under high in-situ stress were investigated through failure characterization, initial stress-field inversion, and graded rockburst control. Based on field investigations, 139 cases of high-stress damage were collected. The results showed that rockburst craters and collapse cavities were jointly controlled by high in-situ stress, structural planes, and surrounding rock properties, whereas their boundary morphology was mainly determined by the number, scale, and spatial combination of structural planes. A three-dimensional geological model considering surface topography and fault-bedding structures was established. Constrained by in-situ stress data from eight hydraulic-fracturing measurement points, five boundary conditions, including self-weight, horizontal extrusion, and shear, were applied, and the regional three-dimensional initial stress field was inverted using multiple linear regression. Good agreement was obtained between the inverted and measured results, with a multiple correlation coefficient of 0.91. Stress distribution along the tunnel axis was extracted, and zones of abrupt stress increase near faults were identified for risk classification. For a typical section with a maximum burial depth of about 1 687 m, significant stress concentration was observed near the tunnel face, while post-excavation stress release and time-dependent redistribution were identified. Timely support after the surrounding rock exited the shield was shown to effectively reduce stress release and rockburst risk. Finally, a construction strategy involving advance prediction, graded control, dynamic monitoring, and safety protection was proposed, together with corresponding measures for slight, moderate, and intense rockbursts.
Key words:  deep-buried tunnel    rockburst    in-situ stress snversion    multiple linear regression analysis method    hierarchical support
收稿日期:  2025-12-11      修回日期:  2026-01-22      发布日期:  2026-03-06     
中图分类号:  U43  
  U45  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金青年资助项目A类 (52525808)
通讯作者:  何本国(1984—),男,安徽庐江人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为岩土工程。    E-mail:  hebenguo@mail.neu.edu.cn
作者简介:  李卫平(1980—),男,山东高唐人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向水利水电工程、公路工程、铁路工程建设管理。 E-mail: 123397611@qq.com
引用本文:    
李卫平, 林波, 段汝健, 李西亚, 白兴金, 何本国, 李耀东. 深埋隧道岩爆段地应力反演与围岩破坏特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
LI Weiping, LIN Bo, DUAN Rujian, LI Xiya, BAI Xingjin, HE Benguo, LI Yaodong. Inversion of in-situ stress and analysis of surrounding rock failure characteristics in rockburst sections of deep-buried tunnels. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-18.
链接本文:  
[1] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 杨家伟, 蔡遵乐. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[2] 宫凤强, 何志超. 钻孔卸压防治岩爆机理的试验研究进展与展望[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 1-23.
[3] 赵毅. TBM强岩爆掘进段小导洞超前应力释放施工技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 78-85.
[4] 马春驰, 陈柯竹, 李天斌, 曾俊, 马佳骥. 基于GDEM的应力-结构型岩爆数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 85-94.
[5] 刘宏达,杨天亮,张冬梅. 基于离散元分析的砂土深埋盾构隧道土压力计算方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(2): 31-40.
[6] 焦玉勇, 张为社, 欧光照, 邹俊鹏, 陈光辉. 深埋隧道钻爆法开挖段突涌水灾害的形成机制及防控研究综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 36-46.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn