Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (2): 79-86    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.02.07
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
河谷高承压水断裂带隧洞围岩渗流演化规律和水害防治研究
余文杰1,2,杨健3,李振嵩3,齐吉琳1,曹瑞琅1,2*
1. 北京建筑大学土木与交通工程学院, 北京 100044;2. 中国水利水电科学研究院, 北京 100048;3. 中水珠江规划勘测设计有限公司, 广东 广州 510610
Study on seepage evolution law and water hazard control of tunnels in fracture zones with high confined water in river valleys
YU Wenjie1,2, YANG Jian3, LI Zhensong3, QI Jiling1, CAO Ruilang1,2*
1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;
2. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China;
3. China Water the Pearl River Planning, Survey and Design Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510610, Guangdong, China
下载:  PDF (13072KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对深埋隧洞穿越河谷高承压水断裂带面临水害风险的难题,系统分析了区域工程水文地质特征,揭示渗流场演化规律,开展地表定向钻灌浆渗控措施分析,并评价了应用效果。研究结果表明,高压富水区隧洞开挖后形成明显的地下水渗漏漏斗,强渗透性的断裂构造带会改变渗流路径,形成地下水汇聚,弱渗透围岩阻隔水流将造成局部高水头区,迫使隧洞建设同时面临突涌水和高水压问题。针对河谷高承压水断裂带实施地表定向钻灌浆,灌浆总长度748 m,预灌浆圈层厚度超过11.9 m,隧洞渗流量从7.0 m3/(d·m)降至1.1 m3/(d·m),外水压力降幅达到90.0%;定向钻注浆实现了对水力通道的有效封堵,提高了围岩完整性、降低岩体渗透性,减轻了隧洞涌水、高水压等水害风险。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
余文杰
杨健
李振嵩
齐吉琳
曹瑞琅
关键词:  断裂带  高承压水  渗流  定向钻灌浆  水害防治    
Abstract: To address the water hazard risks faced by deep-buried tunnels crossing high confined water fault zones in river valleys, the regional engineering hydrogeological characteristics were systematically analyzed, the evolution law of the seepage field was revealed, surface directional drilling grouting was proposed and applied as a water hazard control measure, and its application effect was evaluated. The results showed that an obvious groundwater drawdown funnel was formed after tunnel excavation in high-pressure water-rich areas. Highly permeable fault zones altered seepage paths and led to groundwater convergence, while low-permeability surrounding rock blocked water flow and created local high-head zones, exposing the tunnel construction to both water inrush and high external water pressure. Surface directional drilling grouting with a total length of 748 m was applied to the high confined water fault zone, increasing the thickness of the pre-grouted ring to more than 11.9 m. The tunnel seepage discharge decreased from 7.0 m3/(d·m)to 1.1 m3/(d·m), and the external water pressure was reduced by 90.0%. Directional drilling grouting effectively sealed hydraulic channels, improved the integrity of surrounding rock, reduced rock permeability, and mitigated water hazard risks such as tunnel water inrush and high water pressure.
Key words:  fracture zone    high confined water    seepage    directional drilling grouting    water hazard controlReceived: 2026-02-04    Revised: 2026-05-07    Accepted: 2026-05-11    Published: 2026-06-20
发布日期:  2026-07-07     
中图分类号:  U451.2  
  TV672.1  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52079150)
作者简介:  余文杰(2002— ),男,安徽黄山人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为富水区隧洞灾害防控. E-mail: 2108140124001@stu.bucea.edu.cn. *通信作者简介:曹瑞琅( 1985— ),男,河南周口人,正高级工程师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道及地下工程. E-mail: caorl@iwhr.com
引用本文:    
余文杰,杨健,李振嵩,齐吉琳,曹瑞琅. 河谷高承压水断裂带隧洞围岩渗流演化规律和水害防治研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 79-86.
YU Wenjie, YANG Jian, LI Zhensong, QI Jiling, CAO Ruilang. Study on seepage evolution law and water hazard control of tunnels in fracture zones with high confined water in river valleys. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(2): 79-86.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I2/79
[1] WANG C, FRIEDMAN M, WU W, et al. Hydraulic influences on the long-term performance of tunnels: a review[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2024, 48: 101329.
[2] 周彩贵, 李景, 梁庆国, 等. 水工引水隧洞施工涌水量预测方法对比[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 32-44. ZHOU Caigui, LI Jing, LIANG Qingguo, et al. Comparison of water inflow prediction methods of hydraulic diversion tunnels during construction[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 32-44.
[3] 许云, 张世涛, 刘皓. 滇中引水工程蔡家村隧洞涌水量预测[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2018, 29(1): 45-49. XU Yun, ZHANG Shitao, LIU Hao. Water inflow prediction of the Central Yunnan Water Diversion Caijiachun Tunnel[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2018, 29(1): 45-49.
[4] 于松, 颜天佑, 张国强, 等. 引江补汉雾渡河段深埋隧洞渗流与稳定性分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(4): 175-181. YU Song, YAN Tianyou, ZHANG Guoqiang, et al. Study on the effectiveness of advanced support in the deep-buried tunnels of the water diversion project from the Three Gorges Reservoir to Hanjiang River[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2024(4): 175-181.
[5] 郝俊锁, 刘俊峰, 刘浩, 等. 隧洞突水突泥次生灾害诱因与防治技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 81-92. HAO Junsuo, LIU Junfeng, LIU Hao, et al. Inducement and prevention technology of secondary disasters of water and mud inrush in tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 81-92.
[6] TAN Y Q, SMITH J V, LI C Q, et al. Predicting external water pressure and cracking of a tunnel lining by measuring water inflow rate[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 115-125.
[7] 丁长栋, 张宜虎, 李领, 等. 地下水封洞库帷幕灌浆试验与渗控效果分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(1): 64-72. DING Changdong, ZHANG Yihu, LI Ling, et al. Curtain grouting test and seepage control effect analysis of underground water-sealed oil storage[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(1): 64-72.
[8] 王新越, 王如宾, 王丹, 等. 滇中引水松林隧洞高外水压力作用数值模拟分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 72-80. WANG Xinyue, WANG Rubin, WANG Dan, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of high external water pressure effect in Songlin Tunnel of Central Yunnan Water Diversion[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 72-80.
[9] 李术才, 李利平, 孙子正, 等. 超长定向钻注装备关键技术分析及发展趋势[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 1-30. LI Shucai, LI Liping, SUN Zizheng, et al. Key technology analysis and development trend of the equipment for ultra-long directional drilling and grouting[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(1): 1-30.
[10] ZHANG Q C, LI J H, LIU B S, et al. Directional drainage grouting technology of coal mine water damage treatment[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 26: 264-270.
[11] 杨越,王朝阳,李龙标,等.水平定向钻探技术在水利水电深埋隧道注浆堵水的应用[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2025,56(增刊1):412-416. YANG Yue, WANG Chaoyang, LI Longbiao, et al. Application of horizontal directional drilling technology in grouting and water blocking of deep buried tunnels in water conservancy and hydropower[J].Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2025, 56(Suppl.1): 412-416.
[12] 蔡畅. 大涌水隧洞超前灌浆技术研究[J]. 水利建设与管理, 2022, 42(12): 36-44. CAI Chang. Study on advanced grouting technology of large water gushing tunnel[J]. Water Conservancy Construction and Management, 2022, 42(12): 36-44.
[1] 陈彰昕,王刚,李文锋,李科,江松,刘廷方. 基于改进DeepLabV3+和渗流算法的隧道裂缝检测研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 67-78.
[2] 彭益, 张文, 王汉勋, 张彬, 孙哲. 某海岛地下水封油库渗流场数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(1): 94-104.
[3] 丁长栋,张宜虎,李领,罗荣,范雷,丁祥,曹磊. 地下水封洞库帷幕灌浆试验与渗控效果分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(1): 64-72.
[4] 王新越, 王如宾, 王丹, 向天兵, 王鹏, 黄威, 张建平, 徐卫亚. 滇中引水松林隧洞高外水压力作用数值模拟分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 72-80.
[5] 吕玺琳, 赵庾成, 曾盛. 砂层中盾构隧道开挖面稳定性物理模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 67-76.
[6] 朱晓天. 渗流作用下粉质黏土地层超深基坑危害数值模拟分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 98-106.
[7] 黄昕, 谷冠思, 张子新, 李昀. 考虑渗流的泥水平衡盾构隧道稳定性数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 28-38.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn