Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  前沿综述 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
工程岩体灾害微震监测关键技术发展与应用综述
杨适菡1,李彪2*,毛浩宇1,叶天柱2
(1.四川大学水利水电学院山区河流保护与治理全国重点实验室 四川 成都 610065;
2. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院 四川 成都 610500)
A review of advances and applications of key technologies for microseismic monitoring of engineering rock mass hazards
Yang Shihan1,Li Biao2*,Mao Haoyu1,Ye Tianzhu2
(1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, China;
2.School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, Sichuan, China)
下载:  PDF (4363KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 微震监测利用传感器记录岩体破裂产生的弹性波信号,结合事件检测、震源定位及震源参数反演等技术,表征岩体破裂活动与损伤演化过程。当前在深埋隧洞、大型地下洞室、高陡边坡等工程场景中,监测结果易受场地噪声干扰与速度模型不确定性影响,预警指标选取和阈值确定也具有较强场地依赖性,部分方法的物理可解释性仍有待提高。本研究围绕工程岩体灾害微震监测的信号处理、震源机制与参数体系,以及预警与工程应用3个方面的关键技术,采用文献综述与典型工程案例对比分析相结合的方法,对代表性研究工作进行了总结。具体而言,在微震信号处理方面,分析微震监测中的降噪、事件识别与定位等关键环节,以及不同方法在各环节中的典型应用与适用性;在震源机制与参数体系方面,阐述以矩张量反演为核心的震源机制表征方法,归纳各类震源参数的计算方法以及考虑损伤映射的参数更新思路;在微震监测预警与工程应用方面,讨论静态阈值、趋势判别与多参数联合策略的应用,强调结合事件簇时空结构、机制演化及现场观测与数值模拟校核以提升预警的可靠性。综述表明,工程岩体微震监测的关键在于提升信号质量与定位可靠性、强化震源机制及参数解释,同时对多参数异常、事件时空聚集特征与现场工程条件开展联合判识,从而为灾害机理解释和失稳预警提供依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
杨适菡
李彪
毛浩宇
叶天柱
关键词:  微震监测  信号处理  震源机制  预警  工程应用    
Abstract: Microseismic monitoring uses sensor arrays to record elastic wave signals generated by rock fracturing and characterizes fracture activity and damage evolution in rock masses through event detection, source location, and source parameter inversion. In engineering settings such as deeply buried tunnels, large underground caverns, and high and steep slopes, monitoring results are often affected by site noise and velocity model uncertainties; the selection of warning indicators and the determination of thresholds are strongly site-dependent, and the physical interpretability of some methods remains limited. In this review, three key technical aspects of microseismic monitoring for engineering rock mass hazards were examined: signal processing, source mechanism analysis and parameter systems, and early warning and engineering applications. Representative studies were summarized through a literature review and comparative analysis of typical engineering cases. In terms of microseismic signal processing, key procedures including denoising, event identification, and source location were analyzed, and the applicability of representative methods was discussed. In terms of source mechanism analysis and parameter systems, source mechanism characterization based on moment tensor inversion was described, calculation methods for common source parameters were summarized, and damage-oriented parameter updating strategies were discussed. In terms of early warning and engineering applications, static thresholds, trend-based criteria, and joint strategies involving multiple parameters were reviewed, and the integration of spatiotemporal structures of event clusters, mechanism evolution, field observations, and numerical simulation validation was emphasized to improve warning reliability. The review showed that effective microseismic monitoring of engineering rock masses depended on improving signal quality and source location reliability, strengthening the interpretation of source mechanisms and source parameters, and jointly assessing anomalies in multiple parameters, event spatiotemporal clustering, and site engineering conditions. These integrated analyses provided a basis for hazard mechanism interpretation and instability warning.
Key words:  microseismic monitoring    signal processing    focal mechanism    early warning    engineering applications
收稿日期:  2026-02-09      修回日期:  2026-05-14      发布日期:  2026-10-20     
中图分类号:  TU45  
  P631  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(42277461)
通讯作者:  李彪(1990—),男,山东菏泽人,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为岩石力学与地下工程。    E-mail:  libiaoscu@163.com
作者简介:  杨适菡(1999—),男,四川康定人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为微震监测。E-mail: shihany@stu.scu.edu.cn
引用本文:    
杨适菡, 李彪, 毛浩宇, 叶天柱. 工程岩体灾害微震监测关键技术发展与应用综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
Yang Shihan, Li Biao, Mao Haoyu, Ye Tianzhu. A review of advances and applications of key technologies for microseismic monitoring of engineering rock mass hazards. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-33.
链接本文:  
[1] 段跃鑫,陈昕,沈奕,张忆,闫治国. 济南黄河隧道智慧防灾系统架构研究及验证[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 31-44.
[2] 钟浩,蔡先庆,孙浩,孔庆轩,张永平. 温度影响下砂岩三轴压缩行为:加荷特性、剪切变形及预测软件研发[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 81-95.
[3] 皮锦添,徐奴文,张丰收,毛浩宇,周相,李怀良,薄雾. 基于微震监测与DFN模拟的金川水电站尾闸室破坏机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 60-72.
[4] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 孙悦鹏, 周相, 丁新潮, 董林鹭. 基于微震能量分形维数的围岩变形预警[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 9-20.
[5] 林明熠, 刘芳, 孔维钧. 临近基坑地下供水管网变形破坏预警模型[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 68-78.
[6] 李天斌,巫晨笛,孟陆波,高美奔. 隧道坍方动态分析与综合预警方法研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 111-118.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn