锚索预应力损失与岩体蠕变耦合的理论分析

doi:10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2023.02.03

Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering

2023, Vol. 5

Issue (2): 33-41 DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2023.02.03

Research Article

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

Coupling analysis between prestress loss of anchor cables and creep of rocks

YANG Wendong¹, LIU Chuntian¹, ZHANG Xiang¹, CHEN Xiaopeng², JING Wenjun¹, ZHANG Lianzhen¹, WANG Bingqi¹, QIN Hao³

1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
2. POWERCHINA Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan, China;
3. Institute of Defense Engineering, AMS, PLA, Beijing 100850, China

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download:

PDF (5871KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on rheological mechanics and viscoelastic mechanics, a theoretical model for the coupling of prestress loss of anchor and creep of rock was established. Considering the influence of prestress loss when the prestressed anchor was used to reinforce rock mass, the creep equations of stable creep rock and unstable creep rock were derived, and the formula for calculating prestress of anchor with time was obtained. The results showed that the anchor prestress loss was faster in the period of completion of anchor tension; then the rate of prestress loss was gradually reduced and finally stabilized, and the creep of rock also became stable. By comparing the calculated results with the experimental results in existing literature, the curves of the two were consistent, which verified the correctness of the model. The comparison between the variation of anchor cable prestress at Jinping Hydropower Station and the calculation results of the theoretical model proves the accuracy of this research model applied to engineering examples. The theoretical analysis results established in this paper considering the coupling of anchor cable prestress loss and rock mass creep have a wider application range than previous coupling models, which is not only applicable to stable creep rock, but also to unstable creep rock. The warning of abnormal changes in anchor cable anchoring force and the long-term safe operation of slope engineering have extensive engineering application value.

Key words： anchor cable prestress loss creep coupling effect theoretical mode

Received: 17 April 2023 Published: 20 June 2023

ZTFLH:

TU452

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Wendong
	LIU Chuntian
	ZHANG Xiang
	CHEN Xiaopeng
	JING Wenjun
	ZHANG Lianzhen
	WANG Bingqi
	QIN Hao

Cite this article:

YANG Wendong,LIU Chuntian,ZHANG Xiang, et al. Coupling analysis between prestress loss of anchor cables and creep of rocks[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 33-41.

URL:

http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/EN/10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2023.02.03 OR http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/EN/Y2023/V5/I2/33

[1]	程良奎,张作瑂,杨志银.岩土加固实用技术[M].北京:地震出版社,1994.
[2]	朱杰兵,韩军,程良奎,等.三峡永久船闸预应力锚索加固对周边岩体力学性状影响的研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(6):853-857.
[3]	郭杏林. 预应力工程便携手册[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2008.
[4]	DANZIGER F A B, DANZIGER B R, PACHECO M P. The simultaneous use of piles and prestressed anchors in foundation design[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 87(3): 163-177.
[5]	KUMAR R, SHARMA K G, VARADARAJAN A. Post-peak response of some metamorphic rocks of India under high confining pressures[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2010, 47(8): 1357-1362.
[6]	CHUNG K. Prediction of pre- and post-peak behavior of concrete-filled circular steel tube columns under cyclic loads using fiber element method[J].Thin-Walled Structures, 2010, 48(2): 169-178.
[7]	HELENE P, PEREIRA M F, CASTRO P. Performance of a 40-year-old concrete bridge with embedded, prestressed galvanized strands[J]. Materials Performance, 2004, 43(10):42-45.
[8]	李英勇,王梦恕,张顶立,等.锚索预应力变化影响因素及模型研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(增刊1):3140-3146. LI Yingyong, WANG Mengshu, ZHANG Dingli, et al. Study on influential factors and model for variation of anchor cable prestress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(Suppl.1): 3140-3146.
[9]	李端友,汤平,李亦明. 三峡永久船闸一期工程岩锚预应力监测[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2000, 17(1): 39-42. LI Duanyou, TANG Ping, LI Yiming. Safety monitoring of rock anchor prestress during 1st stage construction of TGP’s permanent lock[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2000, 17(1): 39-42.
[10]	高大水,曾勇. 三峡永久船闸高边坡锚索预应力状态监测分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2001, 20(5):653-656.
[11]	何伟,刘秀平,游萍,等. 高边坡锚索预应力变化规律浅析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2009, 26(12): 89-92. HE Wei, LIU Xiuping, YOU Ping, et al. Analysis of prestress variation of cable in high slope reinforcement[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2009, 26(12): 89-92.
[12]	张永安,李峰,蒋鸥. 泥岩高边坡锚索预应力变化规律分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(9):1888-1892. ZHANG Yongan, LI Feng, JIANG Ou. Analysis of prestress variation of cable in mudstone high slope reinforcement[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(9): 1888-1892.
[13]	江权,陈建林,冯夏庭,等.大型地下洞室对穿预应力锚索失效形式与耦合模型[J].岩土力学,2013,34(8):2271-2279. JIANG Quan, CHEN Jianlin, FENG Xiating, et al. Failure format and interactive mechanism of prestressed thru-anchor cable in a large underground caverns[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(8): 2271-2279.
[14]	陈沅江,尹进,胡毅夫. 软岩边坡锚索预应力定量损失规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(8): 1685-1691. CHEN Yuanjiang, YIN Jin, HU Yifu. Research on prestress quantitative loss law of soft rock slope anchor cable[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(8): 1685-1691.
[15]	韩光,朱训国,王大国. 锚索预应力损失的影响因素分析及其补偿措施[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2008,27(2):176-179. HAN Guang, ZHU Xunguo, WANG Daguo. Analysis of factors affecting pre-stressing loss in pre-stressing cable anchor and compensative measures[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2008, 27(2): 176-179.
[16]	陈安敏,顾金才,沈俊,等. 软岩加固中锚索张拉吨位随时间变化规律的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(2):251-256.
[17]	ZHU Hanya, SHANG Yuequan, LU Ximing, et al. Coupling analysis of long-term prestress loss and slope creep[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(4): 464-467.
[18]	王清标,张聪,王辉,等. 预应力锚索锚固力损失与岩土体蠕变耦合效应研究[J].岩土力学,2014,35(8):2150-2156. WANG Qingbiao, ZHANG Cong, WANG Hui, et al. Study of coupling effect between anchorage force loss of prestressed anchor cable and rock and soil creep[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(8): 2150-2156.
[19]	王克忠,吴慧,赵宇飞. 深部地下厂房锚索预应力损失与岩体蠕变耦合分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(6): 1481-1488. WANG Kezhong, WU Hui, ZHAO Yufei. Coupling between reduction of force in prestressed anchor cable and rock creep in deep-buried underground powerhouse[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(6): 1481-1488.
[20]	WANG G, LIU C Z, JIANG Y J, et al. Rheological model of DMFC rockbolt and rockmass in a circular tunnel[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(6): 2319-2357.
[21]	BRANTUT N, HEAP M J, MEREDITH P G, et al. Time-dependent cracking and brittle creep in crustal rocks: a review[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2013, 52: 17-43.
[22]	BÉREST P, ANTOINE BLUM P, PIERRE CHARPENTIER J, et al. Very slow creep tests on rock samples[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2005, 42(4): 569-576.
[23]	LOMNITZ C.Creep measurements in igneous rocks with some applications to aftershock theory[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1956, 64(5): 473-479.
[24]	YANG W D, ZHANG Q Y, LI S C, et al. Time-dependent behavior of diabase and a nonlinear creep model[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(4): 1211-1224.
[25]	SLIZOWSKI J, LANKOF L. Salt-mudstones and rock-salt suitabilities for radioactive-waste storage systems: rheological properties[J]. Applied Energy, 2003, 75(1): 137-144.
[26]	YANG C H, DAEMEN J J K, YIN J H. Experimental investigation of creep behavior of salt rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1999, 36(2): 233-242.
[27]	陈拓,陈国庆,黄润秋,等. 考虑高边坡强卸荷的锚索锚固力耦合变化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(11): 4125-4132. CHEN Tuo, CHEN Guoqing, HUANG Runqiu, et al. A model of anchorage force loss of anchor cable during high slope strong unloading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(11): 4125-4132.