Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (2): 17-31    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.02.02
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
山区公路隧道工作面坍塌事故风险定量分析研究
田涛1,2,仝跃1,3,李泽豫4,徐捷4*,周鸣亮4,金文滔1,5,黄宏伟4
1. 云南宣会高速公路有限公司, 云南 曲靖 654299;2. 云南云岭高速公路工程咨询有限公司, 云南 昆明 650213;3. 云南交投集团投资有限公司, 云南 昆明 650228;4. 同济大学土木工程学院地下建筑与工程系, 上海 200092;5. 云南云岭高原养护工程有限公司, 云南 昆明 650051
Research on quantitative analysis of tunnel face collapse risk in mountain highway tunnel
TIAN Tao1,2, TONG Yue1,3, LI Zeyu4, XU Jie4*, ZHOU Mingliang4, JIN Wentao1,5, HUANG Hongwei4
1. Yunnan Xuanhui Expressway Co., Ltd., Qujing 654299, Yunnan, China;
2. Yunnan Yunling Expressway Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Kunming 650213, Yunnan, China;
3. Investment Co., Ltd., of Yunan Communications Investment &
Construction Group Co., Ltd., Kunming 650228, Yunnan, China;
4. Department of Geotechnical Engineering College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
5. Yunnan Yunling Plateau Maintenance Engineering Co., Ltd., Kunming 650051, Yunnan, China
下载:  PDF (7717KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对当前隧道工程工作面坍塌风险这一特定事故的风险损失量化不足的现状,以钻爆法施工的云南山区公路隧道为对象,开展工作面坍塌事故风险损失的量化分析研究。通过构建融合发生概率与损失后果的风险量化框架,建立涵盖人员伤亡、工期延误及经济损失的量化计算模型,并基于ALARP原则制定相应的风险接受准则。研究聚焦于排险、出渣、立钢拱架、施作锚杆与喷射混凝土5个高风险工序,结合现场调研数据和各工序阶段坍塌风险的超越概率与损失规模,绘制人员伤亡F-N曲线工期延误的F-TD曲线经济损失的F-D曲线展开量化分析。结果表明,人员伤亡风险受作业人员时空分布影响显著,立钢拱架阶段风险最高;工期延误在小规模坍塌中主要由人员伤亡及后续整改主导,大规模坍塌则受清理与修复工作量控制;经济损失严重依赖人员抚恤支出与工期延误导致的间接成本,在我国西南地区,其占比常超过70%,致使中小规模坍塌已触及不可接受风险阈值。本研究可以为山区隧道施工安全的风险评估与管控提供一定的定量化依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
田涛
仝跃
李泽豫
徐捷
周鸣亮
金文滔
黄宏伟
关键词:  隧道工作面坍塌  风险损失量化  人员伤亡损失  工期延误损失  经济损失    
Abstract: Addressing the current lack of risk loss quantification for specific tunnel collapse incidents at tunnel faces, a quantitative analysis of risk losses associated with tunnel face collapses in mountainous highway tunnels in Yunnan constructed using the drill-and-blast method was conducted. By establishing a risk quantification framework integrating occurrence probability and loss consequences, a quantitative calculation model covering personnel casualties, project delays, and economic losses was developed. Corresponding risk acceptance criteria were formulated based on the ALARP principle.The study focused on five high-risk processes: hazard clearance, mucking, steel arch installation, anchor rod placement and shotcrete application. Combining field survey data with the exceedance probability and loss magnitude of collapse risks at each process stage, quantitative analysis was performed using F-N curves for casualties, F-TD curves for schedule delays, and F-D curves for economic losses. Results indicated that personnel injury risk was significantly influenced by workers' spatiotemporal distribution, peaking during steel arch installation. Schedule delays in minor collapses were primarily driven by casualties and subsequent rectification, while major collapses were controlled by cleanup and repair workloads.Economic losses heavily depended on personnel compensation and indirect costs from schedule delays, often exceeding 70% of total losses in Southwest China, suggesting that even small-to-medium collapses may reach unacceptable risk thresholds.This study provides quantitative insights for risk assessment and management in mountain tunnel construction safety.
Key words:  tunnel face collapse    quantification of risk losses    personnel casualty losses    project delay losses    economic lossesReceived: 2026-02-12    Revised: 2026-05-15    Accepted: 2026-05-18    Published: 2026-06-20
发布日期:  2026-07-07     
中图分类号:  U45  
  TU457  
基金资助: 云南省基础研究计划资助项目(202301AU070098);云南省交通运输厅科技资助项目(云交科教便〔2023〕146号)
作者简介:  田涛(1993— ),男,云南曲靖人,高级工程师,主要研究方向为高速公路工程管理、科技创新及项目生态环境保护. E-mail:908003809@qq.com. *通信作者简介:徐捷(2002— ),男,江苏南通人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为隧道工作面稳定性研究. E-mail:2530921@tongji.edu.cn
引用本文:    
田涛,仝跃,李泽豫,徐捷,周鸣亮,金文滔,黄宏伟. 山区公路隧道工作面坍塌事故风险定量分析研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 17-31.
TIAN Tao, TONG Yue, LI Zeyu, XU Jie, ZHOU Mingliang, JIN Wentao, HUANG Hongwei. Research on quantitative analysis of tunnel face collapse risk in mountain highway tunnel. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(2): 17-31.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I2/17
[1] SALAZAR LEDEZMA G F. Stochastic and economic evaluation of adaptability in tunneling design and construction[D]. Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1983: 318-319.
[2] EINSTEIN H H, CHIAVERIO F, KOEPEL U. Risk analysis for the adler tunnel [J]. Tunnels & Tunnelling International, 1994, 26(11): 28-30.
[3] STURK R, OLSSON L, JOHANSSON J. Risk and decision analysis for large underground projects, as applied to the Stockholm Ring Road Tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(2): 157-164.
[4] LAUGHTON C. Evaluation and prediction of tunnel boring machine performance in variable rock masses[D].Austin,USA:University of Texas at Austin, 1998:1.
[5] ISAKSSON T. Tunnelling in poor ground-choice of shield method based on reliability [C] //Proceedings of the 11th Danube-European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Boca Raton,USA: CRC Press,1998: 527-534.
[6] SNEL A J M, VAN HASSELT D R S. Risk management in the Amsterdam north/south metro line:a matter of process-communication instead of calculation[C] //Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 99.Oslo, Norway:[s.n.] ,1999:179-181.
[7] SUN H Y, ZHU M Q, DAI Y M, et al. Dynamic risk early warning system for tunnel construction based on two-dimensional cloud model[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 255: 124799.
[8] KOLIC D. Risk analysis for design and construction aspects of Mala Kapela tunnel[C] //Proceedings of the ITA World Tunneling Congress: Reclaiming the Underground Space. Lisse, the Netherlands: A.A. Balkema, 2003: 513-519.
[9] LI L P, FAN H Y, LIU H L, et al. Analysis of factors influencing tunnel block collapse in blocky rock masses: insights from large-scale model experiments and DDA simulations[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2024, 57(11): 9847-9864.
[10] MCFEAT-SMITH I, HARMAN K W. IMS risk evaluation system for financing and insuring tunnel projects[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19(4/5): 334.
[11] 黄宏伟, 陈桂香. 风险管理在降低地铁造价中的作用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(5): 1-6. HUANG Hongwei, CHEN Guixiang. Role of risk management in the cost reduction of metro construction[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2003, 40(5): 1-6.
[12] 陈龙, 黄宏伟. 岩石隧道工程风险浅析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(1): 110-115. CHEN Long, HUANG Hongwei. Risk analysis of rock tunnel engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(1): 110-115.
[13] 闫玉茹, 黄宏伟, 胡群芳, 等. 大连湾海底隧道钻爆法施工风险评估研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(增刊2): 3616-3624. YAN Yuru, HUANG Hongwei, HU Qunfang, et al. Risk assessment on drill and blasting method of Dalian Bay Subsea Tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(Suppl.2): 3616-3624.
[14] 王燕, 黄宏伟, 薛亚东. 钻爆法施工隧道塌方风险分析[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 25(1): 23-27. WANG Yan, HUANG Hongwei, XUE Yadong. Risk analysis of collapse for tunnels constructed by drill and blast method[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University(Natural Science), 2009, 25(1): 23-27.
[15] 杨立, 夏增选, 娄文杰, 等. 山区深埋公路隧道穿越断层破碎带施工稳定性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3):32-42. YANG Li, XIA Zengxuan, LOU Wenjie, et al. Construction stability of deeply buried highway tunnel through fault fracture zones in mountainous areas[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(3): 32-42.
[16] 仝跃, 朱子越, 陈俊武, 等. 无中导连拱隧道施工力学性态分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 43-58. TONG Yue, ZHU Ziyue, CHEN Junwu, et al. Mechanical behavior analysis of the construction process of a multi-arch tunnel without middle drift[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(1): 43-58.
[17] 周宗青, 李术才, 李利平, 等. 岩溶隧道突涌水危险性评价的属性识别模型及其工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(3): 818-826. ZHOU Zongqing, LI Shucai, LI Liping, et al. Attribute recognition model of fatalness assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels and its application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(3): 818-826.
[18] 张永刚, 王永红, 王梦恕. 渤海湾海底隧道工程施工风险评估与控制分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(增刊1): 414-418. ZHANG Yonggang, WANG Yonghong, WANG Mengshu. Risk assessment of construction for Bohai Bay Subsea Tunnel[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(Suppl.1): 414-418.
[19] MA T S, LIU K Y, QIU Y, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of wellbore collapse of inclined wells in formations with anisotropic rock strengths[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2025, 58(2): 1795-1818.
[20] ZHANG S L, GAO J L, LIU C, et al. Model test on the collapse mechanism of subway tunnels in the soil-sand-rock composite strata[J].Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024,162: 108356.
[21] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 等. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60. LI Qidi, LIANG Qingguo, ZHOU Ren, et al. Analysis of initial ground stress field and prediction of rockurst in Ganqing Tunnel[J].Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[22] 杨云. 穿越断层破碎带铁路隧道施工安全多重风险管理研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2022: 72-76. YANG Yun. Study on multiple risk management for railway tunnel construction safety through fault fracture zones[D].Changsha:Central South University, 2022: 72-76.
[23] FARMER F R. Siting criteria: a new approach[C] //Proceedings of the IAEA Symposium on Nuclear Siting. Vienna, Austria: IAEA, 1967: 303-329.
[24] FELL R. Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1994, 31(2): 261-272.
[25] DAI F C, LEE C F, NGAI Y Y. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview[J]. Engineering Geology, 2002, 64(1): 65-87.
[26] 胡群芳, 黄宏伟. 隧道及地下工程风险接受准则计算模型研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2006, 2(1): 60-64. HU Qunfang, HUANG Hongwei. Study on the modeling of risk acceptance criteria for tunnel and underground engineering[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(1): 60-64.
[27] 周杨. 长大隧道工程建设期风险接受准则研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2007: 80-82. ZHOU Yang. Risk acceptance criteria of long large tunnels in construction period[D]. Shanghai:Tongji University, 2007:80-82.
[28] ABRAHAMSEN E B, ROED W, JONGEJAN R. A practical approach for the evaluation of acceptable risk in road tunnels[J].Journal of Risk Research, 2013, 16(5): 625-633.
[29] 赵峰, 夏永旭, 常海兵. 中国公路隧道运营风险接受准则研究[J]. 中外公路, 2014, 34(6): 191-197. ZHAO Feng, XIA Yongxu, CHANG Haibing.Study on risk acceptance criteria of highway tunnel operation in China[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2014, 34(6): 191-197.
[30] 李燕庭. 铁路建设工程风险分级标准研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2014: 44-51. LI Yanting. Research on risk classification criteria of railway construction projects[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong Universtity, 2014: 44-51.
[31] 仝跃, 黄宏伟, 张东明, 等. 高放废物处置地下实验室建设期风险接受准则[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(2): 151-156. TONG Yue, HUANG Hongwei, ZHANG Dongming, et al. Research on risk acceptance criteria for construction of HLW geological disposal URL[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(2): 151-156.
[32] 仝跃, 岳瑶, 黄宏伟, 等. 钻爆法施工隧道塌方风险量化评估模型及其应用[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2022, 44(5): 46-56. TONG Yue, YUE Yao, HUANG Hongwei, et al. Establishment and application of a quantitative assessment model of collapse risk in tunnel excavated by drilling and blasting method[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2022, 44(5): 46-56.
[33] LI Z Q, WANG S, CAO Y P, et al. Dynamic risk evaluation method of collapse in the whole construction of shallow buried tunnels and engineering application[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(4): 4300-4319.
[34] KNIGHT F H. Risk, uncertainty and profit [M]. New Edition. Wilmington, USA:Vernon Press, 2013:197-198.
[35] 李泽豫, 周鸣亮, 黄宏伟, 等. 考虑胶结作用的断层泥力学特性与本构表征[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2024, 32(6): 1801-1819. LI Zeyu, ZHOU Mingliang, HUANG Hongwei, et al. Study on the mechanical behavior of fault gouge with cementation: characterization and constitutive modeling[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2024, 32(6): 1801-1819.
[36] LI Z H, HUANG H W, XUE Y D. Cut-slope versus shallow tunnel: risk-based decision making framework for alternative selection[J]. Engineering Geology, 2014, 176: 11-23.
[37] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路隧道施工技术规范:JTG/T 3660—2020[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2020: 12-13.
[38] 李典庆, 唐文勇, 张圣坤. 海洋工程风险接受准则研究进展[J]. 海洋工程, 2003, 21(2): 96-102. LI Dianqing, TANG Wenyong, ZHANG Shengkun. Review of risk acceptance criteria for ocean engineering[J]. The Ocean Engineering, 2003, 21(2): 96-102.
[39] JONES D A. Nomenclature for hazard and risk assessment in the process industries[M]. 2nd ed. Rugby, UK: Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1994:46-47.
[40] VRIJLING J K, VAN GELDER P H A J M. Societal risk and the concept of risk aversion[M] //Advances in Safety and Reliability. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997: 45-52.
[41] JONKMAN S N, VAN GELDER P H A J M, VRIJLING J K. An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 99(1): 1-30.
[42] 毛建平, 张望彬. 基于模糊综合评判法的工期风险分析[J]. 施工技术, 2009, 38(增刊2): 358-359. MAO Jianping, ZHANG Wangbin. Risk analysis of construction period based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Construction Technology, 2009, 38(Suppl.2): 358-359.
[1] 魏健, 常伟学, 梁庆国, 祁亮斌, 李奇伟. 断层破碎带隧道围岩变形及支护受力特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-14.
[2] 陈彰昕, 王刚, 李文锋, 李科, 江松, 刘廷方. 基于改进DeepLabV3+和渗流算法的隧道裂缝检测研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-14.
[3] 陈志敏, 师浩博, 张润龙, 黎俊鸿, 路帅, 谈成龙. 基于裂缝形状与特征的衬砌结构开裂截面稳定性评估研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-10.
[4] 钟浩, 张永平, 蔡先庆, 袁松, 孔庆轩, 孙浩, 郭胜. 基于多尺度地质特征增强与深度卷积网络的隧道掌子面围岩等级智能评估[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-13.
[5] 王浩赟, 张万志, 张恒, 孙岩峰, 袁铭占. 拱盖法隧道拱脚爆破围岩破坏特征与参数优化[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-13.
[6] 王立川,贺维国,张俊儒,武宏斌,蒋新强,章慧健,王文,黄林祥. 软弱破碎地层地铁车站钢管桩柱拱盖法施工力学特性及其应用[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 1-12.
[7] 邓稀肥,申志军,汪涛,江胜华,杨杰,李宏波. 基于直流电阻率法的旋喷桩加固正问题模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 13-20.
[8] 雷文君,郭丽丽,赵旭明,邰传民,齐悦. 补风方式对地铁隧道火灾烟气控制效果的研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 31-41.
[9] 李炼然,任周洪,王斌,张权,黄灏,刘吉金,许浩宇,郭谦. 等值反磁通瞬变电磁数据的波场反变换方法及其在会泽铅锌矿区井下超前探测中的应用[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 51-63.
[10] 王少锋,曹翔鹏. 聚氨酯基体与细骨料组成的隧道隔震材料的力学性能试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 64-72.
[11] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[12] 钟浩,蔡先庆,孙浩,孔庆轩,张永平. 温度影响下砂岩三轴压缩行为:加荷特性、剪切变形及预测软件研发[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 81-95.
[13] 王立川, 贺维国, 张俊儒, 武宏斌, 蒋新强, 章慧健, 王文, 黄林祥. 软弱破碎地层地铁车站钢管桩柱拱盖法施工力学特性及其应用[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-14.
[14] 高贤成. 基于ConDenseNet架构煤岩破坏识别模型及其优化研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-13.
[15] 钟建敏, 张亮亮, 何应道, 罗驰恒, 熊逸凡, 王超. 济泺路穿黄北延隧道设计关键技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 0, (): 1-11.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn