Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于PIV技术的浅埋暗挖施工扰动诱发地表塌陷模型试验研究
黄阜,申勇斌,张敏,王勇涛,杨云强,朱睿
(长沙理工大学土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114)
Model test study on surface collapse induced by underground excavation disturbance based on PIV technique
HUANG Fu, SHEN Yongbin, ZHANG Min, WANG Yongtao, YANG Yunqiang, ZHU Rui
(School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, Hunan, China)
下载:  PDF (7833KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目前,浅埋暗挖施工诱发地表塌陷的发生机理和极限状态下的破坏模式尚不清楚。针对这一研究现状,利用基于粒子图像测速技术(particle image velocimetry,PIV)的缩尺模型试验,模拟砂土和V级围岩中浅埋隧道的暗挖施工过程并利用PIV技术对暗挖隧道施工过程中围岩变形的图片进行分析,获得了暗挖施工扰动诱发地层变形的位移云图。通过分析暗挖施工扰动诱发地表变形特征和渐进演变规律,总结了极限状态下不同地层中暗挖隧道施工诱发地表塌陷的破坏面形状和塌陷范围。在此基础上,利用极限分析上限定理和变分原理推导得到暗挖施工诱发拱顶地层塌陷的破坏面方程并绘制出塌落面图形。通过将模型试验得到的暗挖施工诱发拱顶地层塌陷的范围与理论计算结果进行对比,验证了本研究模型试验结果的有效性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄阜
申勇斌
张敏
王勇涛
杨云强
朱睿
关键词:  浅埋暗挖  模型试验  PIV技术  地表塌陷  对比验证    
Abstract: Presently, the occurrence mechanism of the surface collapse induced by underground excavation was not clear. In view of this situation, the surface collapse induced by underground excavation in sand and surrounding rock of grade V was studied by model test based on the PIV technique. The displacement nephograms of the surface collapse induced by underground excavation were obtained and the progressive evolution rule of the surface collapse was summarized. Moreover, the collapse surface was calculated by the limit analysis of upper bound theorem and variational method. By comparing the collapse surface provided by theoretical calculation with that obtained from model test, the validity of the collapse mode presented by model test paper was proved.
Key words:  underground excavation    model test    PIV Technique    surface collapse    comparison validation
收稿日期:  2024-04-24      修回日期:  2022-07-19      发布日期:  2024-07-22     
中图分类号:  TU94+1  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(52278395)
作者简介:  黄阜(1983—),男,湖南岳阳人,特聘教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道与城市地下工程。E-mail:hfcsust@csust.edu.cn
引用本文:    
黄阜, 申勇斌, 张敏, 王勇涛, 杨云强, 朱睿. 基于PIV技术的浅埋暗挖施工扰动诱发地表塌陷模型试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
HUANG Fu, SHEN Yongbin, ZHANG Min, WANG Yongtao, YANG Yunqiang, ZHU Rui. Model test study on surface collapse induced by underground excavation disturbance based on PIV technique. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-10.
链接本文:  
[1] 高搏, 龙建平, 吴恺, 骆建军. 海相地层浅埋暗挖隧道水平旋喷桩超前支护地层变形规律分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 64-73.
[2] 周旭明, 石钰锋, 张利敏, 张慧鹏, 曹成威, 陈昭阳. 边墙与仰拱连接处缺陷对隧道结构影响试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 74-80.
[3] 张治国, 程志翔, 陈杰, 吴钟腾, 李云正. 盾构隧道接缝渗漏水诱发既有管线变形模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 77-91.
[4] 吕玺琳, 赵庾成, 曾盛. 砂层中盾构隧道开挖面稳定性物理模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 67-76.
[5] 陈峰军, 宗军良, 王祺, 禹海涛. 地面出入式超浅埋盾构隧道静力响应模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 66-72.
[6] 周勇, 李召峰, 左志武, 王川, 王钰鑫, 林春金, 张新, 张乾青, 姚望, 王凯. 桩侧注浆提升粉质黏土地层既有桩基承载力试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 38-47.
[7] 张姣龙, 高一民, 张建, 周浩, 潘野, 柯磊, 柳献. 一种模拟盾构刀盘破岩过程的模型试验设计原理和方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 20-28.
[8] 李荣建, 李浩泽, 白维仕, 王磊, 张瑾. 潜在滑动面对隧道衬砌承载特性影响的模型试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 1-8.
[9] 张治国, 张洋彬, 王志伟, 方蕾, 马少坤, 师敏之, 魏纲. 类矩形截面隧道开挖诱发邻近管线变形模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(4): 85-96.
[10] 李兆平, 史磊磊. 北京地区暗挖地铁车站结构设计方法研究进展综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 14-21.
[11] 谭忠盛. 隧道与地下工程建设理念及关键技术——记王梦恕院士的主要学术思想和科研成就[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(2): 1-6.
[1] ZHOU Caigui, LI Jing, LIANG Qingguo, CHEN Kelin. Comparison of water inflow prediction methods of hydraulic diversion tunnels during construction[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 32 -44 .
[2] HUANG Zheng, YE Zhangqian, ZHANG Jiawei, PENG Zimao, YAN Zhanshuo. The influence of intumescent fire retardant coating on the fire resistance of assembled frame tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -16 .
[3] ZHANG Ning, HUANG Xinjie, WANG Chuan, XU Bin, ZHANG Jiancheng, ZHANG Bo. Experimental and numerical simulation of high-pressure water jet cutting concrete[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 47 -56 .
[4] JIA Rui, YANG Gang, ZHENG Gang. Influence of shield tunnel construction history on seismic response of tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 41 -51 .
[5] WANG Qiuzhe, HAN Rui, BAI Xiaoxiao, ZHAO Kai. Seismic stability of immersed tunnel under locked backfill[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 71 -77 .
[6] . [J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2): 128 -130 .
[7] HAO Junsuo, LIU Junfeng, LIU Hao, ZHAO Mingfan. Inducement and prevention technology of secondary disasters of water and mud inrush in tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 81 -92 .
[8] . [J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2): 124 -127 .
[9] FU Changbo, HONG Chenghua, WANG Zhechao, WANG Pengyu, LI Wei. Stability evaluation and faults influence analysis of water-sealed caverns during construction[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -11 .
[10] QIAN Qihu. Scientific use of the urban underground space to construction the harmonious livable and beautiful city[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 1 -7 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn