Model test on deformation of existing pipeline induced by joint leakage of shield tunnels
ZHANG Zhiguo1,2,3,4,5, CHENG Zhixiang1, CHEN Jie1, WU Zhongteng2,3, LI Yunzheng1
1. School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention of Hilly Mountains, Ministry of Natural Resources, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, China; 3. Fujian Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, China; 4. North Sea Marine Forecast Center of State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China; 5. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Environment and Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China
Abstract: Based on the critical leakage width, a model test system of adjacent pipelines deformation induced by the joint leakage of shield tunnel was established, including the shield tunnel and pipeline model, simulation device of shield tunnel joint leakage, water level control system, and data acquisition system, the influences of the position, distribution and depth of the leakage on the deformation and settlement of the pipeline, the internal force of the pipeline and the pore water pressure of the soil around the leakage were studied. The results showed that with the increasing of the depth of the overburden soil, the vertical distance between the leak and the pipeline increased, and the water-rich sand layer would produce more soil and water pressure on the upper part of the support, and the settlement deformation and internal force of the pipeline would decrease under the condition of the same depth of overburden soil, the peak value of settlement and internal force of the pipeline decreased gradually as the position of the leakage seam deviated to the bottom of the arch, the corresponding position gradually moved away from the central axis of the tunnel, and the settlement deformation of the pipeline above the leakage seam side was obvious, the settlement deformation and internal force increase with the increased of the number of the single side leakage, the location of the new leakage was close to the arch crown under the condition of bilateral asymmetric leakage, the settlement deformation and internal force of the pipeline were obviously asymmetric with respect to the central axis of the tunnel. The monitoring value of pore water pressure could reasonably explain the distribution of seepage field around the leakage of shield tunnel. The closer to the leakage location was, the smaller the monitoring value of pore water pressure and the larger the dissipation value of pore water pressure was, water always flowed from a high to a low pore pressure position.
张治国, 程志翔, 陈杰, 吴钟腾, 李云正. 盾构隧道接缝渗漏水诱发既有管线变形模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 77-91.
ZHANG Zhiguo, CHENG Zhixiang, CHEN Jie, WU Zhongteng, LI Yunzheng. Model test on deformation of existing pipeline induced by joint leakage of shield tunnels. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 77-91.
[1] LAVER R G. Long-term behaviour of twin tunnels in London clay[D]. London, U K: Cambridge University, 2011. [2] 马龙祥,张冬梅.软土盾构隧道稳定渗流分析[J]. 地下工程与空间学报, 2013, 9(1): 37-41. MA Longxiang, ZHANG Dongmei. Analytical prediction of water leakage into shield driven tunnel in saturated clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2013, 9(1): 37-41. [3] 朱成伟,应宏伟,龚晓南. 任意埋深水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991. ZHU Chengwei, YING Hongwei, GONG Xiaonan. Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991. [4] 张丙强,王启云,卢晓颖. 软土地层浅埋圆形隧道非达西渗流场解析研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2018, 39(12): 4377-4384. ZHANG Bingqiang, WANG Qiyun, LU Xiaoying. Analytical solution for non-Darcian seepage field of a shallow circular tunnel in soft soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4377-4384. [5] 贺志军,莫海强,邹金锋,等. 水下椭圆形隧道稳定渗流的近似解[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2019, 16(9): 2265-2271. HE Zhijun, MO Haiqiang, ZOU Jinfeng, et al. Approximate analytical solutions for steady seepage into an underwater elliptical tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2019, 16(9): 2265-2271. [6] 李林毅,阳军生,高超,等.考虑注浆圈作用的体外排水隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(1): 133-141. LI Linyi, YANG Junsheng, GAO Chao, et al. Analytical study on seepage field of tunnels with external drainage considering effect of grouting rings[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1): 133-141. [7] WU H N, SHEN S L, CHEN R P, et al. Three-dimensional numerical modelling on localised leakage in segmental lining of shield tunnels[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 112(6): 103549. [8] 叶治,付岸然,刘华北. 盾构隧道拱顶渗流侵蚀对地表沉降及结构变形的影响[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(3): 279-287. YE Zhi, FU Anran, LIU Huabei. Effect of seepage erosion of tunnel crown on ground settlement and structural deformation in shield tunnelling[J]. Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences), 2021, 49(3): 279-287. [9] LONG Y Y, LI G, TAN Y. Soil arching due to leaking of tunnel buried in water-rich sand[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95(1): 103158. [10] 张冬梅,高程鹏,尹振宇,等. 隧道渗流侵蚀的颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(增刊1): 429-438. ZHANG Dongmei, GAO Chengpeng, YIN Zhenyu, et al. Particle flow simulation of seepage erosion around shield tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanic, 2017, 38(Suppl.1): 429-438. [11] WANG Z, LI G, WANG A, et al. Numerical simulation study of stratum subsidence induced by sand leakage in tunnel lining based on particle flow software[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2020, 38(4): 3955-3965. [12] 刘强,谭忠盛,王秀英. 水下隧道渗流场分布规律的模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(增刊1): 388-392. LIU Qiang, TAN Zhongsheng, WANG Xiuying. Model test study on the distribution law of underwater tunnel seepage field[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(Suppl.1): 388-392. [13] 郑刚,戴轩,张晓双. 地下工程漏水漏砂灾害发展过程的试验研究及数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(12): 2458-2471. ZHENG Gang, DAI Xuan, ZHENG Xiaoshuang. Experimental study and numerical simulation of leaking process of sand and water in underground engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(12): 2458-2471. [14] 何勇兴. 地下管道漏损对周围土体侵蚀影响研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017. HE Yongxing. Study on the soil erosion around underground pipe leakage[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2017. [15] 刘成禹,陈博文,罗洪林,等. 满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 1-10. LIU Chengyu, CHEN Bowen, LUO Honglin, et al. Experimental study of seepage erosion induced by pipeline damage under full pipe flow condition[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 1-10. [16] 刘成禹,陈博文,林炜,等. 地下管道破损诱发沉降的预测模型及试验验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(3): 416-424. LIU Chengyu, CHEN Bowen, LIN Wei, et al. Prediction model for settlement caused by damage of underground pipelines and its experimental verification[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(3): 416-424. [17] 王翱翔. 砂土地层隧道衬砌漏砂(水)诱发地层塌陷的机理研究[D]. 大连: 大连交通大学, 2020. WANG Aoxiang. The mechanism study of strata subsidence induced by sand(water)leakage of tunnel lining in sandy stratum[D]. Dalian: Dalian Jiaotong University, 2020. [18] 路平,陈灿,廖陈畅,等. 水下盾构隧道接缝渗漏规律的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(5): 234-240. LU Ping, CHEN Can, LIAO Chenchang, et al. Model test on joint leakage in underwater shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(5): 234-240. [19] WANG Z, LI G. Experimental study on stratigraphic subsidence induced by sand leakage in tunnel lining cracks[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 24(8): 2345-2352. [20] 张成平,岳跃敬,蔡义. 管线渗漏水范围对浅埋隧道围岩变形和破坏的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(2): 392-400. ZAHNG Chengping, YUE Yuejing, CAI Yi. Influence of pipeline leakage range on ground deformation and failure during shallow tunnelling[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(2): 392-400. [21] 汪维东,黄晓康,朱大勇,等. 管线渗漏对地铁盾构影响的模型试验研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 44(5): 666-671. WANG Weidong, HUANG Xiaokang, ZHU Dayong, et al. Model test of the effect of pipeline leakage on metro shield construction[J]. Journal of Hefei university of technology(Natural Sciences), 2021, 44(5): 666-671.
2022, Vol. 4 
