Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2022, Vol. 4 Issue (4): 52-58    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2022.04.07
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
盾构隧道防水密封垫材料的高温老化后性能
喻伟1,林赞权2,朱彬彬2,汪元冶2,丁文其3,乔亚飞3,张晓东1,龚琛杰2*
1. 中铁南方投资集团有限公司, 广东 深圳 518054;2. 中南大学土木工程学院, 湖南 长沙 410075;3. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系, 上海 200092
High-temperature aged performance of waterproof gasket used in shield tunnel
YU Wei1, LIN Zanquan2, ZHU Binbin2, WANG Yuanye2, DING Wenqi3, QIAO Yafei3, ZHANG Xiaodong1, GONG Chenjie2*
1. China Railway Southern Investment Group Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518054, Guangdong, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, Hunan, China;
3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
下载:  PDF (5692KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为了应对突发火灾,减少火灾带来的损失,有必要探明高温下密封垫的性能变化趋势以及高温后密封垫的力学性能和密封性能。对接缝防水密封垫材料及断面构型的选用现状调研分析;考虑高温作用对现有密封垫材料性能的影响,设计开展多工况的材料热氧老化试验。研究发现:工程界倾向于采用三元乙丙(EPDM)材质的谢斯菲尔德型密封垫,孔型多为圆形双排孔;在不同温度工况下老化后,中、低硬度(40 HA、60 HA)的EPDM材料材性整体呈下降趋势,而高硬度(80 HA)的EPDM材料存在拉伸强度先提升后下降的规律;高温老化后的EPDM材料会产生较大的材性损失,会在材料层面影响管片接缝密封垫的密封性能,降低接缝长期防水可靠性。研究成果对于科学评价盾构隧道接缝密封垫服役性能演化规律具有指导意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
喻伟
林赞权
朱彬彬
汪元冶
丁文其
乔亚飞
张晓东
龚琛杰
关键词:  盾构隧道  防水密封垫  材料特性  高温老化  性能演化    
Abstract: In order to cope with the risk of sudden fire and reduce the damage caused by the fire, it was necessary to investigate the performance change trend of the gasket under high temperature, and then the mechanical properties and sealing performance of the gasket after high temperature were verified. The material selection and hole type selection of sealing gasket were investigated. In view of the influence of high temperature on gasket material, the thermal oxidizing aging test of rubber specimen was carried out under high temperature condition and the material property loss was measured. The main research findings were as follows: it was found that the engineering industry tends to adopt “Shesfield type” sealing gasket made of EPDM ma-terial, and the hole type was mostly circular double row hole. After aging at different temperatures, the overall material property of medium or low hardness(40 HA, 60 HA)EPDM materials showed a downward trend, while the tensile strength of 80 HA EPDM material had a high hardness increases first and then decreases. Under high temperature conditions, EPDM would have a large material loss, which would affect the sealing performance of the sealing gasket at the segment joint at the material level, and reduced the long-term waterproof reliability of the joint. The research results have guiding significance for the scientific evaluation of the service performance evolution of shield tunnel joint gaskets.
Key words:  shield tunnel    waterproof gasket    material property    high temperature aging    performance evolution
收稿日期:  2021-11-12      修回日期:  2022-01-23      发布日期:  2022-12-20     
中图分类号:  U45  
  TU761.1+1  
基金资助: 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51908557)
通讯作者:  龚琛杰(1990— ),男,重庆璧山人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程.    E-mail:  gongcj@csu.edu.cn
作者简介:  喻伟(1986— ),男,湖北黄冈人,硕士,高级工程师,主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程. E-mail:527131224@qq.com.
引用本文:    
喻伟, 林赞权, 朱彬彬, 汪元冶, 丁文其, 乔亚飞, 张晓东, 龚琛杰. 盾构隧道防水密封垫材料的高温老化后性能[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 52-58.
YU Wei, LIN Zanquan, ZHU Binbin, WANG Yuanye, DING Wenqi, QIAO Yafei, ZHANG Xiaodong, GONG Chenjie. High-temperature aged performance of waterproof gasket used in shield tunnel. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(4): 52-58.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2022/V4/I4/52
[1] 龚琛杰, 丁文其. 大直径水下盾构隧道接缝弹性密封垫防水性能研究—设计方法与工程指导[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2018, 38(10): 1712-1722. GONG Chenjie, DING Wenqi. Waterproof prop erties of elastic sealing gaskets used in segmental joints of large-diameter underwater shield tunnels: design methodology and engineering guidance[J].Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(10):1712-1722.
[2] GONG Chenjie, DING Wenqi, MOSALAM K M. Performance-based design of joint waterproofing of segmental tunnel linings using hybrid computational/experimental procedures[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 96: 103172.
[3] 朱合华,彭芳乐,闫治国.国内外交通隧道火灾安全研究现状及启示[J].民防苑,2006(增刊1):135-139.
[4] 韩新,崔力明. 国内外隧道火灾试验研究进展简述[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2008, 4(3): 544-549. HAN Xin, CUI Liming. Brief introduction to tunnel fire test research at home and abroad[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2008, 4(3): 544-549.
[5] 张高乐,张稳军,喻国伦,等. 火灾高温下盾构隧道衬砌结构热力耦合模型试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(7): 120-128. ZHANG Gaole, ZHANG Wenjun, YU Guolun, et al. Model test on thermomechanical coupling of shield tunnel lining under high fire temperature[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(7): 120-128.
[6] 刘腾. 盾构隧道火灾对管片衬砌的损伤预测和安全性评价研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2016. LIU Teng. Damage prediction and safety evalu ation of segment lining in shield tunnel fire[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016.
[7] 沈佳佳. 地铁盾构隧道管片接头抗渗与耐久性能演化研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2014. SHEN Jiajia. Research on impermeability and durability evolution of segment joint of shield tunnel[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2014.
[8] 丁文其, 赵伟, 彭益成, 等. 盾构隧道防水密封垫长期防水性能预测方法研究[C] //水下隧道建设与管理技术论文集. 北京:《中国公路》杂志社,2013. DING Wenqi, ZHAO Wei, PENG Yicheng, et al. Study on long-term waterproof performance prediction method of shield tunnel waterproof gasket[C] //Technical Papers on Construction and Management of Underwater Tunnels. Beijing: China Highway Magazine Society, 2013.
[9] GONG Chenjie, DING Wenqi, SOGA K, et al. Failure mechanism of joint waterproofing in precast segmental tunnel linings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 334-352.
[10] GONG Chenjie, DING Wenqi, SOGA K, et al. Sealant behavior of gasketed segmental joints in shield tunnels: an experimental and numerical study[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 77: 127-141.
[11] SHALABI F I, CORDING E J, PAUL S L. Concrete segment tunnel lining sealant performance under earthquake loading[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 31: 51-60.
[12] 龚琛杰. 盾构隧道管片接缝防水渐进失效机理与精细化模型研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2018. GONG Chenjie. Progressive Failure Mechanism and Detailed Model on the Waterproof Behavior of Tunnel Segmental Joints[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2018.
[13] WANG Zenian, SHEN Shuilong, ZHOU Annan, et al. Experimental investigation of water-swelling characteristics of polymer materials for tunnel sealing gasket[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 256: 119473.
[14] 朱祖熹. 城市隧道防水技术的现状与展望[J]. 地下工程与隧道, 1995(4):18-24.
[15] 崔永刚. 盾构隧道EPDM密封垫截面形式对防水性能的影响分析[J]. 中国建筑防水, 2020(12): 40-44. CUI Yonggang. Analysis on influence of the sec tion forms of EPDM sealing cushion of shield tunnel on waterproofing performance[J]. China Building Waterproofing, 2020(12): 40-44.
[16] 顾赟.青草沙输水隧道防水密封设计[J].中国建筑防水,2010(18):32-36. GU Yun. Waterproofing design for Qingcaosha Water Tunnel[J]. China Building Waterproofing, 2010(18):32-36.
[17] 陈云尧, 张军伟, 马士伟, 等. 盾构隧道管片接缝密封垫设计参数研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020, 57(4): 59-66. CHEN Yunyao, ZHANG Junwei, MA Shiwei, et al. Study on design parameters of sealing gasket for segment joints of shield tunnel[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2020, 57(4): 59-66.
[18] 吕帅. 不同压缩状态下密封垫的防水性能研究[J]. 中国建筑防水, 2016(2): 13-15. LYU Shuai. Study on waterproofing performance of sealing gasket under different compressive state[J]. China Building Waterproofing, 2016(2): 13-15.
[19] 广州合成材料研究院. 硫化橡胶或热塑性橡胶热空气加速老化和耐热试验: GB/T 3512—2001[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002.
[20] 中橡集团沈阳橡胶研究设计院.硫化橡胶或热塑性橡胶拉伸应力应变性能的测定: GB/T 528—2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[21] 合成材料研究院. 硫化橡胶压力空气热老化试验方法: GB/T 17782—1999[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1999.
[22] 沈奕.火灾高温条件下盾构隧道衬砌结构热力耦合行为研究[D].上海:同济大学,2015. SHEN Yi. Study on thermal-mechanical coupling behavior of shield tunnel lining structure under fire high temperature[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2015.
[1] 魏纲, 徐天宝, 张治国. 复杂应力路径下波纹钢加固盾构隧道数值分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 24-32.
[2] 王智, 刘祥勇, 朱先发, 洪小星, 沈一鸣, 张冰利. 小曲率半径隧道施工对盾构管片结构影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 45-54.
[3] 韩兴博, 陈子明, 苏恩杰, 梁晓明, 宋桂峰, 叶飞. 盾构隧道围岩压力分布规律及作用模式[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 34-43.
[4] 潘秋景, 李晓宙, 黄杉, 汪来, 王树英, 方国光. 机器学习在盾构隧道智能施工中的应用——综述与展望[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 10-30.
[5] 赵辰洋, 罗毛毛, 邱静怡, 倪芃芃, 赵锋烽. 盾构隧道施工引起地层变形预测方法综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 31-46.
[6] 张治国, 程志翔, 陈杰, 吴钟腾, 李云正. 盾构隧道接缝渗漏水诱发既有管线变形模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 77-91.
[7] 刘祥勇, 张鑫, 王军, 赵涛宁, 朱先发. 盾构施工对邻近建筑物群结构影响评价[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 99-106.
[8] 丁智, 李鑫家, 张霄. 基于机器学习的盾构掘进地表变形预测研究与展望[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 1-9.
[9] 吕玺琳, 赵庾成, 曾盛. 砂层中盾构隧道开挖面稳定性物理模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 67-76.
[10] 黄昕, 谷冠思, 张子新, 李昀. 考虑渗流的泥水平衡盾构隧道稳定性数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 28-38.
[11] 许有俊, 王智广, 张旭, 郭飞, 高胜雷, 杨昆. 小转弯半径盾构隧道施工引起的地层变形特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 11-18.
[12] 陈峰军, 宗军良, 王祺, 禹海涛. 地面出入式超浅埋盾构隧道静力响应模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 66-72.
[13] 马少俊, 李鑫家, 王乔坎, 丁智. 某深基坑开挖对邻近既有盾构隧道影响实测分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 86-94.
[14] 涂智溢,郭洪雨,孙飞,钟方杰,郑浩龙,张哲. 闹市区复杂环境下大直径盾构小净距下穿运营地铁隧道的应对措施及分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 75-84.
[15] 姜叶翔,周奇辉,羊逸君,苏凤阳,刘尊景,张霄,丁智. 采用管棚预支护方法的盾构穿越既有地铁隧道变形特征及加固影响实测分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(2): 49-60.
[1] QIAN Qihu. Scientific use of the urban underground space to construction the harmonious livable and beautiful city[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 1 -7 .
[2] DENG Mingjiang, LIU Bin. Challenges, countermeasures and development direction of geological forward-prospecting for TBM cluster tunneling in super-long tunnels[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 8 -19 .
[3] DING Xiuli, ZHANG Yuting, ZHANG Chuanjian, YAN Tianyou, HUANG Shuling. Review on countermeasures and their adaptability evaluation to tunnels crossing active faults[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 20 -35 .
[4] JIAO Yuyong, ZHANG Weishe, OU Guangzhao, ZOU Junpeng, CHEN Guanghui. Review of the evolution and mitigation of the water-inrush disaster in drilling-and-blasting excavated deep-buried tunnels[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 36 -46 .
[5] ZHANG Qingsong, ZHANG Lianzhen, LI Peng, FENG Xiao. New progress in grouting reinforcement theory of water-rich soft stratum in underground engineering[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 47 -57 .
[6] XIA Kaiwen, XU Ying, CHEN Rong. Dynamic tests of rocks subjected to simulated deep underground environments[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 58 -75 .
[7] HONG Kairong. Study on rock breaking and wear of TBM hob in high-strength high-abrasion stratum[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 76 -85 .
[8] TAN Zhongsheng. Application experimental study of high-strength lattice girders with heat treatment in tunnel engineering[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 86 -92 .
[9] CHEN Jianxun, LUO Yanbin. The stability of structure and its control technology for lager-span loess tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 93 -101 .
[10] JING Hongwen, YU Liyuan, SU Haijian, GU Jincai, YIN Qian. Development and application of catastrophic experiment system for water inrush in surrounding rock of deep tunnels[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 102 -110 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn