Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (3): 76-88    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.03.08
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
附加荷载下盾构隧道穿越软硬不均地层的变形及损伤演化规律
周朋1,2
1. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430063;2. 水下隧道技术国家地方联合工程研究中心, 湖北 武汉 430063
Deformation and damage evolution law of shield tunnels crossing soft-hard heterogeneous strata under additional loads
Zhou Peng1,2
1. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China;
2. National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Underwater Tunnelling Technology, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China
下载:  PDF (15060KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为揭示软硬不均地层条件下盾构隧道的纵向力学响应与损伤演化规律,以济南黄河济泺路隧道为工程背景,建立盾构隧道纵向三维精细化数值计算模型,基于衬砌整体损伤指标,研究河床淤积附加荷载作用下隧道的变形特征、损伤发展规律及破坏机制,并开展纵向残余顶推力和螺栓直径的参数敏感性分析。研究结果表明:软硬地层承载能力差异导致隧道在软硬交界面产生显著纵向不均匀变形,环缝呈现硬土侧张开、软土侧错台的特征,且变形随附加荷载增大而加剧;软硬交界面是结构变形与损伤最为敏感的区域,衬砌压缩损伤主要集中于交界面,拉伸损伤则主要分布于软土侧,管片环横向变形是诱发拉伸破坏的关键因素;纵向残余顶推力和螺栓直径均可提高隧道纵向刚度,但二者对结构响应的影响机制存在差异,其中纵向残余顶推力对变形控制和损伤演化的影响更为显著,有利于减小纵向变形和环缝错台,但会加剧局部压缩损伤及软土侧拉伸损伤,而增大螺栓直径则有助于抑制管片横向变形并降低拉伸损伤。研究表明,软硬交界面是盾构隧道结构安全控制的关键部位,纵向残余顶推力是影响结构受力状态与损伤发展的重要因素。研究成果可为软硬不均地层盾构隧道的设计、施工及运营安全评估提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
周朋
关键词:  盾构隧道  软硬不均地层  纵向力学性能  数值模拟  损伤评价    
Abstract: To reveal the longitudinal mechanical response and damage evolution law of shield tunnels in soft-hard heterogeneous strata, a refined three-dimensional longitudinal numerical model was established based on the engineering background of the Jinan Yellow River Jiluo Road Tunnel. After an overall damage index for the tunnel lining was adopted, the deformation characteristics, damage evolution laws, and failure mechanisms of the tunnel under the additional loads induced by riverbed siltation were systematically investigated. In addition, parametric sensitivity analyses of the longitudinal residual jacking force and bolt diameter were carried out. The results indicated that significant longitudinal non-uniform deformation at the soft-hard stratum interface was induced by the bearing capacity difference between the soft and hard strata. Opening on the hard soil side and dislocation on the soft soil side were exhibited by the circumferential joints, and these structural deformations were aggravated as the additional loads increased. The soft-hard stratum interface was identified as the most sensitive zone for structural deformation and damage accumulation. The compressive damage of the lining was mainly concentrated at the stratum interface, while tensile damage was predominantly distributed on the soft soil side. The transverse deformation of segment rings was verified to be the key factor inducing tensile failure of the tunnel lining. The longitudinal stiffness of the tunnel could be improved by both the longitudinal residual jacking force and the bolt diameter, whereas distinct mechanisms of action on structural responses were observed. A more significant effect on deformation control and damage evolution was exerted by the longitudinal residual jacking force than by the bolt diameter. The longitudinal deformation and circumferential joint dislocation were found to be reduced by the longitudinal residual jacking force, whereas local compressive damage and tensile damage on the soft soil side were aggravated by it. By contrast, the transverse deformation of segments was effectively restrained, and tensile damage was reduced by the increase in bolt diameter. It was demonstrated that the soft-hard stratum interface was regarded as the critical position for the safety control of shield tunnel structures, and the longitudinal residual jacking force was identified as a vital factor affecting the structural stress state and damage development. A reliable reference for the design, construction, and operational safety assessment of shield tunnels in soft-hard heterogeneous strata could be provided by the research results.
Key words:  shield tunnel    soft-hard heterogeneous strata    longitudinal mechanical properties    numerical simulation    damage evaluation
发布日期:  2026-10-12     
中图分类号:  U45  
  TU94  
基金资助: 济南城市建设集团有限公司科技开发计划资助项目(2020W003);中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司科技研究资助项目(TSYSDY-JLLCHSD[2020]-09)
作者简介:  周朋(1987— ),男,湖南常德人,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程. E-mail:674835405@qq.com
引用本文:    
周朋. 附加荷载下盾构隧道穿越软硬不均地层的变形及损伤演化规律[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 76-88.
Zhou Peng. Deformation and damage evolution law of shield tunnels crossing soft-hard heterogeneous strata under additional loads. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(3): 76-88.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I3/76
[1] 何川, 封坤, 方勇. 盾构法修建地铁隧道的技术现状与展望[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2015, 50(1): 97-109. He Chuan, Feng Kun, Fang Yong. Review and prospects on constructing technologies of metro tunnels using shield tunnelling method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(1): 97-109.
[2] Berthoz N, Branque D, Subrin D, et al. Face failure in homogeneous and stratified soft ground: theoretical and experimental approaches on 1g EPBS reduced scale model[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 30: 25-37.
[3] Zhao K, Bonini M, Debernardi D, et al. Computational modelling of the mechanised excavation of deep tunnels in weak rock[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 66: 158-171.
[4] He C, Feng K, Fang Y, et al. Surface settlement caused by twin-parallel shield tunnelling in sandy cobble strata[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2012, 13(11): 858-869.
[5] Shen S L, Wu H N, Cui Y J, et al. Long-term settlement behaviour of metro tunnels in the soft deposits of Shanghai[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 40: 309-323.
[6] Wu H N, Shen S L, Chen R P, et al. Three-dimensional numerical modelling on localised leakage in segmental lining of shield tunnels[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 122: 103549.
[7] Koizumi A, Murakami H, Nishino K. Study on the analytical model of shield tunnel in longitudinal direction[J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1988(394): 79-88.
[8] Shiba Y, Kawashima K, Obinata N, et al. An evaluation method of longitudinal stiffness of shield tunnel linings for application to seismic response analyses[J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1988, 1988(398): 319-327.
[9] 朱合华, 桥本正. 盾构隧道管片接头衬砌系统的两种受力设计模型[J]. 工程力学, 1996, 13(A3): 395-399. Zhu Hehua, Qiao Benzheng. Two stress design models of segment joint lining system in shield tunnel[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 1996, 13(A3): 395-399.
[10] 朱合华, 崔茂玉, 杨金松. 盾构衬砌管片的设计模型与荷载分布的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(2): 190-194. Zhu Hehua, Cui Maoyu, Yang Jinsong. Design model for shield lining segments and distribution of load[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(2): 190-194.
[11] 朱伟, 黄正荣, 梁精华. 盾构衬砌管片的壳-弹簧设计模型研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(8): 940-947. Zhu Wei, Huang Zhengrong, Liang Jinghua. Studies on shell-spring design model for segment of shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(8): 940-947.
[12] 黄正荣. 基于壳—弹簧模型的盾构衬砌管片受力特性研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2007:93-114. Huang Zhengrong. Study on the mechanics character of shield tunnel segment with shell-spring model[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2007:93-114.
[13] 张治国, 陈杰, 朱正国, 等. 基于Kerr地基模型的盾构下穿诱发既有非连续隧道纵向变形分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(11): 2238-2247. Zhang Zhiguo, Chen Jie, Zhu Zhengguo, et al. Longitudinal deformations of existing discontinuous tunnels induced by shield tunneling based on Kerr foundation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(11): 2238-2247.
[14] Guo W Q, Feng K, Mu H X, et al. Analysis method for longitudinal structural response of shield tunnels incorporating iterative updates of circumferential joint bending and shear stiffness[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2026, 175: 107747.
[15] 何川, 郭瑞, 肖明清, 等. 铁路盾构隧道单、双层衬砌纵向力学性能的模型试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2013, 34(3): 40-46. He Chuan, Guo Rui, Xiao Mingqing, et al. Model test on longitudinal mechanical properties of single and double layered linings for railway shield tunnel[J]. China Railway Science, 2013, 34(3): 40-46.
[16] 吴庆, 杜守继. 地面堆载对既有盾构隧道结构影响的试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2014, 10(1): 57-66. Wu Qing, Du Shouji. Model test on influence of ground heaped load on existing shield tunnel structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2014, 10(1): 57-66.
[17] 杨帆. 穿黄超大断面盾构隧道纵向结构性状及设计模式研究[D]. 济南: 济南大学, 2019:35-51. Yang Fan.Study on longitudinal structural behavior and design model of super large section shield tunnel crossing the Yellow River [D]. Jinan:Jinan University, 2019:35-51.
[18] 梁荣柱, 曹世安, 向黎明, 等. 地表堆载作用下盾构隧道纵向受力机制试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2023, 42(3): 736-747. Liang Rongzhu, Cao Shian, Xiang Liming, et al. Experimental investigation on longitudinal mechanical mechanism of shield tunnels subjected to ground surface surcharge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 42(3): 736-747.
[19] 孙廉威, 秦建设, 洪义, 等. 地面堆载下盾构隧道管片与环缝接头的性状分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(8): 1509-1518. Sun Lianwei, Qin Jianshe, Hong Yi, et al. Shield tunnel segment and circumferential joint performance under surface surcharge[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2017, 51(8): 1509-1518.
[20] 张毫毫, 雷明锋, 刘凌晖, 等. 新建隧道下穿施工对既有上卧盾构隧道扰动影响规律研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020, 17(2): 396-404. Zhang Haohao, Lei Mingfeng, Liu Linghui, et al. Study on the influence law of underpass construction of new tunnel on the disturbance of existing upper shield tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 396-404.
[21] 桑运龙, 刘学增, 张强. 基于螺栓-凹凸榫连接的地铁盾构隧道管片环缝接头刚度分析及应用[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(1): 19-27. Sang Yunlong, Liu Xuezeng, Zhang Qiang. Stiffness analysis and application of segment annular joint based on bolt-concave and convex tenon connection in metro shield tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(1): 19-27.
[22] Wang Z, Wang L Z, Li L L, et al. Failure mechanism of tunnel lining joints and bolts with uneven longitudinal ground settlement[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 40: 300-308.
[23] Shi C H, Cao C Y, Lei M F, et al. Effects of lateral unloading on the mechanical and deformation performance of shield tunnel segment joints[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 51: 175-188.
[24] 钟小春, 张金荣, 秦建设, 等. 盾构隧道纵向等效弯曲刚度的简化计算模型及影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(1): 132-136. Zhong Xiaochun, Zhang Jinrong, Qin Jianshe, et al. Simplified calculation model for longitudinal equivalent bending stiffness of shield tunnel and its influence factors' analysis[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 132-136.
[25] Hu J, Chai S B, Wang H C, et al. Longitudinal mechanical properties of shield tunnels crossing soft and hard mutation strata[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2023, 23(12): 04023225.
[26] 阮恒丰, 梁荣柱, 康成, 等. 地表突发堆载作用下地铁盾构隧道变形机制三维精细化数值模拟研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2023, 30(1): 35-45. Ruan Hengfeng, Liang Rongzhu, Kang Cheng, et al. Three-dimensional elaborate numerical modelling analysis on the deformation mechanism of metro shield tunnel induced by sudden surface surcharge[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2023, 30(1): 35-45.
[27] 廖少明, 门燕青, 肖明清, 等. 软土盾构法隧道纵向应力松弛规律的实测分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(5): 795-803. Liao Shaoming, Men Yanqing, Xiao Mingqing, et al. Field tests on longitudinal stress relaxation along shield tunnel in soft ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(5): 795-803.
[28] 沐海星, 封坤, 郭文琦, 等. 超大直径盾构隧道管片结构力学行为与破坏特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025, 62(1): 125-134. Mu Haixing, Feng Kun, Guo Wenqi, et al. Study on the mechanical behavior and failure characteristics of ultra-large diameter shield tunnel segment structures[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2025, 62(1): 125-134.
[29] 门燕青, 李虎, 周建国, 等. 考虑盾构隧道纵向应力松弛的环缝渗漏水计算分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2019(增刊1): 99-105. Men Yanqing, Li Hu, Zhou Jianguo, et al.Calculation of circular joint leakage considering the longitudinal stress relaxation along the shield tunnel[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019(S1): 99-105.
[30] Guo W Q, Feng K, Mu H X, et al. Investigation on the force transmission performance between segmental rings of super-large cross-section shield tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2025, 164: 106779.
[31] Mu H, Feng K, Yang S, et al. Investigation on internal force transmission and failure characteristics of segmental linings for super-large cross-section shield tunnels[J]. Structures, 2025, 74: 108564.
[32] GB 50010—2002 混凝土结构设计规范[S].
[33] Sidoroff F. Description of anisotropic damage application to elasticity[C] //PhysicalNon-Linearities in Structural Analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1981: 237-244.
[34] 郭建光, 王星, 董唱唱, 等. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80. Guo Jianguang, Wang Xing, Dong Changchang, et al. Study on tunnel segment uplift under the coupled effect of grout time-dependent properties and segmental friction[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[35] 杨绍毅, 封坤, 沐海星, 等. 穿越土-岩复合地层的盾构隧道纵向地震响应研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2024, 57(增刊2): 133-141. Yang Shaoyi, Feng Kun, Mu Haixing, et al. Study on longitudinal seismic response of shield tunnel crossing soil-rock composite strata[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2024, 57(S2): 133-141.
[36] Mu H X, Feng K, Li J L, et al. Influence of inclination angle on the failure mechanisms and shear capacity of concave-convex tenon connections in shield tunnel joints[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2026, 174: 107700.
[37] 郑贺民, 刘雪婷, 秦承帅, 等. 海相软土高铁隧道管-土相互作用试验研究与数值分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 1-16. Zheng Hemin, Liu Xueting, Qin Chengshuai, et al. Experimental investigation and numerical analysis of pipeline-soil interaction in high-speed railway tunnel in marine soft soil[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(2): 1-16.
[38] Huang Z, Zhang C L, Ma S K, et al. Study of the mechanical behaviour and damage characteristics of three new types of joints for fabricated rectangular tunnels using a numerical approach[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 118: 104184.
[39] Wu H N, Chen S, Chen R P, et al. Deformation behaviors and failure mechanism of segmental RC lining under unloading condition[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 130: 104687.
[40] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 等. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47. Li Zhang, Bai Sen, Zheng Jianguo, et al. The influence of foundation pit excavation on the surrounding soil pressure and deformation of existing shield tunnel in Xi'an loess stratum[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[1] 孙文昊,许为民,何应道,历朋林,张锦程,张亮亮. 黄河中下游公铁合建盾构隧道设计关键技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 1-9.
[2] 赵世超,王剑宏,王超,鲁佳霖,杜昌言. 双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 23-30.
[3] 陈俊伟,施江杰,全良臣,张宇. 基于软硬件实时交互的大直径盾构隧道管片收敛变形监测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 45-55.
[4] 罗驰恒,郭元俊,贾瑶,姜学鹏. 盾构隧道疏散通道临界防烟风速计算模型研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 66-75.
[5] 董瑞兴,李杨,张东,王利民,马千里,赵洪岩,董宏宇. 卵漂石地层盾构隧道漂石滞排对地表沉降影响试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 102-116.
[6] 马超, 乔法宇, 王国盛, 梁靖宇, 路德春. FRCM加固盾构隧道管片接头提升结构整体力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 22-31.
[7] 仝跃, 朱子越, 陈俊武, 张东明, 张伟. 无中导连拱隧道施工力学性态分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 43-58.
[8] 靳高汉,高成路,周宗青,涂汉臣,王迪军,张志良,袁泉,李萧翰. 多层地铁车站水淹过程时空演化特征数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 53-64.
[9] 张小龙,郭明耀,向宇. 大断面竖井二次衬砌满堂支架设计及稳定性分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 124-134.
[10] 王雁冰, 张芳平, 李守业, 彭会椿, 雷振. 三向围压与液氧爆破荷载耦合作用下红砂岩损伤破裂特征研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 58-71.
[11] 金阳,姚颖康,刘汶,姬付全,曹昂. 不耦合偏心装药孔壁压力与岩体动态响应特性数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 83-92.
[12] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[13] 丁建奇, 王陈成, 朱向闪, 张翔, 傅刚, 徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
[14] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 于永堂, 朱才辉. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[15] 苟晓军, 赵金泉, 季玮, 花晓鸣, 范占锋. 隧道不良地质构造雷达特征数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 68-82.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn