Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (2): 102-116    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.02.09
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
卵漂石地层盾构隧道漂石滞排对地表沉降影响试验研究
董瑞兴1,李杨1,2*,张东3,王利民3,马千里3,赵洪岩3,董宏宇3
1. 长沙理工大学土木与环境工程学院, 湖南 长沙 410001;2. 交通基础设施安全风险管理交通运输行业重点实验室, 湖南 长沙 410001;3. 北京建工土木工程有限公司, 北京 100055
Experimental study on the influence of cobble blocking on surface settlement in shield tunneling through cobble-boulder stratum
DONG Ruixing1, LI Yang1,2*, ZHANG Dong3, WANG Limin3, MA Qianli3, ZHAO Hongyan3, DONG Hongyu3
1. Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410001, Hunan, China;
2. Industry Key Laboratory of Traffic Infrastructure Security Risk Management, Changsha 410001, Hunan, China;
3. Beijing Construction Engineering Group Civil Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100055, China
下载:  PDF (28766KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 卵漂石地层盾构施工常伴随对地层的极大扰动与地表坍塌风险,针对该问题现有研究多采用经验手段预判及防治,对于定量预警卵漂石地层失稳风险等研究相对缺乏。本研究依托北京地铁1号线支线泥水平衡盾构隧道工程,开展室内盾构掘进模型试验,探究盾构掘进过程中刀盘前方漂石滞排对地表沉降规律及地层坍塌演化过程的影响。研究结果表明,受大粒径骨架及非连续介质特性影响,卵漂石地层表现出显著的地表滞后沉降现象,演化过程大致可划分为“缓慢发展—急剧增加—暂时稳定—坍塌破坏”4个阶段;卵漂石地层的地层损失率为7%~10%,远超常规砂土地层,且随着漂石滞排量的增加,地层损失率不断增大;当漂石滞排率超过30%临界值时极易引发地表塌陷,通常发生在盾构穿越对应测点约0.5 D(D为隧道直径)距离后;刀盘前方大粒径卵漂石聚集量对盾构扰动范围影响显著,漂石滞排加剧了盾构超挖量,致使开挖面正上方及周边地层产生明显空洞,整体稳定性显著降低。研究成果为类似工程中漂石滞排导致地表塌陷提供了定量的预警指标与理论支撑。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
董瑞兴
李杨
张东
王利民
马千里
赵洪岩
董宏宇
关键词:  卵漂石地层  盾构隧道  室内模型试验  漂石滞排  地表沉降规律    
Abstract: Shield tunneling in cobble-boulder stratum was frequently accompanied by significant ground disturbance and a high risk of surface collapse. For the prediction and mitigation of this problem, empirical methods were primarily relied upon in current practice, leaving a notable gap in quantitative early-warning research on stratum instability. Based on the slurry shield tunneling project of the Beijing Subway Line 1 Branch, laboratory model tests were conducted to investigate the impact of cobble blocking in front of the cutterhead on surface settlement patterns and the evolutionary process of stratum collapse. The results indicated that, influenced by the large-particle granular skeleton and discontinuous medium characteristics, the cobble-boulder stratum exhibited a significant delayed surface settlement phenomenon. This evolutionary process could be broadly divided into four stages: slow development, rapid increase, temporary stability, and collapse failure. A ground loss ratio of approximately 7% to 10% was observed in the cobble-boulder stratum, significantly exceeding that of conventional sandy strata. Furthermore, this ratio continuously increased as the volume of stagnant boulders increased. When the boulder stagnation rate exceeded a critical threshold of 30%, surface collapse was highly likely to be triggered, typically occurring after the shield machine passed the corresponding monitoring point by a distance of approximately 0.5 D (where D is the tunnel diameter). The accumulation of large-diameter boulders in front of the cutterhead profoundly affected the shield's disturbance range; stagnant boulders exacerbated over-excavation, causing prominent cavities directly above the excavation face and in the surrounding stratum, and substantially reducing overall stability. These findings provided quantitative early-warning indicators and theoretical support for mitigating surface collapse induced by cobble blocking in similar engineering projects.
Key words:  cobble-boulder stratum    shield tunnel    laboratory model test    cobble blocking    ground surface settlement patternReceived: 2026-03-16    Revised: 2026-04-28    Accepted: 2026-05-21    Published: 2026-06-20
发布日期:  2026-07-07     
中图分类号:  U45  
  U455.43  
基金资助: 湖南省自然科学基金面上资助项目(2025JJ20042);湖南省教育厅科研资助项目(24C0141)
作者简介:  董瑞兴(2001— ),男,湖北黄石人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程. E-mail: 17720294809@163.com. *通信作者简介:李杨(1988— ),男,湖南长沙人,讲师,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程. E-mail: liyang@csust.edu.cn
引用本文:    
董瑞兴,李杨,张东,王利民,马千里,赵洪岩,董宏宇. 卵漂石地层盾构隧道漂石滞排对地表沉降影响试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 102-116.
DONG Ruixing, LI Yang, ZHANG Dong, WANG Limin, MA Qianli, ZHAO Hongyan, DONG Hongyu. Experimental study on the influence of cobble blocking on surface settlement in shield tunneling through cobble-boulder stratum. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(2): 102-116.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I2/102
[1] 魏纲, 朱德涵, 王哲, 等. 复合成层地层双线水平盾构隧道施工引起土体变形研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2024, 44(8): 1544-1553. WEI Gang, ZHU Dehan, WANG Zhe, et al. Soil deformation caused by double-track horizontal shield tunneling under composite layered strata[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2024, 44(8): 1544-1553.
[2] SHANG X F, MIAO S J, WANG H, et al. A prediction model for surface settlement during the construction of variable cross-section tunnels under existing structures based on stochastic medium theory[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2025, 155: 106177.
[3] 钱七虎. 科学利用城市地下空间, 建设和谐宜居、美丽城市[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(1): 1-7. QIAN Qihu. Scientific use of the urban underground space to construction the harmonious livable and beautiful city[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 1-7.
[4] 谢亦朋, 杨秀竹, 阳军生, 等. 松散堆积体隧道围岩变形破坏细观特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4925-4934. XIE Yipeng, YANG Xiuzhu, YANG Junsheng, et al. Mesoscopic characteristics of deformation and failure on surrounding rocks of tunnel through loose deposits[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4925-4934.
[5] WANG F, DU X L, LI P F. Prediction of subsurface settlement induced by shield tunnelling in sandy cobble stratum[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 16(1): 192-212.
[6] 昝文博, 赖金星, 邱军领, 等. 松散堆积体隧道压力拱效应试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(9): 1666-1674. ZAN Wenbo, LAI Jinxing, QIU Junling, et al. Experiments and numerical simulations on pressure-arch effect for a tunnel in loose deposits[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(9): 1666-1674.
[7] LIU X R, XIONG F, ZHOU X H, et al. Physical model test on the influence of the cutter head opening ratio on slurry shield tunnelling in a cobble layer[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 120: 104264.
[8] 戴志仁, 张莎莎, 李国良, 等. 城轨地下工程建设诱发地表坍塌机制及应对措施[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2025, 45(8): 1451-1458. DAI Zhiren, ZHANG Shasha, LI Guoliang, et al. Surface collapse mechanism induced by rail transit underground engineering and corresponding countermeasures[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2025, 45(8): 1451-1458.
[9] 赵辰洋, 罗毛毛, 邱静怡, 等. 盾构隧道施工引起地层变形预测方法综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 31-46. ZHAO Chenyang, LUO Maomao, QIU Jingyi, et al. Prediction of shield tunnelling induced ground movements: the state-of-the-art[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 31-46.
[10] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 等. 高卵石含量地层盾构隧道施工围岩扰动特征试验研究[J/OL]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2025(2025-07-29)[2026-03-16]. https://link. cnki. net/urlid/50.1218.TU.20250728.1404.002 SONG Weitao, ZHANG Pei, DU Xiu, et al. Experimental study on the ground disturbance characteristics during shield tunneling in high cobble content strata[J/OL]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2025(2025-07-29)[2026-03-16]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/50.1218.TU.20250728.1404.002
[11] 王炜, 刘招伟, 邵小康, 等. 漂石地层不同刀盘型式盾构掘进试验[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(14): 5884-5889. WANG Wei, LIU Zhaowei, SHAO Xiaokang, et al. Test on shield tunneling with different cutterhead types in boulders[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(14): 5884-5889.
[12] 陈天明. 高原富水冰碛隧道洞内坍塌成因与处置技术研究: 以拉林铁路米林隧道为例[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(2):274-282. CHEN Tianming. Causes and countermeasures for collapse in a water-rich moraine tunnel in a plateau area: a case study on Milin Tunnel of Lhasa-Nyingchi Railway[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(2): 274-282.
[13] HU X Y, HE C, WALTON G, et al. Laboratory model test of EPB shield tunneling in a cobble-rich soil[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 146(10): 04020112.
[14] 刘招伟. 卵石-漂石地层盾构隧道穿越铁路编组工程技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(4): 226-233. LIU Zhaowei. Research on the technology for the shield tunnel crossing the railway marshalling station in the pebble-boulder stratum[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2022, 59(4): 226-233.
[15] 吴锋波, 金淮, 杨歧焱, 等. 北京地铁隧道地表横向沉降槽参数分析[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(5):660-671. WU Fengbo, JIN Huai, YANG Qiyan, et al. Analysis of ground transverse settlement groove parameters of Beijing Metro tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(5): 660-671.
[16] QIAO N, PENG Q, TAN H H, et al. Collapse mechanism of tunnel face in boulder-bearing strata: an MPM study[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2026, 191: 107783.
[17] 程韬, 郭洋洋, 有智慧. 大粒径富水卵石地层盾构下穿既有线技术措施[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(增刊1): 224-231. CHENG Tao, GUO Yangyang, YOU Zhihui. Technical measures for shield tunneling through operating metro line in large diameter water-rich sandy pebble stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16(Suppl.1): 224-231.
[18] 昝文博, 赖金星, 曹校勇, 等. 漂卵石隧道围岩力学响应与失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(8): 1643-1653. ZAN Wenbo, LAI Jinxing, CAO Xiaoyong, et al. Mechanical responses and instability failure mechanisms of surrounding rock of tunnels in boulder-cobble mixed stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(8): 1643-1653.
[19] 马相峰, 王立川, 龚伦, 等. 砂卵石地层双线地铁盾构下穿铁路路基变形及地层注浆加固研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(增刊1): 181-189. MA Xiangfeng, WANG Lichuan, GONG Lun, et al. Deformation and grouting reinforcement for railway subgrade crossed by a double-track metro shield tunnel in sandy-cobble strata[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(Suppl. 1): 181-189.
[20] LI Q Q, ZHANG P, DU X L, et al. Estimating tunnelling-induced ground deformation in sandy cobble stratum considering rock content variation[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2024, 42(6): 4563-4580.
[21] HUO M Z, CHEN W Z, YUAN J Q, et al. Experimental investigation and limit analysis of shield tunnel face failure mechanism in sand[J]. Underground Space, 2025, 22: 137-152.
[22] LIN Q T, LU D C, GUO C X, et al. Collapse behavior and mechanical response of the cobble stratum during the shield driving[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 144: 105507.
[23] QIN Y W, LAI J X, CAO X Y, et al. Experimental study on the collapse evolution law of unlined tunnel in Boulder-Cobble mixed formation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 139(9): 105164.
[24] 温瑜琴. 超大直径盾构施工砂土地层变形规律及控制方法研究[D]. 深圳: 深圳大学, 2022: 31-32. WEN Yuqin. Study on deformation and control of sand stratum based on super-large diameter shield tunneling[D]. Shenzhen: Shenzhen University, 2022: 31-32.
[25] 童里, 李达, 李树忱, 等. 基于CFD-DEM耦合的泥水平衡盾构排浆管卵石滞排研究[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 114-124. TONG Li, LI Da, LI Shuchen, et al. Research on pebble slagging stagnation of slurry balance shield drain pipe based on CFD-DEM coupling[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), 2025, 55(2): 114-124.
[26] 孙靖杰. 砂卵石地层损失引起地表变形特征研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020: 69-71. SUN Jingjie. Study on the characteristics of surface deformation caused by loss of sandy pebble stratum[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020: 69-71.
[27] XU Q W, XIE J L, WANG W X, et al. Experimental and DEM simulation study on the disturbance of sandy pebble stratum by shield tunneling[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2025, 20(7): 3349-3372.
[28] 王焕. 大直径泥水盾构穿越无加固条件沉降敏感带扰动控制技术研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(2): 107-113. WANG Huan. Disturbance control technology for large diameter slurry shield crossing the sensitive zone without reinforcement conditions[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2): 107-113.
[1] 马超, 乔法宇, 王国盛, 梁靖宇, 路德春. FRCM加固盾构隧道管片接头提升结构整体力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 22-31.
[2] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[3] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 于永堂, 朱才辉. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[4] 孙超, 张光伟, 答武强, 余祖峰. 临山条件下大直径盾构隧道抗浮控制技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 27-37.
[5] 赵泽乾, 朱旻, 包小华, 杨春山, 陈湘生. 下穿码头危化品堆场的超大直径盾构隧道抗爆性能评估方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 61-71.
[6] 王宏超,胡军,周永强,付晓东. 二次衬砌施作时机对盾构隧道纵向力学性能的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 99-112.
[7] 闫治国, 王紫锐, 沈奕, 刘康. 碳氢曲线下大直径盾构隧道结构热力特性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 25-36.
[8] 孙齐昊, 舒计城, 范森, 柳献. 降水与回灌水抢险作用机制的试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 33-46.
[9] 王伟, 刘英, 庄海洋, 赵凯, 陈国兴. 考虑内部结构的大直径盾构隧道抗震性能[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 78-85.
[10] 宗军良, 饶倩, 王祺, 禹海涛. 地面出入式盾构隧道动力响应的数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 63-70.
[11] 加瑞, 杨岗, 郑刚. 盾构隧道施工历史对隧道地震响应的影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 41-51.
[12] 魏纲, 徐天宝, 张治国. 复杂应力路径下波纹钢加固盾构隧道数值分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 24-32.
[13] 王智, 刘祥勇, 朱先发, 洪小星, 沈一鸣, 张冰利. 小曲率半径隧道施工对盾构管片结构影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 45-54.
[14] 韩兴博, 陈子明, 苏恩杰, 梁晓明, 宋桂峰, 叶飞. 盾构隧道围岩压力分布规律及作用模式[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 34-43.
[15] 喻伟, 林赞权, 朱彬彬, 汪元冶, 丁文其, 乔亚飞, 张晓东, 龚琛杰. 盾构隧道防水密封垫材料的高温老化后性能[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 52-58.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn