Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2025, Vol. 7 Issue (1): 22-34    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2025.01.03
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制
丁建奇1,王陈成2,朱向闪1,张翔1,傅刚1,徐敬民2*
1.江苏省铁路集团有限公司江苏省智能与绿色铁路工程研究中心, 江苏 南京 210049;2.东南大学交通学院, 江苏 南京 211189
Influence mechanism of large diameter tunnel construction on adjacent buildings
DING Jianqi1, WANG Chencheng2, ZHU Xiangshan1, ZHANG Xiang1, FU Gang1, XU Jingmin2*
1. Jiangsu Intelligent and Green Railway Engineering Research Center, Jiangsu Railway Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210049, Jiangsu, China;
2. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China
下载:  PDF (13794KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本研究基于上元门过江隧道所穿越的江南段区域建筑实际工况,建立三维数值模拟有限元模型,通过位移控制法模拟隧道施工后逐步产生地层损失的过程,并在模拟完成后提取土体与框架结构的沉降与水平位移,以及框架结构各隔间的位移与应变,分析大直径隧道施工引起的框架结构位移与应变分布和发展规律。研究结果表明:建筑框架结构板基础沉降随与隧道中轴线距离增大而减小,水平位移则近似保持在稳定值,小于基础下地层水平位移;框架结构的水平位移分布规律与隧道穿越关系有关,被隧道正穿的建筑上部水平位移小于下部,被隧道侧穿的建筑上部水平位移大于下部,而框架结构沉降则在竖直方向上变化幅度相对较小;框架结构隔间总竖直位移随隧道体积损失率增大而增大,且主要由剪切位移组成;剪切应变也随隧道体积损失率增大而增大,且被隧道下穿的建筑或距离隧道较近的侧穿建筑剪切应变一般较大,同时对于多隔间下穿建筑,剪切应变沿隔间变化曲线近似为正余弦曲线。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
丁建奇
王陈成
朱向闪
张翔
傅刚
徐敬民
关键词:  隧道工程  建筑变形  数值模拟  地表移动    
Abstract: This research was based on the actual working conditions of buildings in the Jiangnan section crossed by the Shangyuanmen Cross River Tunnel. A three-dimensional numerical simulation finite element model was established to simulate the gradual formation loss process after tunnel construction through displacement control method. After the simulation was completed, the settlement and horizontal displacement of the soil and frame structure, as well as the displacement and strain of each compartment of the frame structure, were extracted to analyze the displacement and strain distribution and development law of the frame structure caused by large-diameter tunnel construction. The research results showed that the settlement of the foundation of building frame structural plates decreased with increasing distance from the tunnel axis, while the horizontal displacement remained approximately at a stable value, which was smaller than the horizontal displacement of the underlying strata; The horizontal displacement distribution law of the frame structure was related to the tunnel crossing relationship. The horizontal displacement of the upper part of the building directly penetrated by the tunnel was smaller than that of the lower part, and the horizontal displacement of the upper part of the building laterally penetrated by the tunnel was larger than that of the lower part. However, the settlement of the frame structure changed relatively little in the vertical direction; The total vertical displacements of frame structure compartments increased with the increase of tunnel volume loss rate, and was mainly composed of shear displacement; The shear strain also increased with the increase of the volume loss rate of the tunnel, and the shear strain of buildings that were penetrated by the tunnel or buildings that were close to the tunnel were generally larger. At the same time, for multi compartment penetrating buildings, the shear strain along the compartment variation curve approximated a sine cosine curve.
Key words:  tunnel engineering    building deformation    numerical simulation    ground settlementReceived: 2024-12-26    Revised: 2025-02-28    Accepted: 2025-03-04    Published: 2025-03-20
发布日期:  2025-03-28     
中图分类号:  U43  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52108364,52478389);江苏省交通运输科技资助项目(2023G08)
作者简介:  丁建奇(1965— ),男,江苏常州人,正高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为隧道与铁道工程. E-mail:1510189685@qq.com. *通信作者简介:徐敬民(1992— ),男,河南永城人,讲师,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道施工灾害防控与风险评估. E-mail:jingmin_xu@seu.edu.cn
引用本文:    
丁建奇,王陈成,朱向闪,张翔,傅刚,徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
DING Jianqi, WANG Chencheng, ZHU Xiangshan, ZHANG Xiang, FU Gang, XU Jingmin. Influence mechanism of large diameter tunnel construction on adjacent buildings. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2025/V7/I1/22
[1] PECK R B. Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground[C] // ISSMGE. International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. London, UK: ISSMGE, 1969: 311-375.
[2] 刘庭金, 陈培钊, 蔡良怡, 等. 盾构下穿诱发框架结构沉降实测与模拟分析[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2024, 53(4): 74-80. LIU Tingjin, CHEN Peizhao, CAI Liangyi, et al. Settlement monitoring and simulation analysis of frame structure induced by shield tunneling[J]. Construction Technology, 2024, 53(4): 74-80.
[3] 孙庆, 杨敏, 冉侠, 等. 隧道开挖对周围土体及桩基影响的试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(7): 989-993. SUN Qing, YANG Min, RAN Xia, et al. Test study on tunnelling-induced soil movements and pile responses[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2011, 39(7): 989-993.
[4] 房倩, 杜建明, 王赶, 等. 砂土隧道开挖地层变形规律及影响因素分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 67-76. FANG Qian, DU Jianming, WANG Gan, et al. Stratum deformation laws and influence factors analysis of tunnel excavation in sand[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2020, 2(3): 67-76.
[5] 赵辰洋, 罗毛毛, 邱静怡, 等. 盾构隧道施工引起地层变形预测方法综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 31-46. ZHAO Chenyang, LUO Maomao, QIU Jingyi, et al. Prediction of shield tunnelling induced ground movements: the state-of-the-art[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 31-46.
[6] ALEC M. Tunnelling in sand and its effect on pipelines and piles[D]. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, 2009.
[7] MARSHALL A M, FARREL R, KLAR A, et al. Tunnels in sands:the effect of size, depth and volume loss on greenfield displacements[J]. Géotechnique, 2012, 62(5): 385-399.
[8] 曹利强,张顶立,房倩,等. 软硬不均地层中盾构施工引起的地层隆沉预测[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(3): 634-648. CAO Liqiang, ZHANG Dingli, FANG Qian, et al. Ground vertical displacements due to shield tunnelling in double-layer soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(3): 634-648.
[9] 房倩, 杜建明, 王赶, 等. 模型边界对圆形隧道开挖引起地表沉降的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1):10-17. FANG Qian, DU Jianming, WANG Gan, et al. Influence of model boundary on ground settlement caused by excavation of a circular tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(1):10-17.
[10] 徐敬民, 章定文, 刘松玉. 地表框架结构作用下隧道施工诱发的砂质地层变形[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(4): 602-612. XU Jingmin, ZHANG Dingwen, LIU Songyu. Tunneling-induced sandy ground deformation affected by surface framed structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(4): 602-612.
[11] BOONE S J. Ground-movement-related building damage[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(11): 886-896.
[12] GOH K H, MAIR R J. Response of framed buildings to excavation-induced movements[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2014, 54(3): 250-268.
[13] BILOTTA E, PAOLILLO A, RUSSO G, et al. Displacements induced by tunnelling under a historical building[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 61: 221-232.
[14] 徐礼华, 艾心荧, 余佳力, 等. 厦门机场路隧道施工对砌体结构建筑物的影响分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(3):583-592. XU Lihua, AI Xinying, YU Jiali, et al. Analysis of impact of tunnel construction on masonry buildings in Xiamen airport road[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(3): 583-592.
[15] 刘祥勇, 张鑫, 王军, 等. 盾构施工对邻近建筑物群结构影响评价[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 99-106. LIU Xiangyong, ZHANG Xin, WANG Jun, et al. Evaluation of shield tunneling-induced structural response[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 99-106.
[16] 马险峰, 陈飞, 吴冰, 等. 顶管电缆隧道施工对邻近建筑物和地下管线的扰动影响[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(21): 9074-9080. MA Xianfeng, CHEN Fei, WU Bing, et al. Effect of pipe jacking cable tunnel construction on adjacent buildings and underground pipelines[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(21):9074-9080.
[17] 葛婷婷, 王安立, 王艳, 等. 隧道施工对上覆框架结构建筑物的影响[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(3): 759-764. GE Tingting, WANG Anli, WANG Yan, et al. Influence of tunnel construction on the overlying frame structure building[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017, 13(3): 759-764.
[18] 杨军, 黄钞. 盾构隧道下穿既有建筑施工监控分析[J]. 交通科技, 2024(1):86-91. YANG Jun, HUANG Chao. Analysis ofconstraction monitoring for shield tunnel undercrossing existing buildings[J]. Transportation Science & Technology, 2024(1): 86-91.
[19] LIU Y, ZHANG Q H, LIU W, et al. Model test study on the response of two different shallow-foundation framed buildings under tunnel volume loss[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(9): 2270.
[20] 李祥钰, 郭靖, 赵越, 等. 大直径盾构隧道工程施工风险分析及施工措施[J]. 城市建筑, 2024, 21(14): 205-208. LI Xiangyu, GUO Jing, ZHAO Yue, et al. Analysis on construction risks of large diameter shield tunnel project and its construction measures[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2024, 21(14): 205-208.
[21] 刘德军, 乔可可, 商奇, 等. 复合地层大直径盾构隧道侧穿既有桩基扰动影响研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2024, 53(6):1144-1156. LIU Dejun, QIAO Keke, SHANG Qi, et al. Research on the disturbance effects of large-diameter shield tunneling side-crossing on existing pile foundations in composite strata[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2024, 53(6): 1144-1156.
[22] 张亚洲, 王善高, 闵凡路. 大直径泥水盾构下穿民房建筑群沉降分析及控制[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2016, 36(6): 959-964. ZHANG Yazhou,WANG Shangao, MIN Fanlu. Analysis and control of ground settlement caused by slurry shield tunneling crossing buildings in the Weisanlu Yangtze River Tunnel[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016, 36(6): 959-964.
[23] 温竹茵. 软土地区大直径盾构隧道下穿老旧房屋技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(增刊1): 928-933. WEN Zhuyin. Study on technology of large diameter shield tunnel underpassing old houses in soft soil area[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2022, 59(Suppl.1): 928-933.
[24] 徐敬民, 徐成华, 施烨辉, 等. 隧道施工引起的松砂土层与地表结构响应[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2023, 23(4): 190-204. XU Jingmin, XU Chenghua, SHI Yehui, et al. Responses of loose sand ground and surface structure caused by tunnel construction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(4): 190-204.
[25] VERRUIJT A, BOOKER J R. Surface settlements due to deformation of a tunnel in an elastic half plane[J]. Géotechnique, 1996, 46(4): 753-756.
[26] SONG G Y, MARSHALL A M. Centrifuge modelling of tunnelling induced ground displacements: pressure and displacement control tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 103: 103461.
[27] BOONSIRI I, TAKEMURA J. Observation of ground movement with existing pile groups due to tunneling in sand using centrifuge modelling[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2015, 33(3): 621-640.
[28] FU J Y, YU Z W, WANG S Y, et al. Numerical analysis of framed building response to tunnelling induced ground movements[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 158: 43-66.
[29] 黄兴, 姚超凡, 周洋, 等. 砂质地层盾构下穿建筑注浆加固体参数优化[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2024, 27(7): 133-140. HUANG Xing, YAO Chaofan, ZHOU Yang, et al. Optimization of grouting reinforcement mass parameters for shield under-passing buildings in sandy stratum[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2024, 27(7): 133-140.
[30] VON WOLFFERSDORFF P A. Ahypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface[J]. Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, 1996, 1(3): 251-271.
[31] HERLE I, GUDEHUS G. Determination of parameters of ahypoplastic constitutive model from properties of grain assemblies[J]. Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials, 1999, 4(5): 461-486.
[32] COOK D A. Studies of settlement and crack damage in old and new facades[C] //Proceedings of the 3rd International Masonry Conference. London, UK: International Masonry Society, 1992: 203-211.
[33] BOSCARDIN M D, CORDING E J. Building response to excavation-induced settlement[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 115(1): 1-21.
[1] 王圣涛, 陈鹏涛, 刘爱武, 孙文昊, 张俊儒. 特大跨连续变断面隧道双导洞超前-中柱反向扩挖的施工力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 1-11.
[2] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 杨家伟, 蔡遵乐. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[3] 赵泽乾, 朱旻, 包小华, 杨春山, 陈湘生. 下穿码头危化品堆场的超大直径盾构隧道抗爆性能评估方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 61-71.
[4] 纪禄凌,游玮,李晓逸,曾原驰,刘毓氚,张铠. 增设压力阀对隧道防排水影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 92-102.
[5] 杨立,夏增选,娄文杰,刘杉,李奉庭,武科. 山区深埋公路隧道穿越断层破碎带施工稳定性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 32-42.
[6] 闫治国, 王紫锐, 沈奕, 刘康. 碳氢曲线下大直径盾构隧道结构热力特性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 25-36.
[7] 田瑞端,莫冠旺,李响. 超大断面扁平结构隧道矿山法超欠挖优化控制研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 84-98.
[8] 刘向阳,罗兵兵,吴静,张学富,黄耀明,李林杰. 高地温施工隧道冰块与通风组合降温效果对比研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 66-75.
[9] 黄震,叶张骞,张嘉伟,彭子茂,严展硕. 膨胀型防火涂料对装配式框架隧道耐火性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 46-58.
[10] 彭益, 张文, 王汉勋, 张彬, 孙哲. 某海岛地下水封油库渗流场数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(1): 94-104.
[11] 张宁, 黄新杰, 王川, 徐彬, 张建成, 张波. 高压水射流切割混凝土试验与数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 47-56.
[12] 王伟, 刘英, 庄海洋, 赵凯, 陈国兴. 考虑内部结构的大直径盾构隧道抗震性能[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 78-85.
[13] 孙港, 王军祥, 孟祥竹, 郭连军, 孙杰. 基于近场动力学理论的岩石双孔爆破动态断裂行为数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 42-58.
[14] 黄兴, 张炜, 殷建钢, 施皓, 张晓磊. 填埋场扩建后下穿隧道结构的安全性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 55-63.
[15] 赵兴东, 窦翔, 李勇, 王立君. 基于Ventsim的地下水封洞库建造期通风方式优选[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 8-17.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn