Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2025, Vol. 7 Issue (3): 93-104    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2025.03.08
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于SPH-FEM耦合模拟的隧道深埋排水沟爆破技术优化研究
张海兰1,吴云鹏1,邹仁1,马晓龙2,李坤泰3,高启栋3*,牛磊4,周海孝3
1.中铁五局集团有限公司, 湖南 长沙 410007;2.青海省交通建设管理有限公司, 青海 西宁 810008;3.长安大学公路学院, 陕西 西安 710064;4.兰州理工大学, 甘肃 兰州 730050
Optimization study of blasting technology for deeply buried drainage trench in tunnel based on SPH-FEM coupled simulation
ZHANG Hailan1, WU Yunpeng1, ZOU Ren1, MA Xiaolong2, LI Kuntai3,GAO Qidong3*, NIU Lei4, ZHOU Haixiao3
1. China Railway No.5 Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Changsha 410007, Hunan, China;
2. Qinghai Provincial Transportation Construction Management Co., Ltd., Xining 810008, Qinghai, China;
3. School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China;
4. Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China
下载:  PDF (17480KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为提高通排水效率并保障隧道运行安全,依托青海赛尔龙2号隧道施工,建立了SPH-FEM(smoothed particle hydrodynamics-finite element method)耦合计算模型,对比了不同布孔方式(垂直布孔与楔形布孔)下的岩石损伤演化、爆破槽腔尺寸及岩石抛掷效果。研究结果表明:垂直布孔与楔形布孔条件下,岩体整体损伤范围基本一致,但楔形布孔时沟槽底板易产生超欠挖,不利于爆破成型控制。不同布孔方式下爆破轮廓形状相近,相比于垂直布孔,采用楔形布孔更有利于提升槽腔体积与槽腔口面积。从轮廓成型效果及粒子抛掷效率的角度,对楔形钻孔炮孔布置方案进行了优化,可在保证轮廓成型效果及粒子抛掷数量的同时,降低粒子的抛掷速度,为深埋排水沟高效成型提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张海兰
吴云鹏
邹仁
马晓龙
李坤泰
高启栋
牛磊
周海孝
关键词:  隧道工程  排水沟爆破  爆破槽腔  爆破损伤  抛掷效果  SPH-FEM耦合算法    
Abstract: To improve drainage efficiency and ensure tunnel operational safety, an SPH-FEM(smoothed particle hydrodynamics-finite element method)coupled computational model was established based on the construction of the Qinghai Saierlong No. 2 Tunnel. A comparison was made of rock damage evolution, blast-induced cavity dimensions, and rock ejection effects under different borehole arrangements(vertical drilling and wedge-shaped drilling). The research results showed that the overall extent of rock damage was generally consistent under both drilling patterns. However, wedge-shaped drilling was more prone to overbreak or underbreak at the trench bottom, which was unfavorable for blast-induced contour control. Although the blast contours were similar under both configurations, wedge-shaped drilling resulted in a larger cavity volume and a wider cavity opening compared to vertical drilling. The wedge-shaped drilling layout was optimized considering contour quality and particle ejection efficiency. This optimization reduced the particle ejection velocity while maintaining satisfactory contour formation and particle ejection quantity, thereby providing a reference for the efficient construction of deep-buried drainage ditches.
Key words:  tunneling    drainage trench blasting    blasting slot cavity    blast damage    throwing effect    SPH-FEM coupling algorithm
发布日期:  2025-09-19     
中图分类号:  U43  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52379096);陕西省创新能力支撑计划资助项目(2023-CX-TD-35);陕西省交通运输厅交通科技资助项目(23-79K);长安大学青年学者学科交叉团队建设资助项目(300104240925)
作者简介:  张海兰(1972— ),男,湖南郴州人,工程师,主要研究方向为隧道施工. E-mail:1254440731@qq.com. *通信作者简介:高启栋(1991— ),男,陕西延安人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道与工程爆破与岩石动力学. E-mail:qdgao@chd.edu.cn
引用本文:    
张海兰, 吴云鹏, 邹仁, 马晓龙, 李坤泰, 高启栋, 牛磊, 周海孝. 基于SPH-FEM耦合模拟的隧道深埋排水沟爆破技术优化研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 93-104.
ZHANG Hailan, WU Yunpeng, ZOU Ren, MA Xiaolong, LI Kuntai, GAO Qidong, NIU Lei, ZHOU Haixiao. Optimization study of blasting technology for deeply buried drainage trench in tunnel based on SPH-FEM coupled simulation. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(3): 93-104.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2025/V7/I3/93
[1] 高文学, 刘运通, 万元林, 等. 沟槽石方基础施工技术研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(增刊1): 4872-4876. GAO Wenxue, LIU Yuntong, WAN Yuanlin, et al. Construction techniques research on rock ditching foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(Suppl.1): 4872-4876.
[2] 张宪堂, 高文乐, 张金泉, 等. 天然气管道沟槽石方爆破开挖技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(增刊2): 1045-1049. ZHANG Xiantang, GAO Wenle, ZHANG Jinquan, et al. Research on blasting excavation techniques for rock ditching of natural gas ducts[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(Suppl.2): 1045-1049.
[3] 王振浩. 基于光面爆破原理的隧道中心沟槽爆破方法[J]. 工程爆破, 2022, 28(3): 47-54. WANG Zhenhao. Tunnel center trench blasting method based on smooth blasting principles[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2022, 28(3): 47-54.
[4] 雷振, 孙鹏昌, 卢文波, 等. 沟槽开挖成型爆破参数优化[J]. 工程爆破, 2021, 27(2): 73-78. LEI Zhen, SUN Pengchang, LU Wenbo, et al. Optimization of blasting parameters for trench excavation shaping[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2021, 27(2): 73-78.
[5] 申秦勇. 高铁隧道中心深埋水沟沟槽爆破技术[C] //张可文. 2021年全国工程建设行业施工技术交流会论文集(下册). 北京:《施工技术》杂志社, 亚太建设科技信息研究院有限公司, 2021: 1795-1796. SHEN Qinyong. Application of deep buried gully and groove blasting technique in center of high railway tunnel[C] //ZHANG Kewen.Proceedings of the 2021 National Construction Technology Exchange Conference for the Engineering Construction Industry(Lower Volume). Beijing: Construction Technology Magazine, Asia-Pacific Construction Science and Technology Information Research Institute Limited, 2021: 1795-1796.
[6] 刘刚. 隧道硬质水平岩层中心沟槽预裂爆破开挖技术[C] //中国工程爆破协会, 中国力学学会. 中国爆破新技术Ⅲ. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2012: 255-261. LIU Gang. Presplitting blasting excavation technology of hard rock tunnel center groove[C] //China Engineering Blasting Association, China Mechanics Society. China Blasting New Technology Ⅲ. Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press, 2012: 255-261.
[7] 梁志荣, 李建科, 谭士帅, 等. 胶结戈壁砂石中的管沟开挖爆破[J]. 爆破, 2006(3): 41-43. LIANG Zhirong, LI Jianke, TAN Shishuai, et al. The pipe excavation blasting in cement gobi sand[J]. Blasting, 2006(3): 41-43.
[8] 司士营. 锯齿形爆破网路在沟槽开挖中的应用[J]. 安徽建筑, 2013, 6: 106. SI Shiying. Sawtooth blasting network in the application of channel excavation[J]. Anhui Construction, 2013, 6: 106.
[9] 王维.逐孔爆破在沟槽开挖中的应用[J]. 现代矿业, 2009, 12(12): 73-75. WANG Wei. Application of hole-by-hole blasting in trench excavation[J]. Modern Mining, 2009, 12(12): 73-75.
[10] 杨军伟, 池恩安, 赵明生. 复杂环境下大孔径沟槽爆破技术的应用[J]. 现代矿业, 2013, 10(534): 171-172. YANG Junwei, CHI En'an, ZHAO Mingsheng. Application of large aperture trench blasting technology in complex environment[J]. Modern Mining, 2013, 10(534): 171-172.
[11] 师文强, 王思杰, 杜文秀, 等. 基于SPH-FEM耦合算法的台阶精准爆破延期时间研究及应用[J]. 金属矿山, 2024(5): 210-219. SHI Wenqiang, WANG Sijie, DU Wenxiu, et al. Study on bench precision blasting delay time based on SPH-FEM coupling algorithm and its field application[J]. Metal Mining, 2024(5): 210-219.
[12] 陶子豪, 李祥龙, 胡启文, 等. 掏槽爆破成腔空孔效应数值模拟研究与分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2024: 1-13. TAO Zihao, LI Xianglong, HU Qiwen, et al. Study and analysis on numerical simulation of cavity effect of cut blasting[J]. Journal of Military Engineering, 2024: 1-13.
[13] 胡英国, 卢文波, 陈明, 等. SPH-FEM耦合爆破损伤分析方法的实现与验证[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(增刊1): 2740-2748. HU Yingguo, LU Wenbo, CHEN Ming, et al. Implementation and verification of SPH-FEM coupling blasting damage analytical method[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(Suppl.1): 2740-2748.
[14] 冷振东, 卢文波, 胡浩然, 等. 爆生自由面对边坡微差爆破诱发振动峰值的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(9): 1815-1822. LENG Zhendong, LU Wenbo, HU Haoran, et al. Studies on influence of blast-created free face on ground vibration in slope blasts with millisecond-delays[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(9): 1815-1822.
[15] 徐成光. 复杂环境和复杂地质条件下的沟槽控制爆破[J]. 工程爆破, 1996, 2(1): 47-51. XU Chengguang. Controlled blasting with ditch in complicated environment and geology[J]. Engineering Blasting, 1996, 2(1): 47-51.
[16] 高文学, 金乾坤, 杨军, 等. 沟槽深孔微差爆破的工程实践和数值模拟[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1999(2): 69-73. GAO Wenxue, JIN Qiankun, YANG Jun, et al. Engineering practice and numerical simulation on the millisecond blasting for ditching deep bore-holes[J]. Explosion and Shock, 1999(2): 69-73.
[17] 梅锦煜, 郑道明, 郑桂斌, 等. 水利水电工程施工技术全书 第二卷 土石方工程 第一册 爆破技术[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2017: 102-107.
[18] 马瑞志. 基于SPH-FEM算法的流固耦合仿真[D]. 郑州:华北水利水电大学, 2019. MA Ruizhi. Fluid-solid coupling simulation based on SPH-FEM[D]. Zhengzhou:North China University of Water Resources and Hydropower, 2019.
[19] ZHANG H, LI T C, DU Y T, et al. Theoretical and numerical investigation of deep-hole cut blasting based on cavity cutting and fragment throwing[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 111: 103854.
[20] 程兵, 汪海波, 汪泉, 等. SPH-FEM耦合法数值模拟在工程爆破教学中的应用研究[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2023, 40(10): 100-105. CHENG Bing, WANG Haibo, WANG Quan, et al. Research on the application of SPH-FEM coupling algorithm numerical simulation in engineering blasting teaching[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2023, 40(10): 100-105.
[21] 凌天龙, 吴帅峰, 刘殿书, 等. 砂岩Holmquist-Johnson-Cook模型参数确定[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(8): 2211-2216. LING Tianlong, WU Shuaifeng, LIU Dianshu, et al. Determination of Holmquist-Johnson-Cook model parameters for sandstone[J]. Journal of Coal, 2018, 43(8): 2211-2216.
[22] 郑淞午. 循环爆破作用下围岩的累积损伤规律研究[J]. 山西建筑, 2025, 51(4): 96-99. ZHENG Songwu. Study on the law of cumulative damage of surrounding rock induced by successive blasting[J]. Shanxi Construction, 2025, 51(4): 96-99.
[23] 刘运通, 高文学. 爆炸荷载下岩石损伤的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2001(6): 789-792. LIU Yuntong, GAO Wenxue. Numerical simulations on rock damage under explosion loading[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2001(6): 789-792.
[24] LI C X, YANG R S, WANG Y B, et al. Theory and numerical simulation of deep hole cut blasting based on dispersed charge and staged detonation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2023, 169: 105453.
[25] 胡浩然, 周海孝, 张玉柱, 等. 大型船闸开挖预裂爆破累积损伤特性及隔振效果分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2023(1): 104-111. HU Haoran, ZHOU Haixiao, ZHANG Yuzhu, et al. Analysis of damage accumulating characteristics and vibration isolating effect of presplitting blasting in excavation of large-scale navigation lock[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Transportation Engineering, 2023(1): 104-111.
[26] 黄新南. 大孔径爆破技术在沟槽开挖中的应用[J]. 工程爆破, 2011, 17(3): 44-46. HUANG Xinnan. Application of large aperture blasting technique in excavating groove[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2011, 17(3): 44-46.
[27] 陈一曦, 钟明寿, 刘影, 等. 平行掏槽孔内延时爆破技术的SPH-FEM数值模拟[J]. 工程爆破, 2023, 29(3): 55-62. CHEN Yixi, ZHONG Mingshou, LIU Ying, et al. Numerical simulation on delayed blasting technology in parallel cut hole based on SPH-FEM[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2023, 29(3): 55-62.
[1] 丁建奇, 王陈成, 朱向闪, 张翔, 傅刚, 徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
[2] 纪禄凌,游玮,李晓逸,曾原驰,刘毓氚,张铠. 增设压力阀对隧道防排水影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 92-102.
[3] 杨立,夏增选,娄文杰,刘杉,李奉庭,武科. 山区深埋公路隧道穿越断层破碎带施工稳定性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 32-42.
[4] 黄震,叶张骞,张嘉伟,彭子茂,严展硕. 膨胀型防火涂料对装配式框架隧道耐火性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 46-58.
[5] 韩兴博, 陈子明, 苏恩杰, 梁晓明, 宋桂峰, 叶飞. 盾构隧道围岩压力分布规律及作用模式[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 34-43.
[6] 房倩, 杜建明, 王赶, 杨晓旭. 模型边界对圆形隧道开挖引起地表沉降的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 10-17.
[7] 张姣龙, 高一民, 张建, 周浩, 潘野, 柯磊, 柳献. 一种模拟盾构刀盘破岩过程的模型试验设计原理和方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 20-28.
[8] 郭新新, 朱安龙, 王万平, 汪波, 王智佼, 王振宇. 高应力炭质板岩隧道大变形特征及其机理分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 29-39.
[9] 王纪伟, 张连震, 张庆松, 杨旆, 陈新, 王建辉, 韩子川, 王洪超, 孙子正, 屠文锋. 富水裂隙岩体注浆材料适用性现场试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(1): 58-67.
[10] 刘立鹏,王彦兵,宋倩. 水工有压隧洞衬砌启裂水头及围岩联合承载影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 52-58.
[11] 李鹏飞, 刘宏翔, 赵勇, 刘建友, 王帆. 隧道穿越断层破碎带防突水最小安全厚度及其影响因素[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 77-84.
[12] 叶飞, 王坚, 田崇明, 何彪, 赵猛, 韩兴博, 李永健. 隧道排水管结晶堵塞病害研究现状与防治技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 13-22.
[13] 李利平,贺鹏,石少帅,刘洪亮,胡杰,秦承帅. 隧道施工过程巨石垮塌研究现状、问题与对策研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 22-31.
[14] 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 黄世武, 杨磊. 富水风化花岗岩隧道突水突泥灾害防治技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 32-38.
[15] 王焕. 大直径泥水盾构穿越无加固条件沉降敏感带扰动控制技术研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(2): 107-113.
[1] QIAN Qihu. Scientific use of the urban underground space to construction the harmonious livable and beautiful city[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 1 -7 .
[2] ZHOU Caigui, LI Jing, LIANG Qingguo, CHEN Kelin. Comparison of water inflow prediction methods of hydraulic diversion tunnels during construction[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 32 -44 .
[3] SONG Changqing, FANG Xiaozheng , XIE Jian. Traffic noise data quality control method and its application in surface wave exploration[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -10 .
[4] HUANG Zheng, YE Zhangqian, ZHANG Jiawei, PENG Zimao, YAN Zhanshuo. The influence of intumescent fire retardant coating on the fire resistance of assembled frame tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -16 .
[5] ZHANG Ning, HUANG Xinjie, WANG Chuan, XU Bin, ZHANG Jiancheng, ZHANG Bo. Experimental and numerical simulation of high-pressure water jet cutting concrete[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 47 -56 .
[6] WANG Lichuan , HE Weiguo, ZHANG Junru , WU Hongbin , JIANG Xinqiang , ZHANG Huijian , WANG Wen , HUANG Linxiang. Application of the steel pipe pile arch cover method in large-span underground metro stations in weak and fragmented rock strata[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -14 .
[7] . [J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2): 124 -127 .
[8] WANG Qiuzhe, HAN Rui, BAI Xiaoxiao, ZHAO Kai. Seismic stability of immersed tunnel under locked backfill[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 71 -77 .
[9] HAO Junsuo, LIU Junfeng, LIU Hao, ZHAO Mingfan. Inducement and prevention technology of secondary disasters of water and mud inrush in tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 81 -92 .
[10] DONG Longjun, WANG Junhui, MA Ju. Response and support suggestions of surrounding rock of underground cavern under different microseismic source mechanism[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(3): 68 -76 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn