Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2024, Vol. 6 Issue (3): 92-102    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2024.03.10
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
增设压力阀对隧道防排水影响
纪禄凌1,2,游玮1,李晓逸1,曾原驰2,刘毓氚2*,张铠3
1. 厦门路桥建设集团工程有限公司, 福建 厦门 361026;2. 福州大学土木工程学院, 福建 福州 350108;3. 厦门捷航工程技术有限公司, 福建 厦门 361006
Influence of incorporating valve pressure on the tunnel waterproof and drainage
JI Luling1,2, YOU Wei1, LI Xiaoyi1, ZENG Yuanchi2, LIU Yuchuan2*, ZHANG Kai3
1. Xiamen Road &
Bridge Construction Group Engineering Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361026, Fujian, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China;
3. Xiamen Jiehang Engineering Testing Technology Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361006, Fujian, China
下载:  PDF (10451KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对隧道主动控制式防排水系统难以实现对排水量和水压的动态控制、易造成隧道开裂渗漏的问题,提出在环向排水盲管处增设压力阀,控制排水量和外水压力,并推导隧道排水量的计算公式。基于稳定渗流场基本微分方程,运用保角变换方法推导围岩渗流场公式,建立包含环向排水盲管间距和泄水压力的隧道渗流计算模型,推导隧道排水量及二衬结构外水压力的计算公式。通过退化解和数值模拟方法,验证解析解的合理性。在此基础上,建立增设压力阀的隧道防排水设计方法。结果表明:土工织物渗透系数和排水管间距对水压和流量有很大影响,建议土工织物渗透系数不小于500 μm/s,排水盲管的间距可综合泄水压力进行设置。与现有主动控制式防排水系统相比,增设压力阀可以减少灌浆圈的厚度和施工成本。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
纪禄凌
游玮
李晓逸
曾原驰
刘毓氚
张铠
关键词:  隧道工程  隧道防排水系统  地下水压力  涌水量  解析解    
Abstract: The current active control waterproof and drainage system was difficult to achieve dynamic control of water inflows and pressure, which could lead to tunnel cracking and leakage, a pressure valve was installed at the circumferential drainage blind pipe in order to control the water inflow and water pressure. Additionally, the formula for calculating the tunnel water inflow was derived. Using the conformal transformation, the seepage field formula of the surrounding rock was derived from the basic differential equation of the stable seepage field. The tunnel seepage calculation model was further established, incorporating the parameters of circumferential drainage blind pipe spacing and discharge pressure.The calculation formula of tunnel drainage volume and external water pressure of the external water pressure of secondary lining and tunnel water inflow calculation formula was obtained.The decomposition and numerical simulation techniques confirmed the analytical solution's reasonableness.This served as the foundation for the establishment of a tunnel drainage design solution with a pressure valve. The findings indicated that the water pressure and flow rate were significantly impacted by the geotextile permeability coefficient and the spacing between drainage pipes. It was recommended to select a geotextile which permeability coefficient of at least 500 μm/s, and the spacing between drainage blind pipes could be adjusted based on the drainage pressure. The grouting ring thickness could be decreased by adding a pressure valve in comparison to the current active control waterproof and drainage.
Key words:  tunnel engineering    tunnel drainage system    groundwater pressure    water inflow    analytical solutionReceived:2024-02-19    Revised:2024-03-29    Accepted:2024-04-03    Published:2024-09-20
发布日期:  2024-09-20     
中图分类号:  U453.6  
基金资助: 福建省自然科学基金青年创新资助项目(2022J05190);福建省交通运输厅科技资助项目(201804)
作者简介:  纪禄凌(1997— ),男,福建厦门人,助理工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为隧道工程. E-mail:690426017@qq.com. *通信作者简介:刘毓氚(1971— ),男,福建龙岩人,教授,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道工程. E-mail: liuyuchuan@fzu.edu.cn
引用本文:    
纪禄凌,游玮,李晓逸,曾原驰,刘毓氚,张铠. 增设压力阀对隧道防排水影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 92-102.
JI Luling, YOU Wei, LI Xiaoyi, ZENG Yuanchi, LIU Yuchuan, ZHANG Kai. Influence of incorporating valve pressure on the tunnel waterproof and drainage. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(3): 92-102.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2024/V6/I3/92
[1] 李鹏飞, 张顶立, 赵勇, 等. 海底隧道复合衬砌水压力分布规律及合理注浆加固圈参数研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(2): 280-288. LI Pengfei, ZHANG Dingli, ZHAO Yong, et al. Study of distribution law of water pressure acting on composite lining and reasonable parameters of grouting circle for subsea tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(2): 280-288.
[2] 应宏伟, 朱成伟, 龚晓南. 考虑注浆圈作用水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(6): 1018-1023. YING Hongwei, ZHU Chengwei, GONG Xiaonan. Analytic solution on seepage field of underwater tunnel considering grouting circle[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2016, 50(6): 1018-1023.
[3] CHENG P, ZHAO L H, LI Q, et al. Water inflow prediction and grouting design for tunnel considering nonlinear hydraulic conductivity[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23(9): 4132-4140.
[4] LIU J H, LI X J. Analytical solution for estimating groundwater inflow into lined tunnels considering waterproofing and drainage systems[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80(9): 6827-6839.
[5] 李晓军, 刘荆辉. 防排水系统对复合式衬砌渗透特性的影响及表征方法[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(7):995-1003. LI Xiaojun, LIU Jinghui. Effect of waterproof and drainage system on seepage properties of composite lining and its characterization method[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2021, 49(7):995-1003.
[6] 张明聚, 王思卿, 李鹏飞, 等. 考虑防排水系统的隧道渗流场解析[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2023, 43(增刊1): 46-53. ZHANG Mingju, WANG Siqing, LI Pengfei, et al. Analysis of seepage field in tunnel considering waterproof and drainage system[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2023, 43(Suppl.1): 46-53.
[7] SCHLEISS A J, MANSO P A. Design of pressure relief valves for protection of steel-lined pressure shafts and tunnels against buckling during emptying[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2012, 45(1): 11-20.
[8] HE B G, LI H, ZHANG X W, et al. A novel analytical method incorporating valve pressure for the controlled drainage of transport tunnels[J]. Tunnellingand Underground Space Technology, 2020, 106: 103637.
[9] 李道松. 富水地区山岳隧道设置压力阀新型防排水系统工程应用[J]. 福建交通科技, 2022(7): 38-41.
[10] LEI S Z. An analytical solution for steady flow into a ttonnel[J]. Groundwater, 1999, 37(1): 23-26.
[11] 傅鹤林, 安鹏涛, 成国文, 等. 断层与平行隧道空间位置关系对涌水量的影响研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(4): 1032-1040. FU Helin, AN Pengtao, CHENG Guowen, et al. Research on the influence of the spatial position relationship between faults and parallel tunnels on water inflow[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering,2022, 19(4): 1032-1040.
[12] 王毅才. 隧道工程[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2006.
[13] 张祉道. 隧道涌水量及水压计算公式半理论推导及防排水应用建议[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2006, 43(1): 1-6. ZHANG Zhidao. Semi-theoretical derivation for the formulas of water inflow and water pressure acting on a tunnel and their application to the waterproofing and drainage of tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2006, 43(1): 1-6.
[14] 王建宇. 再谈隧道衬砌水压力[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(3): 5-10. WANG Jianyu. Once more on hydraulic pressure upon lining[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2003, 40(3): 5-10.
[15] 潘以恒, 罗其奇, 周斌, 等. 半无限平面含注浆圈深埋隧道渗流场解析研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(6): 1114-1122. PAN Yiheng, LUO Qiqi, ZHOU Bin, et al. Analytical study on seepage field of deep tunnel with grouting circle in half plane[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2018, 52(6): 1114-1122.
[16] ZHAO D P, FAN H B, JIA L L, et al. Research on waterproofing and drainage optimization scheme for Karst tunnel lining in water-rich areas[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2021, 80(4): 150.
[17] 王志杰, 何晟亚, 王国栋, 等. 轴对称解析解对马蹄形隧道衬砌水压力及渗透量适用性研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2016, 49(1): 54-59. WANG Zhijie, HE Shengya, WANG Guodong, et al. Study of applicability of an axisymmetric solution for water pressure and seepage flow on lining of horseshoe shaped tunnel[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2016, 49(1): 54-59.
[18] 杨武策, 彭兴彬, 王亚琼, 等. 公路隧道新型防排水分区方法研究[J]. 公路, 2020, 65(9): 328-333. YANG Wuce, PENG Xingbin, WANG Yaqiong, et al. Investigation on the new zoning method for waterproof and drainage of highway tunnel[J]. Highway, 2020, 65(9): 328-333.
[19] 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司. 公路隧道设计规范 第一册 土建工程:JTG3370.1—2018[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2019.
[1] 杨立,夏增选,娄文杰,刘杉,李奉庭,武科. 山区深埋公路隧道穿越断层破碎带施工稳定性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 32-42.
[2] 黄震,叶张骞,张嘉伟,彭子茂,严展硕. 膨胀型防火涂料对装配式框架隧道耐火性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 46-58.
[3] 周彩贵, 李景, 梁庆国, 陈克霖. 水工引水隧洞施工涌水量预测方法对比[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 32-44.
[4] 韩兴博, 陈子明, 苏恩杰, 梁晓明, 宋桂峰, 叶飞. 盾构隧道围岩压力分布规律及作用模式[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 34-43.
[5] 张中杰, 李心熙, 吴航, 陈加核, 禹海涛. 季节性冻土环境下有轨电车运营期轨道动力响应[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 48-54.
[6] 房倩, 杜建明, 王赶, 杨晓旭. 模型边界对圆形隧道开挖引起地表沉降的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 10-17.
[7] 张姣龙, 高一民, 张建, 周浩, 潘野, 柯磊, 柳献. 一种模拟盾构刀盘破岩过程的模型试验设计原理和方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 20-28.
[8] 郭新新, 朱安龙, 王万平, 汪波, 王智佼, 王振宇. 高应力炭质板岩隧道大变形特征及其机理分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 29-39.
[9] 王纪伟, 张连震, 张庆松, 杨旆, 陈新, 王建辉, 韩子川, 王洪超, 孙子正, 屠文锋. 富水裂隙岩体注浆材料适用性现场试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(1): 58-67.
[10] 刘立鹏,王彦兵,宋倩. 水工有压隧洞衬砌启裂水头及围岩联合承载影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 52-58.
[11] 李鹏飞, 刘宏翔, 赵勇, 刘建友, 王帆. 隧道穿越断层破碎带防突水最小安全厚度及其影响因素[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 77-84.
[12] 叶飞, 王坚, 田崇明, 何彪, 赵猛, 韩兴博, 李永健. 隧道排水管结晶堵塞病害研究现状与防治技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 13-22.
[13] 贺翀,金芸芸. 悬挂式降水基坑涌水量的源汇计算方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(1): 91-96.
[14] 禹海涛, 王祺, 刘涛. 均质地层长隧道纵向地震响应解析解[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(1): 34-41.
[15] 李利平,贺鹏,石少帅,刘洪亮,胡杰,秦承帅. 隧道施工过程巨石垮塌研究现状、问题与对策研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 22-31.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn