Seismic performance of large shield tunnel considering internal structure
WANG Wei1, LIU Ying1, ZHUANG Haiyang1,2*, ZHAO Kai1, CHEN Guoxing1
1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, Jiangsu, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China
Abstract: Taking the GIL shield tunnel integrated corridor as an example, the non-linear soil-tunnel structure with and without the π-shaped bracket structure was established as a three-dimensional finite element analysis model for static and dynamic coupling, and the effect of the π-shaped bracket structure on the overall seismic performance of the shield tunnel considering staggered assembly was investigated. The results showed that the tube sheet tension at the bottom of the tunnel was significantly reduced by up to 60% after the π-shaped bracket structure was placed, and the tube sheet tension near the capping block tended to increase under large earthquakes. The acceleration response spectra at the top and bottom of the tunnel and at the π-frame structure-tunnel connection did not change significantly when the input ground shaking peak was small; as the input ground shaking peak increases, the response spectra fluctuate significantly within short periods and the overall response spectra values decreased. On the whole, the tensile damage to the concrete at the top of the tunnel structure was aggravated, while the tensile damage at the bottom was relatively light, and the tensile damage was mainly distributed at and around the tube joints. It was necessary to consider the effect of the tunnel-π-shaped support structure dynamic interaction in the seismic design of large diameter shield tunnels.
[1] 禹海涛, 吴胤翔, 涂新斌, 等. 盾构隧道纵向地震响应的多尺度分析方法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(1):138-144. YU Haitao, WU Yinxiang, TU Xinbin, et al. Multi-scale method for longitudinal seismic response analysis of shield tunnels[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(1):138-144. [2] 孙文昊, 封坤, 肖明清, 等. 双层隧道内部结构对隧道纵向力学性能的影响[J]. 铁道建筑, 2021, 61(5):43-48. SUN Wenhao, FENG Kun, XIAO Mingqing, et al. Influence of internal structure of double deck tunnel on longitudinal mechanical properties of tunnel[J]. Railway Engineering, 2021, 61(5):43-48. [3] 崔佳, 张力, 郭文琦. 盾构隧道装配式内部结构形式及其对管片受力的影响[J]. 建筑技术开发, 2021, 48(15):96-98. CUI Jia, ZHANG Li, GUO Wenqi. Assembled internal structure of shield tunnel and its influence on force of segment[J]. Building Technology Development, 2021, 48(15):96-98. [4] 王程, 汤鹏, 庄海洋, 等. 考虑错缝拼装的过江大直径管廊盾构隧道抗震性能研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2021, 30(1):116-123. WANG Cheng, TANG Peng, ZHUANG Haiyang, et al. Seismic performance of large shield tunnel under the Yangzi River with considering the staggered joints[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2021, 30(1):116-123. [5] 刘学增, 赖浩然, 桑运龙, 等. 双侧卸载工况下盾构隧道错缝拼装结构变形特征[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(10):1398-1405. LIU Xuezeng, LAI Haoran, SANG Yunlong, et al. Deformation characteristics of shield tunnel with staggered joints under bilateral unloading condition[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2019, 47(10):1398-1405. [6] 庄海洋, 任佳伟, 王瑞, 等. 两层三跨框架式地铁地下车站结构弹塑性工作状态与抗震性能水平研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(1):131-138. ZHUANG Haiyang, REN Jiawei, WANG Rui, et al. Elasto-plastic working states and seismic performance levels of frame-type subway underground station with two layers and three spans[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(1):131-138. [7] 付继赛, 庄海洋, 王旭, 等. 地下连续墙连接方式对地铁车站结构地震反应的影响研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2018, 27(6):42-50. FU Jisai, ZHUANG Haiyang, WANG Xu, et al. Influence of diaphragm wall connection mode on earthquake response of subway station structure[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2018, 27(6):42-50. [8] INSTITUTION B S. Codeof practice for temporary works procedures and the permissible stress design of falsework: BS 5975-2008+A1-2011[S]. [S.l.] : British Standards Institution, 2011. [9] 庄海洋, 陈国兴, 朱定华. 土体动力粘塑性记忆型嵌套面本构模型及其验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(10):1267-1272. ZHUANG Haiyang, CHEN Guoxing, ZHU Dinghua. Dynamic visco-plastic memorial nested yield surface model of soil and its verification[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(10):1267-1272. [10] LEE J H, FENVES G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8):892-900. [11] MALVAR L J, CRAWFORD J E, WESEVICH J W, et al. A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 19(9/10):847-873. [12] ZHUANG H Y, HU Z H, WANG X J, et al. Seismic responses of a large underground structure in liquefied soils by FEM numerical modelling[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13(12):3645-3668. [13] 楼梦麟, 王文剑, 朱彤, 等. 土-结构体系振动台模型试验中土层边界影响问题[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(4):30-36. LOU Menglin, WANG Wenjian, ZHU Tong, et al. Soil lateral boundary effect in shaking fable model test of soil-structure system[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2000, 20(4):30-36. [14] ZHUANG H Y, REN J W, MIAO Y, et al. Seismic performance levels of a large underground subway station in different soil foundations[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 25(12/14):2808-2833.
2023, Vol. 5 
