Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (1): 13-21    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.01.02
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于裂缝形状与特征的衬砌结构开裂截面稳定性评估
陈志敏,师浩博*,张润龙,黎俊鸿,路帅,谈成龙
兰州交通大学土木工程学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070
Stability evaluation of cracked section of lining structure based on crack shape and characteristics
CHEN Zhimin, SHI Haobo*, ZHANG Runlong, LI Junhong, LU Shuai, TAN Chenglong
School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
下载:  PDF (5196KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为精准评估隧道衬砌开裂截面安全状态、优化结构设计理论并科学确定维修时机,本研究结合断裂力学与极限承载力理论构建开裂截面稳定性评估体系,针对衬砌拱顶、拱腰、边墙三个关键部位,通过数值模拟系统计算不同裂缝深度下的安全系数,引入稳定系数P(判定裂缝是否稳定)和承载力安全系数K(评估截面承载能力是否满足要求)双重指标重点分析各因素对结构安全状态的影响机制。结果显示,衬砌开裂后稳定性主要受裂缝是否持续扩展、开裂导致截面厚度减小对承载力的削弱程度两大因素控制,且某一部位开裂对其他部位承载力安全系数影响极小,验证了局部裂缝评估的独立性,明确不同裂缝等级的临界深度与角度。研究为隧道衬砌裂缝安全评估提供了量化依据,对优化结构设计理论、科学确定维修时机具有重要参考价值。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈志敏
师浩博
张润龙
黎俊鸿
路帅
谈成龙
关键词:  隧道工程  衬砌裂缝  稳定性评估  截面承载力  断裂力学    
Abstract: To accurately evaluate the safety state of tunnel lining cracked sections, optimize structural design, and determine maintenance timing scientifically, a stability evaluation system was established in this study by integrating fracture mechanics with the ultimate bearing capacity theory. Numerical simulations were employed to systematically calculate the safety coefficients for three key lining parts—namely, the vault, haunch, and side wall—under varying crack depths. A dual-index system, comprising the stability coefficient P (indicating crack stability)and the bearing capacity safety coefficient K (assessing whether the sectional bearing capacity meets requirements), was introduced to analyze the influence mechanisms of various factors on structural safety. The results showed that the post cracking stability of the lining was primarily governed by two factors: first, whether the cracks continued to propagate, and second, the weakening of bearing capacity resulting from the reduction in effective section thickness due to cracking. Furthermore, cracking in one location was found to have a negligible impact on the bearing capacity safety coefficient of other locations, confirming the independence of local crack assessment. Critical crack depths and angles corresponding to different damage grades were also identified. This study provides a quantitative basis for the safety evaluation of tunnel lining cracks, offering valuable references for optimizing structural design theory and scientifically planning maintenance schedules.
Key words:  tunneling    lningcrack    evaluation of stability    section bearing capacity    crack mechanics
发布日期:  2026-03-23     
中图分类号:  U45  
  TU93  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(12262018);甘肃省建设科技研究资助项目(JK2018-33)
作者简介:  陈志敏(1979— ),男,河北邢台人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为岩土与隧道工程. E-mail:czm@mail.lzjtu.cn. *通信作者简介:师浩博(2000— ),男,河北张家口人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为岩土与隧道工程. E-mail:1187168042@qq.com
引用本文:    
陈志敏, 师浩博, 张润龙, 黎俊鸿, 路帅, 谈成龙. 基于裂缝形状与特征的衬砌结构开裂截面稳定性评估[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 13-21.
CHEN Zhimin, SHI Haobo, ZHANG Runlong, LI Junhong, LU Shuai, TAN Chenglong. Stability evaluation of cracked section of lining structure based on crack shape and characteristics. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(1): 13-21.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I1/13
[1] MEGUID M A, DANG H K. The effect of erosion voids on existing tunnel linings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(3): 278-286.
[2] 罗建春, 高菊如. 既有线铁路隧道病害分级方法与评价体系研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2016, 53(6): 12-17. LUO Jianchun, GAO Juru. A defect classification and evaluation system for existing railway tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2016, 53(6): 12-17.
[3] XU Z L, CHEN J X, LUO Y B, et al. Geomechanical model test for mechanical properties and cracking features of large-section tunnel lining under periodic temperature[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 123: 104319.
[4] LIU H, LIU J C. Brief introduction to the collection and identification methods of tunnel lining cracks [J]. International Core Journal of Engineering, 2024, 10(2): 193-201.
[5] HAMIDIA M, AFZALI M, JAMSHIDIAN S, et al. Post-earthquake stiffness loss estimation for reinforced concrete columns using fractal analysis of crack patterns[J]. Structural Concrete, 2023, 24(3): 3933-3951.
[6] XIAO J Z, DAI F C, WEI Y Q, et al. Cracking mechanism of secondary lining for a shallow and asymmetrically-loaded tunnel in loose deposits[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 43: 232-240.
[7] LIU Y Y, LAI H P, XIE Y L, et al. Cracks analysis of highway tunnel lining in flooded loess[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 170(1): 62-72.
[8] XU G W, HE C, CHEN Z Q, et al. Mechanical behavior of secondary tunnel lining with longitudinal crack[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 113: 104543.
[9] CHIAIA B, FANTILLI A P, VALLINI P. Evaluation of crack width in FRC structures and application to tunnel linings[J]. Materials and Structures, 2009, 42(3): 339-351.
[10] 谭社会, 李再帏, 时瑾, 等. 线路纵断面设置对千米级高铁悬索桥动力学行为的影响[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2021, 42(6): 58-67. TAN Shehui, LI Zaiwei, SHI Jin, et al. Influence of track profile setting on dynamic behavior of high-speed railway suspension bridge with kilometer span[J]. China Railway Science, 2021, 42(6): 58-67.
[11] 余龙文. 层状围岩流变荷载作用下隧道二次衬砌裂损特征[J]. 铁道建筑, 2021, 61(12): 127-132. YU Longwen. Crack characteristics of tunnel secondary lining under rheological load of layered surrounding rock[J]. Railway Engineering, 2021, 61(12): 127-132.
[12] MEGUID M A, DANG H K. The effect of erosion voids on existing tunnel linings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(3): 278-286.
[13] LEE D H, LEE H K, KIM Y G. A study on mechanical behavior and cracking characteristics of tunnel lining by model experiment[J]. Geosystem Engineering, 2002, 5(4): 104-112.
[14] BRIFFAUT M, BENBOUDJEMA F, D'ALOIA L. Effect of fibres on early age cracking of concrete tunnel lining(part II: numerical simulations)[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 59: 221-229.
[15] WANG Z, MAEKAWA K. Lifetime assessment of structural concrete-multi-scale integrated hygro-thermal-chemo-electrical-mechanistic approach and statistical evaluation[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2022, 18(7): 933-949.
[16] 王大鹏. 既有铁路隧道衬砌开裂力学行为及服役可靠性[D]. 石家庄:石家庄铁道大学, 2024: 67-76. WANG Dapeng. Mechanical behavior and service reliability of existing railway tunnel lining cracks [D]. Shijiazhuang:Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, 2024: 67-76.
[17] 郭德平, 刘语泉, 黄兴. 变截面隧道施工方式与支护结构参数敏感性分析[J]. 路基工程, 2025(3): 175-181. GUO Deping, LIU Yuquan, HUANG Xing. Analysis on sensitivity of construction mode and supporting structure parameters of variable cross-section tunnel[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2025(3): 175-181.
[18] BURATTI N, FERRACUTI B, SAVOIA M. Concrete crack reduction in tunnel linings by steel fibre-reinforced concretes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 44: 249-259.
[19] LIU D J, HUANG H W, YUE Q R, et al. Behaviour of tunnel lining strengthened by textile-reinforced concrete[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2016, 12(8): 964-976.
[20] WANG Y F, JIN J, WAN Z Y, et al. Crack characteristics and safety prediction for the lining of a typical tunnel located in a seismic area[J]. Mechanics of Solids, 2021, 56(6): 1103-1113.
[21] KUMAR A, CHAUHAN V B. Numerical investigation and design recommendations for steel linings in single and multiple tunnels under surcharge loading[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2025, 43(8): 457.
[22] RAEISI R, REZAIE F, ALIHA M R M. Mixed mode Ⅰ/Ⅱ and Ⅰ/Ⅲ fracture toughness investigation for preplaced aggregate concrete mixtures: experimental study and theoretical prediction[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2024, 47(8): 2873-2887.
[23] 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司. 铁路隧道设计规范: TB10003—2016[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社, 2016: 85-90.
[24] 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司. 公路隧道设计规范: JTG 3370.1—2018[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2018: 102-110.
[1] 张海兰, 吴云鹏, 邹仁, 马晓龙, 李坤泰, 高启栋, 牛磊, 周海孝. 基于SPH-FEM耦合模拟的隧道深埋排水沟爆破技术优化研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 93-104.
[2] 丁建奇, 王陈成, 朱向闪, 张翔, 傅刚, 徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
[3] 纪禄凌,游玮,李晓逸,曾原驰,刘毓氚,张铠. 增设压力阀对隧道防排水影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 92-102.
[4] 杨立,夏增选,娄文杰,刘杉,李奉庭,武科. 山区深埋公路隧道穿越断层破碎带施工稳定性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 32-42.
[5] 黄震,叶张骞,张嘉伟,彭子茂,严展硕. 膨胀型防火涂料对装配式框架隧道耐火性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 46-58.
[6] 韩兴博, 陈子明, 苏恩杰, 梁晓明, 宋桂峰, 叶飞. 盾构隧道围岩压力分布规律及作用模式[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 34-43.
[7] 房倩, 杜建明, 王赶, 杨晓旭. 模型边界对圆形隧道开挖引起地表沉降的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 10-17.
[8] 张姣龙, 高一民, 张建, 周浩, 潘野, 柯磊, 柳献. 一种模拟盾构刀盘破岩过程的模型试验设计原理和方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 20-28.
[9] 郭新新, 朱安龙, 王万平, 汪波, 王智佼, 王振宇. 高应力炭质板岩隧道大变形特征及其机理分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 29-39.
[10] 王纪伟, 张连震, 张庆松, 杨旆, 陈新, 王建辉, 韩子川, 王洪超, 孙子正, 屠文锋. 富水裂隙岩体注浆材料适用性现场试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(1): 58-67.
[11] 刘立鹏,王彦兵,宋倩. 水工有压隧洞衬砌启裂水头及围岩联合承载影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 52-58.
[12] 李鹏飞, 刘宏翔, 赵勇, 刘建友, 王帆. 隧道穿越断层破碎带防突水最小安全厚度及其影响因素[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 77-84.
[13] 叶飞, 王坚, 田崇明, 何彪, 赵猛, 韩兴博, 李永健. 隧道排水管结晶堵塞病害研究现状与防治技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 13-22.
[14] 李利平,贺鹏,石少帅,刘洪亮,胡杰,秦承帅. 隧道施工过程巨石垮塌研究现状、问题与对策研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 22-31.
[15] 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 黄世武, 杨磊. 富水风化花岗岩隧道突水突泥灾害防治技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(3): 32-38.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn