Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (3): 66-75    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.03.07
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
盾构隧道疏散通道临界防烟风速计算模型研究
罗驰恒1,郭元俊2,贾瑶2,姜学鹏2*
1.中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430063;2.武汉科技大学资源与环境工程学院, 湖北 武汉 430081
Research on calculation model of critical smoke control velocity for evacuation passages in shield tunnels
Luo Chiheng1, Guo Yuanjun2, Jia Yao2, Jiang Xuepeng2*
1. China Railway Siyuan Survey And Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China;
2. School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, China
下载:  PDF (10478KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为解决盾构隧道行车道下方安全疏散通道的临界防烟风速计算问题,本研究建立基于Froude数的理论计算模型,并结合火灾动力学模拟器(fire dynamics simulator, FDS)数值模拟与缩尺寸试验进行验证。通过理论推导,构建包含隧道纵向风速、火源功率及隧道高度的临界防烟风速隐式控制方程。结果表明:临界防烟风速随隧道纵向风速增大而线性降低,随火源功率升高而线性递增,随隧道高度增加呈指数型衰减;确定了控制烟气侵入的临界Froude数为12;1∶10缩尺寸模型试验验证理论公式的准确性,计算值与实测值偏差≤0.05 m/s。研究成果可为盾构隧道安全疏散通道加压送风系统设计提供理论依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
罗驰恒
郭元俊
贾瑶
姜学鹏
关键词:  盾构隧道  疏散通道  临界防烟风速  Froude数  纵向通风  缩尺寸试验    
Abstract: To determine the critical smoke control velocity for safety evacuation passageways located beneath the carriageway of shield tunnels, a theoretical model based on the Froude number was developed and validated via FDS(fire dynamics simulator)numerical simulations and reduced-scale experiments. An implicit governing equation for the critical smoke control velocity was theoretically derived by considering the effects of longitudinal tunnel velocity, fire heat release rate, and tunnel height. The results showed that the critical smoke control velocity decreased linearly with increasing longitudinal tunnel velocity, increased linearly with increasing fire heat release rate, and decreased exponentially with increasing tunnel height. Meanwhile, a critical Froude number of 12 was identified as the threshold for preventing smoke ingress into the safety evacuation passageway. The proposed theoretical model was further validated in a 1∶10 reduced-scale experiment, and the maximum absolute deviation between the calculated and measured velocities did not exceed 0.05 m/s, demonstrating the satisfactory predictive accuracy of the model. The results can provide a theoretical basis for the design of pressurized ventilation systems and the determination of critical smoke control velocities in safety evacuation passageways of shield tunnels.
Key words:  shield tunnel    evacuation passage    critical smoke control velocity    Froude number    longitudinal ventilation    scale model experiment
发布日期:  2026-10-12     
中图分类号:  U458  
  X951  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52376130,52476127)
作者简介:  罗驰恒(1990— ),男,湖北天门人,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为隧道工程设计. E-mail:tjulch@163.com. *通信作者简介:姜学鹏(1976— ),男,山东青岛人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道及地下空间火灾动力学与火灾防治. E-mail:jxp5276@126.com
引用本文:    
罗驰恒,郭元俊,贾瑶,姜学鹏. 盾构隧道疏散通道临界防烟风速计算模型研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 66-75.
Luo Chiheng, Guo Yuanjun, Jia Yao, Jiang Xuepeng. Research on calculation model of critical smoke control velocity for evacuation passages in shield tunnels. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(3): 66-75.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I3/66
[1] Gao Yifan, Liu Zuwen, Guo Zhiguo, et al. Research on fire and smoke control in urban and underground confined spaces: advances, challenges, and prospects[J]. Smart Underground Engineering, 2026, 2(1): 33-54.
[2] Chu K K, Zhou D, Xu Z S, et al. Experimental investigation on the evacuation performance of pedestrians in an underwater shield tunnel with evacuation stairs in a fire scenario[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2025, 156: 106247.
[3] 陈玉远. 盾构隧道底部疏散通道加压送风系统现场测试及优化研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(2): 135-140. Chen Yuyuan. Study of testing and optimization of pressurized air supply system at bottom of shield tunnel evacuation gallery[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(2): 135-140.
[4] 王君, 倪天晓, 张新. 城市水下公路隧道火灾时人员安全疏散[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2012, 31(5): 477-480. Wang Jun, Ni Tianxiao, Zhang Xin. Safety evacuation from fire at urban underwater highway tunnel[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2012, 31(5): 477-480.
[5] Xie B C, Zhang S Q, Xu Z S, et al. Experimental study on vertical evacuation capacity of evacuation slide in road shield tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 97: 103250.
[6] 姜学鹏, 张剑高, 何超, 等. 铁路隧道横通道临界风速研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2017, 38(4): 55-61. Jiang Xuepeng, Zhang Jiangao, He Chao, et al. Study on critical wind velocity of cross passage in railway tunnel[J]. China Railway Science, 2017, 38(4): 55-61.
[7] 严磊. 双洞公路隧道火灾模式下横通道通风控制研究[D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2019: 53-78. YAN Lei. Study on ventilation control of cross passages under fire scenarios in twin-bore highway tunnels[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2019:53-78.
[8] 姚勇征, 宋恪斌, 史聪灵, 等. 纵向通风下T型分岔隧道火灾烟气蔓延特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10): 115-120. Yao Yongzheng, Song Kebin, Shi Congling, et al. Fire smoke spread characteristics of T-shaped bifurcated tunnel under longitudinal ventilation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(10): 115-120.
[9] Zhou Y L, Bi H Q, Wang H L, et al. Critical velocity in the transverse passages of a railway tunnel rescue station with semi-transverse ventilation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 92: 103064.
[10] 刘琪, 姜学鹏, 蔡崇庆, 等. 盾构隧道安全通道正压送风排烟的设计计算[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2013, 13(2): 179-182. Liu Qi, Jiang Xuepeng, Cai Chongqing, et al. On the principle of positive pressure air supply of safety channel in shield tunnel[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2013, 13(2): 179-182.
[11] 谢宝超, 楚坤坤, 赵家明, 等. 超长距离盾构隧道疏散通道加压送风系统研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2021, 17(11): 137-143. Xie Baochao, Chu Kunkun, Zhao Jiaming, et al. Study on pressurized air supply system for evacuation passage of super long distance shield tunnel[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2021, 17(11): 137-143.
[12] 张新, 徐志胜, 姜学鹏, 等. 水下公路隧道纵向疏散通道加压送风系统研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2012, 32(6): 665-671. Zhang Xin, Xu Zhisheng, Jiang Xuepeng, et al. Study on pressurization air supply system of longitudinal evacuation route in underwater highway tunnel[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2012, 32(6): 665-671.
[13] Kurioka H, Oka Y, Satoh H, et al. Fire properties in near field of square fire source with longitudinal ventilation in tunnels[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2003, 38(4): 319-340.
[14] Li Y Z, Lei B, Ingason H. Theoretical and experimental study of critical velocity for smoke control in a tunnel cross-passage[J]. Fire Technology, 2013, 49(2): 435-449.
[15] 吴望一. 流体力学: 上册[M]. 2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021: 145-161.
[16] Heskestad G, Delichatsios M A. Update: the initial convective flow in fire[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1989, 15(6): 471-475.
[17] Karlsson B, Quintiere J. Enclosure fire dynamics[M]. Boca Raton, US: CRC Press, 1999: 64-66.
[18] Gasser I, Kraft M. Modelling and simulation of fires in tunnel networks[J]. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3(4): 691-707.
[19] Byrne E, Georgieva K, Carvel R. Fires in Ducts: a review of the early research which underpins modern tunnel fire safety engineering[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 306-314.
[20] 姜学鹏, 张子迪, 陈玉远. 隧道单向大间距点式排烟设计方法研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(6): 2220-2229. Jiang Xuepeng, Zhang Zidi, Chen Yuyuan. Study on the design method of smoke extraction mode of one-way large-space point in tunnels[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2024, 24(6): 2220-2229.
[21] McGrattan K B, Baum H R, Rehm R G. Fire dynamics simulator: technical reference guide[R]. Gaithersburg, US: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2000: 8.
[22] 陈滔, 袁中原, 范毅腾. 隧道火灾自然通风最不利火源位置的研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(5): 633-635. Chen Tao, Yuan Zhongyuan, Fan Yiteng. Study on the worst fire location in tunnel with natural ventilation[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2019, 38(5): 633-635.
[23] 王方超, 张铎, 陈长坤, 等. 横通道通风对隧道火灾烟气蔓延影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023, 19(3): 108-114. Wang Fangchao, Zhang Duo, Chen Changkun, et al. Numerical simulation study on influence of cross-passage ventilation on spread of tunnel fire smoke[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2023, 19(3): 108-114.
[24] Lanchava I, Javakhishvili G, Javakhishvili T, et al. Multifactorial dynamic model for analysis and evaluation of road tunnel fires[J]. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences, 2025, 19(4): 40-48.
[1] 孙文昊,许为民,何应道,历朋林,张锦程,张亮亮. 黄河中下游公铁合建盾构隧道设计关键技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 1-9.
[2] 赵世超,王剑宏,王超,鲁佳霖,杜昌言. 双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 23-30.
[3] 陈俊伟,施江杰,全良臣,张宇. 基于软硬件实时交互的大直径盾构隧道管片收敛变形监测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 45-55.
[4] 董瑞兴,李杨,张东,王利民,马千里,赵洪岩,董宏宇. 卵漂石地层盾构隧道漂石滞排对地表沉降影响试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 102-116.
[5] 马超, 乔法宇, 王国盛, 梁靖宇, 路德春. FRCM加固盾构隧道管片接头提升结构整体力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 22-31.
[6] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[7] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 于永堂, 朱才辉. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[8] 孙超, 张光伟, 答武强, 余祖峰. 临山条件下大直径盾构隧道抗浮控制技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 27-37.
[9] 赵泽乾, 朱旻, 包小华, 杨春山, 陈湘生. 下穿码头危化品堆场的超大直径盾构隧道抗爆性能评估方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 61-71.
[10] 范传刚,盛子琼,熊胜,栾蝶. 降雨与纵向通风作用下隧道火灾烟气蔓延及分层特性试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 37-45.
[11] 王宏超,胡军,周永强,付晓东. 二次衬砌施作时机对盾构隧道纵向力学性能的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 99-112.
[12] 闫治国, 王紫锐, 沈奕, 刘康. 碳氢曲线下大直径盾构隧道结构热力特性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 25-36.
[13] 孙齐昊, 舒计城, 范森, 柳献. 降水与回灌水抢险作用机制的试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 33-46.
[14] 王伟, 刘英, 庄海洋, 赵凯, 陈国兴. 考虑内部结构的大直径盾构隧道抗震性能[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 78-85.
[15] 加瑞, 杨岗, 郑刚. 盾构隧道施工历史对隧道地震响应的影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 41-51.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn