Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
二次衬砌施作时机对盾构隧道纵向力学性能的影响分析
王宏超1,胡军2,周永强2,3,付晓东2,3
(1.中铁二院工程集团有限公司,四川 成都 610031;2.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049)
The influence of secondary lining construction time on longitudinal mechanical properties of shield tunnel
WANG Hongchao1, HU Jun2, ZHOU Yongqiang2,3, FU Xiaodong2,3
(1.China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China;
3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
下载:  PDF (3193KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为解决盾构隧道因纵向不均匀变形引起的结构局部破坏和渗漏水等病害,对盾构隧道二次衬砌施作时机的影响规律及合理施作时机进行研究,建立双层衬砌盾构隧道三维纵向精细化数值模型,模拟管片螺栓力学特性和双层衬砌层间接触面交互特性,以施作二衬时管片衬砌变形程度作为二衬施作时机,通过隧道纵向等效抗弯刚度、纵向变形及结构受力情况分析二衬施作时机对双层衬砌盾构隧道纵向力学性能的影响。研究结果表明:二衬的施作能够有效提高结构抵抗纵向变形能力,减小管片衬砌纵向内力,且施作越早效果越明显。然而,过早施作二衬会导致二次衬砌承载较大,且不能充分发挥管片的承载能力,造成结构性能的浪费。结合双层衬砌结构纵向受力情况,引入合理程度作为判断标准,确定二衬合理施作时机为37.5%~62.5%。在此施作时机下,管片衬砌变形处于容许范围内,隧道结构可以同时满足工程经济性和结构可靠性的要求。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王宏超
胡军
周永强
付晓东
关键词:  盾构隧道  双层衬砌  精细化模型  二衬施作时机  纵向力学性能    
Abstract: To solve the problem of local damage and water seepage and leakage of lining structure caused by the longitudinal uneven deformation in shield tunnels, the influence law of construction time of the secondary lining and the reasonable construction time were researched in this paper. Based on this, a three-dimension longitudinal refined numerical model of double-layered lining shield tunnel was established, and the mechanical properties of the bolts and the interface between segment and secondary lining were realistically simulated. The deformation degree of segment lining when the secondary lining was constructed was used as the construction time of secondary lining, and the influence of the construction time of secondary lining on the longitudinal mechanical properties of double-layered lining shield tunnel was analyzed through the longitudinal equivalent flexural stiffness, longitudinal deformations and longitudinal internal forces of shield tunnel. The researches shown that the ability of shield tunnel structure to resist longitudinal deformation was improved and the longitudinal internal force of segment lining was reduced owing to the construction of secondary lining. The earlier the construction time, the better the effect. However, the secondary lining load-bearing became prominent and the load-bearing capacity of segment lining could not be utilized sufficiently when the secondary lining was constructed early, resulting in a waste of structural capacity. Considering the longitudinal internal force situation of the double-layered lining structure, the reasonable degree was introduced as the judgment criterion, and the reasonable construction time of secondary lining was determined to be 37.5%~62.5%. In this condition, the segment lining deformation was within the tolerance range, and the requirements of engineering economy and structural reliability of tunnel structure could be satisfied at the same time.
Key words:  shield tunnel    double-layer lining    refined numerical model    secondary lining construction time    longitudinal mechanical property
收稿日期:  2023-12-04      修回日期:  2024-02-07      发布日期:  2024-02-23     
中图分类号:  U451  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(52079135)
引用本文:    
王宏超, 胡军, 周永强, 付晓东. 二次衬砌施作时机对盾构隧道纵向力学性能的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
WANG Hongchao, HU Jun, ZHOU Yongqiang, FU Xiaodong. The influence of secondary lining construction time on longitudinal mechanical properties of shield tunnel. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-18.
链接本文:  
[1] 孙齐昊, 舒计城, 范森, 柳献. 降水与回灌水抢险作用机制的试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 33-46.
[2] 加瑞, 杨岗, 郑刚. 盾构隧道施工历史对隧道地震响应的影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 41-51.
[3] 王伟, 刘英, 庄海洋, 赵凯, 陈国兴. 考虑内部结构的大直径盾构隧道抗震性能[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 78-85.
[4] 宗军良, 饶倩, 王祺, 禹海涛. 地面出入式盾构隧道动力响应的数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 63-70.
[5] 魏纲, 徐天宝, 张治国. 复杂应力路径下波纹钢加固盾构隧道数值分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 24-32.
[6] 王智, 刘祥勇, 朱先发, 洪小星, 沈一鸣, 张冰利. 小曲率半径隧道施工对盾构管片结构影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 45-54.
[7] 韩兴博, 陈子明, 苏恩杰, 梁晓明, 宋桂峰, 叶飞. 盾构隧道围岩压力分布规律及作用模式[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 34-43.
[8] 喻伟, 林赞权, 朱彬彬, 汪元冶, 丁文其, 乔亚飞, 张晓东, 龚琛杰. 盾构隧道防水密封垫材料的高温老化后性能[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 52-58.
[9] 赵辰洋, 罗毛毛, 邱静怡, 倪芃芃, 赵锋烽. 盾构隧道施工引起地层变形预测方法综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 31-46.
[10] 潘秋景, 李晓宙, 黄杉, 汪来, 王树英, 方国光. 机器学习在盾构隧道智能施工中的应用——综述与展望[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 10-30.
[11] 张治国, 程志翔, 陈杰, 吴钟腾, 李云正. 盾构隧道接缝渗漏水诱发既有管线变形模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 77-91.
[12] 刘祥勇, 张鑫, 王军, 赵涛宁, 朱先发. 盾构施工对邻近建筑物群结构影响评价[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 99-106.
[13] 丁智, 李鑫家, 张霄. 基于机器学习的盾构掘进地表变形预测研究与展望[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 1-9.
[14] 吕玺琳, 赵庾成, 曾盛. 砂层中盾构隧道开挖面稳定性物理模型试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 67-76.
[15] 许有俊, 王智广, 张旭, 郭飞, 高胜雷, 杨昆. 小转弯半径盾构隧道施工引起的地层变形特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(2): 11-18.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn