断层破碎带隧道围岩变形及支护受力特征

摘要
相关文章
推荐阅读
Metrics

下载:

PDF (4722KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要针对断层破碎带隧道围岩易发生大变形的问题，以黑马关隧道穿越断层破碎带工程为研究背景，基于23个监测断面的围岩压力、拱顶沉降及水平收敛等现场监测数据，对围岩变形演化规律及支护结构受力特征进行了系统分析。结果表明断层破碎带段围岩变形显著，监测断面单侧最大水平收敛达787.7 mm，最大拱顶沉降达472.6 mm，表现出典型软岩大变形特征；围岩变形及压力在空间上具有明显离散性，拱顶沉降和水平收敛变异系数分别为83.2%和93.0%，反映出断层破碎带围岩结构高度非均质；施工阶段二次衬砌荷载分担比为5.18%～38.46%，平均为20.29%，表明围岩荷载主要由初期支护承担，二次衬砌承担约20%的荷载；在高地应力、顺层结构及地下水软化等多因素耦合作用下，围岩变形及支护受力呈现明显的空间非均匀性。研究成果可为类似断层破碎带隧道围岩大变形控制及支护设计提供参考。

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	（）
	作者相关文章
	魏健
	常伟学
	梁庆国
	祁亮斌
	李奇伟

关键词: 隧道工程断层破碎带围岩大变形监测分析

Abstract: To address the problem of large deformation of surrounding rock in tunnels crossing fault fracture zones, the Heimaguan Tunnel was taken as the engineering background. Based on the field monitoring data of surrounding rock pressure, crown settlement, and horizontal convergence obtained from 23 monitoring sections, the deformation evolution characteristics of the surrounding rock and the mechanical behavior of the supporting structures were systematically analyzed.The results showed that significant deformation occurred in the fault fracture zone section. The maximum unilateral horizontal convergence reached 787.7 mm, while the maximum crown settlement reached 472.6 mm, exhibiting typical characteristics of large deformation in fault fracture zones. The deformation and pressure of the surrounding rock exhibited significant spatial discreteness, with the coefficients of variation of crown settlement and horizontal convergence reaching 83.2% and 93.0%, respectively, indicating the highly heterogeneous nature of the surrounding rock within the fault fracture zone. During the construction stage, the load-sharing ratio of the secondary lining ranged from 5.18% to 38.46%, with an average 20.29%, indicating that the surrounding rock load was mainly borne by the primary support, while approximately 20% of the load was carried by the secondary lining. Under the coupled effects of high in-situ stress, bedding-controlled structure, and groundwater softening, the surrounding rock deformation and support stress exhibited pronounced spatial non-uniformity. The research results can be referred to for the control of large deformation and the support design of similar tunnels crossing fault fracture zones.

Key words: tunnel engineering fault fracture zone large deformation of surrounding rock monitoring analysis

收稿日期: 2026-03-09 修回日期: 2026-04-07 发布日期: 2026-05-26

中图分类号:	U43
	U45

基金资助: 甘肃路桥建设集团有限公司科研资助项目（2023-KLZCB-QT27）

通讯作者: 常伟学(1992—)，男，高级工程师，博士，主要研究方向为岩土与隧道工程施工技术管理。 E-mail: cwx1322@163.com

作者简介: 魏健(1986—)，男，甘肃张掖人，高级工程师，主要研究方向为隧道施工技术管理。E-mail：542488700@qq.com

引用本文:

魏健, 常伟学, 梁庆国, 祁亮斌, 李奇伟. 断层破碎带隧道围岩变形及支护受力特征[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
WEI Jian, CHANG Weixue, LIANG Qingguo, QI Liangbin, LI Qiwei. Deformation characteristics of surrounding rock and support stress in tunnels crossing fault fracture zones. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-14.

链接本文:

[1]	陈志敏, 师浩博, 张润龙, 黎俊鸿, 路帅, 谈成龙. 基于裂缝形状与特征的衬砌结构开裂截面稳定性评估[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 13-21.
[2]	张海兰, 吴云鹏, 邹仁, 马晓龙, 李坤泰, 高启栋, 牛磊, 周海孝. 基于SPH-FEM耦合模拟的隧道深埋排水沟爆破技术优化研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 93-104.
[3]	丁建奇, 王陈成, 朱向闪, 张翔, 傅刚, 徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
[4]	纪禄凌,游玮,李晓逸,曾原驰,刘毓氚,张铠. 增设压力阀对隧道防排水影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 92-102.
[5]	杨立,夏增选,娄文杰,刘杉,李奉庭,武科. 山区深埋公路隧道穿越断层破碎带施工稳定性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 32-42.
[6]	黄震,叶张骞,张嘉伟,彭子茂,严展硕. 膨胀型防火涂料对装配式框架隧道耐火性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 46-58.
[7]	孙文斌, 曹震博, 董法旭. 断层破碎带岩石裂隙渗透性的表征方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 1-7.
[8]	韩兴博, 陈子明, 苏恩杰, 梁晓明, 宋桂峰, 叶飞. 盾构隧道围岩压力分布规律及作用模式[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(4): 34-43.
[9]	房倩, 杜建明, 王赶, 杨晓旭. 模型边界对圆形隧道开挖引起地表沉降的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(1): 10-17.
[10]	张姣龙, 高一民, 张建, 周浩, 潘野, 柯磊, 柳献. 一种模拟盾构刀盘破岩过程的模型试验设计原理和方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 20-28.
[11]	郭新新, 朱安龙, 王万平, 汪波, 王智佼, 王振宇. 高应力炭质板岩隧道大变形特征及其机理分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(4): 29-39.
[12]	王纪伟, 张连震, 张庆松, 杨旆, 陈新, 王建辉, 韩子川, 王洪超, 孙子正, 屠文锋. 富水裂隙岩体注浆材料适用性现场试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2021, 3(1): 58-67.
[13]	魏纲,黄时雨,蒋丞武,虞兴福,王新泉. 上软下硬地层盾构工作井开挖受力与变形监测分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 29-36.
[14]	刘立鹏,王彦兵,宋倩. 水工有压隧洞衬砌启裂水头及围岩联合承载影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(4): 52-58.
[15]	李鹏飞, 刘宏翔, 赵勇, 刘建友, 王帆. 隧道穿越断层破碎带防突水最小安全厚度及其影响因素[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(3): 77-84.

[1]	SONG Changqing, FANG Xiaozheng , XIE Jian. Traffic noise data quality control method and its application in surface wave exploration[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -10 .
[2]	. [J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2): 124 -127 .
[3]	LIU Dewei. TBM tunnel surrounding rock excavability analysis based on excavation parameters and muck characteristics[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -9 .
[4]	FU Changbo, HONG Chenghua, WANG Zhechao, WANG Pengyu, LI Wei. Stability evaluation and faults influence analysis of water-sealed caverns during construction[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -11 .
[5]	WANG Jiacheng, ZHAO Zhihong, CHEN Jinfan, HE Jie, ZHOU Luming, TAN Xianfeng. Research on deep geothermal energy exploitation and storage system[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -13 .
[6]	TONG Yue, ZHU Ziyue, CHEN Junwu, ZHANG Dongming, ZHANG Wei. Mechanical behavior analysis of the construction process of a multi-arch tunnel without middle drift[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(1): 43 -58 .
[7]	TIAN Tao, TONG Yue, LI Zeyu, XU Jie, ZHOU Mingliang, JIN Wentao, HUANG Hongwei. Quantitative analysis of work face collapse risk in mountain highway tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -16 .
[8]	YUAN Mingdao, LIU Yijie, HUANG Bensheng, YANG Fengjie, ZHANG Xuhui. Calculation method of combined load-sharing ratio of deep-buried pressure pipelines[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(4): 21 -32 .
[9]	MA Jianjun, SHEN Kunyue, ZHENG Nan, HUANG Weizhen, XIAO Haihua. Blasting analysis of tunnel surrounding rock with weak interlayers based on JHB-4D-LSM[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(3): 47 -57 .
[10]	DAI Kailai, WANG Feng. Discussion on disaster prevention ventilation design for a curved road tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(2): 76 -83 .

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed