Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (3): 115-121    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.03.11
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
粉质黏土地层超大直径盾构掘进诱发地表变形智能预测研究
钟建敏1,张晓平2*,张亮亮3,吴柯2,唐少辉4,鲁婧轲2,陈鹏5,游少强5
1.济南城市建设集团有限公司, 山东 济南 250014;2.武汉大学土木建筑工程学院 岩土与结构工程安全湖北省重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430072;3.中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430063;4.广西大学土木建筑工程学院, 广西 南宁 530004;5.中铁十四局集团大盾构工程有限公司, 江苏 南京 211899
Research on intelligent prediction of surface deformation induced by super-large diameter shield tunneling in silty clay ground
Zhong Jianmin1, Zhang Xiaoping2*, Zhang Liangliang3, Wu Ke2, Tang Shaohui4, Lu Jingke2, Chen Peng5, You Shaoqiang5
1. Urban Construction Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Safety for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering of Hubei Province, School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China;
3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China;
4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China;
5. Large Diameter Shield Engineering Co., Ltd., China Railway 14th Bureau Group, Nanjing 211899, Jiangsu, China
下载:  PDF (4944KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为精准感知粉质黏土地层超大直径盾构掘进诱发的地表变形情况,有效控制开挖面前方地表变形风险,本研究考虑地层厚度和隧道埋深等因素,对土体物理力学参数进行修正;采用MATLAB软件建立反向传播(back propagation, BP)神经网络、支持向量机(support vector machine, SVM)和随机森林(random forest, RF)3种地表变形预测模型;并通过交叉验证法、网格搜索法和经验公式确定地表变形预测模型的最优超参数组合。依托济南黄河济泺路粉质黏土地层超大直径隧道工程,对盾构掘进诱发地表变形进行智能预测分析,并采用均方误差(mean square error, EMS)、均方根误差(root mean square error, ERMS)、平均绝对值误差(mean absolute error, EMA)和决定系数(coefficient of determination, R2)对预测结果的准确性进行评价。研究结果表明,随机森林模型预测误差最小,BP模型预测误差次之,支持向量机模型预测误差最大且泛化能力相对较弱。相关研究成果可为类似工程地质条件下超大直径盾构掘进诱发地表变形智能预测提供借鉴参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
钟建敏
张晓平
张亮亮
吴柯
唐少辉
鲁婧轲
陈鹏
游少强
关键词:  盾构隧道  地表变形  机器学习  预测模型    
Abstract: To accurately predict surface deformation induced by super-large-diameter shield tunneling in silty clay, an intelligent prediction model based on machine learning was developed. The physical and mechanical parameters of the soil were corrected by considering stratum thickness and tunnel burial depth. Three surface-deformation prediction models, namely, a back-propagation(BP)neural network, a support vector machine(SVM), and a random forest(RF), were established in MATLAB. The optimum hyperparameter combinations were determined by cross-validation, grid search, and empirical formulas. Using data from the Jiluo Road Yellow River Tunnel in Jinan, the surface deformation induced by shield tunneling was predicted. Model accuracy was evaluated using mean square error(EMS), root mean square error(ERMS), mean absolute error(EMA), and the coefficient of determination(R2). The results showed that the RF model produced the smallest prediction error, followed by the BP neural-network model, whereas the SVM model produced the largest error and had relatively weak generalization ability. The proposed model provided a reference for predicting surface deformation induced by super-large-diameter shield tunneling under similar engineering-geological conditions.
Key words:  shield TBM    surface deformation    machine learning    prediction model
发布日期:  2026-10-12     
中图分类号:  U456.3  
  TU45  
基金资助: 济南城市建设集团有限公司科技开发计划项目(2020W003);中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司科技研究项目(TSYSDY-JLLCHSD[2020]-04)
作者简介:  钟建敏(1987— ),男,山东济南人,工程师,主要研究方向为工程管理. E-mail:649854249@ qq.com. *通信作者简介:张晓平(1982— ),男,江西九江人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为地下工程、岩土力学以及工程地质. E-mail:jxhkzhang@163.com
引用本文:    
钟建敏,张晓平,张亮亮,吴柯,唐少辉,鲁婧轲,陈鹏,游少强. 粉质黏土地层超大直径盾构掘进诱发地表变形智能预测研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 115-121.
Zhong Jianmin, Zhang Xiaoping, Zhang Liangliang, Wu Ke, Tang Shaohui, Lu Jingke, Chen Peng, You Shaoqiang. Research on intelligent prediction of surface deformation induced by super-large diameter shield tunneling in silty clay ground. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(3): 115-121.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I3/115
[1] 王振峰. 卵石地层中地铁隧道盾构施工引起的地表沉降研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2013: 1-6. Wang Zhenfeng. Study on ground surface settlement due to metro shield[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2013: 1-6.
[2] 唐少辉, 张晓平, 刘浩, 等. 复杂地层水下盾构隧道工程难点及关键技术研究与展望[J]. 工程地质学报, 2021, 29(5): 1477-1487. Tang Shaohui, Zhang Xiaoping, Liu Hao, et al. Engineering difficulties and key technologies for underwater shield tunnel in complex ground[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2021, 29(5): 1477-1487.
[3] 赵辰洋, 罗毛毛, 邱静怡, 等. 盾构隧道施工引起地层变形预测方法综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 31-46. Zhao Chenyang, Luo Maomao, Qiu Jingyi, et al. Prediction of shield tunnelling induced ground movements: the state-of-the-art[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 31-46.
[4] 丁智, 李鑫家, 张霄. 基于机器学习的盾构掘进地表变形预测研究与展望[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2022, 4(3): 1-9. Ding Zhi, Li Xinjia, Zhang Xiao. Research and prospect of surface deformation prediction of shield tunneling based on machine learning[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(3): 1-9.
[5] Chen Weizhong, Tan Xuyuan, Yang Jianping. Review of state-of-the-art in structural health monitoring of tunnel engineering[J]. Smart Underground Engineering, 2025, 1(1): 40-50.
[6] Liu Xian, Gu Kejie, Zhang Baichuan, et al. Automated quantification of longitudinal joint opening in shield tunnels using enhanced multi-modal YOLO and laser scanning[J]. Smart Underground Engineering, 2025, 1(2): 113-134.
[7] Suwansawat S, Einstein H H. Artificial neural networks for predicting the maximum surface settlement caused by EPB shield tunneling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006, 21(2): 133-150.
[8] Chen R P, Zhang P, Kang X, et al. Prediction of maximum surface settlement caused by earth pressure balance(EPB)shield tunneling with ANN methods[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2019, 59(2): 284-295.
[9] 崔童. 大直径泥水平衡盾构施工过程中地层变形特征及地表沉降预测研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2019: 65-74. Cui Tong. Study on deformation characteristics and surface settlement prediction of large slurry balance shield during construction[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2019: 65-74.
[10] Wang Y H, Zhao X Y, Wang B T. LS-SVM and Monte Carlo methods based reliability analysis for settlement of soft clayey foundation[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 5(4): 312-317.
[11] 李方毅, 张晓平, 许丹, 等. 基于支持向量机的气压辅助掘进条件下盾构隧道地表变形预测研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(7): 1159-1165. Li Fangyi, Zhang Xiaoping, Xu Dan, et al. Prediction of surface deformation of a shield tunnel using air pressure-assisted tunneling based on support vector machine[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(7): 1159-1165.
[12] Dindarloo S R, Siami-Irdemoosa E. Maximum surface settlement based classification of shallow tunnels in soft ground[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 49: 320-327.
[13] 刘凯. 随机森林自适应特征选择和参数优化算法研究[D]. 长春: 长春工业大学, 2018: 22-29. Liu Kai. Research on adaptive feature selection and parameter optimization algorithm for random forest[D]. Changchun: Changchun University of Technology, 2018: 22-29.
[14] Ahangari K, Moeinossadat S R, Behnia D. Estimation of tunnelling-induced settlement by modern intelligent methods[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2015, 55(4): 737-748.
[15] 吴柯, 张晓平, 刘浩, 等. 粉质黏土地层超大直径泥水盾构隧道地表变形与施工参数相关关系研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2021, 29(5): 1555-1566. Wu Ke, Zhang Xiaoping, Liu Hao, et al. Correlation between surface deformation and construction parameters in silty clay ground tunneling with super large diameter slurry shield tbm[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2021, 29(5): 1555-1566.
[16] 陈仁朋, 戴田, 张品, 等. 基于机器学习算法的盾构掘进地表沉降预测方法[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(7): 111-118. Chen Renpeng, Dai Tian, Zhang Pin, et al. Prediction method of tunneling-induced ground settlement using machine learning algorithms[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2021, 48(7): 111-118.
[17] 杨益, 李兴高, 蒋兴起, 等. 粉质黏土地层盾构施工地表沉降关键参数分析与预测[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2021, 24(9): 98-103. Yang Yi, Li Xinggao, Jiang Xingqi, et al. Analysis and prediction of key parameters of ground surface settlements due to shield tunneling in silty clay stratum[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2021, 24(9): 98-103.
[18] 沈花玉, 王兆霞, 高成耀, 等. BP神经网络隐含层单元数的确定[J]. 天津理工大学学报, 2008, 24(5): 13-15. Shen Huayu, Wang Zhaoxia, Gao Chengyao, et al. Determining the number of BP neural network hidden layer units[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology, 2008, 24(5): 13-15.
[19] Breiman L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32.
[1] 孙文昊,许为民,何应道,历朋林,张锦程,张亮亮. 黄河中下游公铁合建盾构隧道设计关键技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 1-9.
[2] 赵世超,王剑宏,王超,鲁佳霖,杜昌言. 双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 23-30.
[3] 陈俊伟,施江杰,全良臣,张宇. 基于软硬件实时交互的大直径盾构隧道管片收敛变形监测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 45-55.
[4] 罗驰恒,郭元俊,贾瑶,姜学鹏. 盾构隧道疏散通道临界防烟风速计算模型研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 66-75.
[5] 周朋. 附加荷载下盾构隧道穿越软硬不均地层的变形及损伤演化规律[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 76-88.
[6] 董瑞兴,李杨,张东,王利民,马千里,赵洪岩,董宏宇. 卵漂石地层盾构隧道漂石滞排对地表沉降影响试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 102-116.
[7] 马超, 乔法宇, 王国盛, 梁靖宇, 路德春. FRCM加固盾构隧道管片接头提升结构整体力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 22-31.
[8] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[9] 钟浩,蔡先庆,孙浩,孔庆轩,张永平. 温度影响下砂岩三轴压缩行为:加荷特性、剪切变形及预测软件研发[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 81-95.
[10] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 于永堂, 朱才辉. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[11] 孙超, 张光伟, 答武强, 余祖峰. 临山条件下大直径盾构隧道抗浮控制技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 27-37.
[12] 赵泽乾, 朱旻, 包小华, 杨春山, 陈湘生. 下穿码头危化品堆场的超大直径盾构隧道抗爆性能评估方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 61-71.
[13] 苏国君,龚秋明,周小雄,吴伟锋,陈培新. 基于皮带出渣图像识别渣土含水率区间[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 73-81.
[14] 王宏超,胡军,周永强,付晓东. 二次衬砌施作时机对盾构隧道纵向力学性能的影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 99-112.
[15] 闫治国, 王紫锐, 沈奕, 刘康. 碳氢曲线下大直径盾构隧道结构热力特性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 25-36.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn