Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制
丁建奇1、王陈成2、朱向闪1、张翔1、傅刚1、徐敬民2*
(1.江苏省铁路集团有限公司 江苏省智能与绿色铁路工程研究中心,江苏南京 210049
2.东南大学交通学院,江苏南京 211189)
Influence mechanism of large diameter tunnel construction on adjacent buildings
DING Jianqi1, WANG Chencheng2, ZHU Xiangshan1, ZHANG Xiang1, FU Gang1, XU Jingmin2*#br#
(1.Jiangsu Intelligent and Green Railway Engineering Research Center, Jiangsu Railway Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210049, Jiangsu, China;
2.School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China)
下载:  PDF (4555KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本研究基于上元门过江隧道所穿越的江南段区域建筑实际工况,建立三维数值模拟有限元模型,通过位移控制法模拟隧道施工后逐步产生地层损失的过程,并在模拟完成后提取土体与框架结构的沉降与水平位移,以及框架结构各隔间的位移与应变,分析大直径隧道施工引起的框架结构的位移与应变分布和发展规律。研究表明:建筑框架结构板基础沉降随与隧道中轴线距离增大而减小,水平位移则近似保持在稳定值,小于基础下地层水平位移;框架结构的水平位移分布规律与隧道穿越关系有关,被隧道正穿的建筑上部水平位移小于下部,被隧道侧穿的建筑上部水平位移大于下部,而框架结构沉降则在竖直方向上变化幅度相对较小;框架结构隔间总竖直位移随隧道体积损失率增大而增大,且主要由剪切位移组成;剪切应变也随隧道体积损失率增大而增大,且被隧道下穿的建筑或距离隧道较近的侧穿建筑剪切应变一般较大,同时对于多隔间下穿建筑,剪切应变沿隔间变化曲线近似为正余弦曲线。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词:  隧道工程  建筑变形  数值模拟  地表移动    
Abstract: This research was based on the actual working conditions of buildings in the Jiangnan section crossed by the Shangyuanmen Cross River Tunnel. A three-dimensional numerical simulation finite element model was established to simulate the gradual formation loss process after tunnel construction through displacement control method. After the simulation was completed, the settlement and horizontal displacement of the soil and frame structure, as well as the displacement and strain of each compartment of the frame structure, were extracted to analyze the displacement and strain distribution and development law of the frame structure caused by large-diameter tunnel construction. Research hadshown that the settlement of the foundation of building frame structural plates decreases with increasing distance from the tunnel axis, while the horizontal displacement remained approximately at a stable value, which was smaller than the horizontal displacement of the underlying strata; The horizontal displacement distribution law of the frame structure was related to the tunnel crossing relationship. The horizontal displacement of the upper part of the building directly penetrated by the tunnel was smaller than that of the lower part, and the horizontal displacement of the upper part of the building laterally penetrated by the tunnel was larger than that of the lower part. However, the settlement of the frame structure changed relatively little in the vertical direction; The total vertical displacements of frame structure compartments increased with the increase of tunnel volume loss rate, and was mainly composed of shear displacement; The shear strain also increased  with the increase of the volume loss rate of the tunnel, and the shear strain of buildings that were penetrated by the tunnel or buildings that were close to the tunnel were generally larger. At the same time, for multi compartment penetrating buildings, the shear strain along the compartment variation curve approximated a sine cosine curve.
Key words:  tunnel engineering    building deformation    numerical simulation    ground settlement
收稿日期:  2024-12-15      修回日期:  2025-03-04      发布日期:  2025-03-12     
中图分类号:  U43  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52108364, 52478389);江苏省交通运输科技资助项目(2023G08)
通讯作者:  徐敬民(1992—),男,河南永城人,讲师,硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为隧道施工灾害防控与风险评估。 E-mail: jingmin_xu@seu.edu.cn   
作者简介:  丁建奇(1965—),男,江苏常州人,正高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为隧道与铁道工程。 E-mail: 1510189685@qq.com
引用本文:    
丁建奇、王陈成、朱向闪、张翔、傅刚、徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
DING Jianqi, WANG Chencheng, ZHU Xiangshan, ZHANG Xiang, FU Gang, XU Jingmin. Influence mechanism of large diameter tunnel construction on adjacent buildings. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-13.
链接本文:  
[1] 王圣涛, 陈鹏涛, 刘爱武, 孙文昊, 张俊儒. 特大跨连续变断面隧道双导洞超前-中柱反向扩挖的施工力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 1-11.
[2] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 杨家伟, 蔡遵乐. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[3] 赵泽乾, 朱旻, 包小华, 杨春山, 陈湘生. 下穿码头危化品堆场的超大直径盾构隧道抗爆性能评估方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 61-71.
[4] 纪禄凌,游玮,李晓逸,曾原驰,刘毓氚,张铠. 增设压力阀对隧道防排水影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 92-102.
[5] 杨立,夏增选,娄文杰,刘杉,李奉庭,武科. 山区深埋公路隧道穿越断层破碎带施工稳定性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 32-42.
[6] 闫治国, 王紫锐, 沈奕, 刘康. 碳氢曲线下大直径盾构隧道结构热力特性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 25-36.
[7] 田瑞端,莫冠旺,李响. 超大断面扁平结构隧道矿山法超欠挖优化控制研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 84-98.
[8] 刘向阳,罗兵兵,吴静,张学富,黄耀明,李林杰. 高地温施工隧道冰块与通风组合降温效果对比研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 66-75.
[9] 黄震,叶张骞,张嘉伟,彭子茂,严展硕. 膨胀型防火涂料对装配式框架隧道耐火性影响[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 46-58.
[10] 彭益, 张文, 王汉勋, 张彬, 孙哲. 某海岛地下水封油库渗流场数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(1): 94-104.
[11] 张宁, 黄新杰, 王川, 徐彬, 张建成, 张波. 高压水射流切割混凝土试验与数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(4): 47-56.
[12] 王伟, 刘英, 庄海洋, 赵凯, 陈国兴. 考虑内部结构的大直径盾构隧道抗震性能[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(3): 78-85.
[13] 孙港, 王军祥, 孟祥竹, 郭连军, 孙杰. 基于近场动力学理论的岩石双孔爆破动态断裂行为数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(2): 42-58.
[14] 黄兴, 张炜, 殷建钢, 施皓, 张晓磊. 填埋场扩建后下穿隧道结构的安全性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 55-63.
[15] 赵兴东, 窦翔, 李勇, 王立君. 基于Ventsim的地下水封洞库建造期通风方式优选[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2023, 5(1): 8-17.
[1] GUAN Zhenchang, ZHOU Yuxuan, LÜ Chunbo, LÜ Lixuan. The refined numerical simulation for the periphery hole blasting with air-deck charge[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(4): 11 -19 .
[2] ZHANG Liangliang. Field fire test on smoke flow characteristics of V-slope tunnel with longitudinal smoke exhaust[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 71 -79 .
[3] YANG Jihua, YAN Changbin, QI Sanhong, GUO Weixin, YANG Fengwei. Comprehensive treatments of double shield TBM construction in adverse geological sections[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 59 -70 .
[4] HUANG Fu, SHEN Yongbin, ZHANG Min, WANG Yongtao, YANG Yunqiang, ZHU Rui. Model test study on surface collapse induced by underground excavation disturbance based on PIV technique[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -10 .
[5] MA Hongling, LIANG Xiaopeng, ZHAO Kai, SHI Xilin, MA Huaxing, MO Lei, YANG Chunhe. Geological feasibility analysis of Tai'an salt cavern gas storage in Shandong Province[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2022, 4(2): 19 -27 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn