Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测
赵世超1,2,王剑宏1,3*,王超1,4,鲁佳霖1,杜昌言1,4
(1.山东大学齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南250002;2.济南城市建设集团有限公司 山东 济南 250014;
3.早稻田大学理工研究院,东京1698555;4.中铁十四局集团大盾构工程有限公司,江苏 南京 211899 )
Analysis of settlement deformation during twin large-diameter tunnel construction
Zhao Shichao1,2,Wang Jianhong1,3*,Wang Chao1,4,Lu Jialin1,Du Changyan1,4
(1.Shandong University,Jinan 250002,Shandong, China;
2.Jinan City Construction Group,Jinan 250014, Shandong,China;
3.Waseda University, Tokyo 1698555, Japan;
4.China Railway 14th Bureau Group Mega Shield Construction Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Nanjing 211899,Jiangsu,China )
下载:  PDF (3819KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为研究大直径泥水盾构双线下穿铁路堤坝施工沉降问题,探讨盾构下穿施工过程中铁路的沉降变形规律,本研究依托济南市济泺路穿黄北延隧道工程开展相关研究。综合利用数值模拟、理论分析与现场监测手段,具体设置并分析15%、20%、25%等3种不同应力释放率的工况开展分析。研究结果表明:铁路的沉降量总体与应力释放率呈正相关关系,但在铁路中心处该相关性减弱甚至局部呈相反趋势;地面沉降是由盾构穿越前后整个过程中逐渐积累形成的,沉降变化最大的阶段发生在盾构穿越前后10~20环之间;通过构建地层体积损失与应力释放的关系,对比Peck理论与数值模拟沉降规律,发现数值分析所得的沉降预测结果整体大于现场实际监测数据。基于上述结果得出结论,本研究所采用的模型与分析方法具备一定的安全富裕度,能够为安全预测大直径泥水盾构施工沉降风险提供有力的分析工具。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵世超
王剑宏
王超
鲁佳霖
杜昌言
关键词:  盾构施工  沉降分析  数值模拟  应力释放  地层损失    
Abstract: To investigate the construction settlement issue of a twin-tube, large-diameter slurry shield tunnel crossing beneath a railway embankment, and to explore the settlement and deformation patterns of the railway during the shield undercrossing process, relevant research was conducted based on the Northern Extension Project of the Jiluo Road Crossing the Yellow River Tunnel in Jinan. In terms of research methods, numerical simulation, theoretical analysis, and field monitoring were comprehensively utilized. The stress release method was adopted for the numerical analysis, and three working conditions with stress release rates of 15%, 20%, and 25% were established and analyzed. It was shown by the results that the railway settlement was generally positively correlated with the stress release rate; however, this correlation was weakened, and an opposite trend was even locally exhibited at the center of the railway. The ground settlement was observed to gradually accumulate throughout the entire process before and after the shield crossing, and the stage with the maximum settlement variation was observed between 10 and 20 rings before and after the shield passage. Furthermore, by establishing the relationship between stratum volume loss and stress release, the settlement patterns obtained by Peck's formula and numerical simulation were compared. It was found that the settlement prediction results obtained by numerical analysis were generally greater than those obtained from actual field monitoring. Based on the above results, it was concluded that the model and analysis method adopted in this study had a certain safety margin and could provide a powerful analytical tool for the safety prediction of settlement risks during large-diameter slurry shield construction.
Key words:  shield tunneling    settlement analysis    numerical simulation    stress release;ground loss
收稿日期:  2026-04-20      修回日期:  2026-04-29      发布日期:  2026-09-14     
中图分类号:  U456.3  
  TU433  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52130808)
通讯作者:  王剑宏(1975—),男,山东菏泽人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为城市基础设施的建设与运维。    E-mail:  j.h.wang@sdu.edu.cn
作者简介:  赵世超(1980—),男,山东日照人,正高级工程师,主要研究方向为路桥建设与管理。E-mail:15005311600@163.com
引用本文:    
赵世超, 王剑宏, 王超, 鲁佳霖, 杜昌言. 双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
Zhao Shichao, Wang Jianhong, Wang Chao, Lu Jialin, Du Changyan. Analysis of settlement deformation during twin large-diameter tunnel construction. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-8.
链接本文:  
[1] 仝跃, 朱子越, 陈俊武, 张东明, 张伟. 无中导连拱隧道施工力学性态分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 43-58.
[2] 郭军浩,颜梦瑶,李杰,周雷,赵兴,黄阜,任子衡. 基于VMD-CNN-BiLSTM模型与注意力机制融合的盾构施工诱发地表沉降时序预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 88-98.
[3] 靳高汉,高成路,周宗青,涂汉臣,王迪军,张志良,袁泉,李萧翰. 多层地铁车站水淹过程时空演化特征数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 53-64.
[4] 张小龙,郭明耀,向宇. 大断面竖井二次衬砌满堂支架设计及稳定性分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 124-134.
[5] 王雁冰, 张芳平, 李守业, 彭会椿, 雷振. 三向围压与液氧爆破荷载耦合作用下红砂岩损伤破裂特征研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 58-71.
[6] 金阳,姚颖康,刘汶,姬付全,曹昂. 不耦合偏心装药孔壁压力与岩体动态响应特性数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 83-92.
[7] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[8] 丁建奇, 王陈成, 朱向闪, 张翔, 傅刚, 徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
[9] 苟晓军, 赵金泉, 季玮, 花晓鸣, 范占锋. 隧道不良地质构造雷达特征数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 68-82.
[10] 赵旭明, 雷文君, 蔡明庆, 邰传民, 张林华. 观光隧道烟气流动特性研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 90-98.
[11] 王圣涛, 陈鹏涛, 刘爱武, 孙文昊, 张俊儒. 特大跨连续变断面隧道双导洞超前-中柱反向扩挖的施工力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 1-11.
[12] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 杨家伟, 蔡遵乐. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[13] 赵泽乾, 朱旻, 包小华, 杨春山, 陈湘生. 下穿码头危化品堆场的超大直径盾构隧道抗爆性能评估方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 61-71.
[14] 杨立,夏增选,娄文杰,刘杉,李奉庭,武科. 山区深埋公路隧道穿越断层破碎带施工稳定性[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(3): 32-42.
[15] 田瑞端,莫冠旺,李响. 超大断面扁平结构隧道矿山法超欠挖优化控制研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(2): 84-98.
[1] QIAN Qihu. Scientific use of the urban underground space to construction the harmonious livable and beautiful city[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(1): 1 -7 .
[2] ZHANG Ning, HUANG Xinjie, WANG Chuan, XU Bin, ZHANG Jiancheng, ZHANG Bo. Experimental and numerical simulation of high-pressure water jet cutting concrete[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 47 -56 .
[3] WANG Lichuan , HE Weiguo, ZHANG Junru , WU Hongbin , JIANG Xinqiang , ZHANG Huijian , WANG Wen , HUANG Linxiang. Application of the steel pipe pile arch cover method in large-span underground metro stations in weak and fragmented rock strata[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -14 .
[4] LIU Dewei. TBM tunnel surrounding rock excavability analysis based on excavation parameters and muck characteristics[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -9 .
[5] LI Hang. Application of 3D laser scanning for deformation monitoring in large deformation tunnels[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(4): 115 -123 .
[6] WANG Jingkui, PENG Jianyu, WANG Zhechao, LI Kanglin. The influence of blasting vibration of extended cavern on the stability of operating cavern[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(1): 36 -44 .
[7] RUAN Quanquan, ZHANG Wen, ZHANG Bin, WANG Qikuan, WANG Hanxun, SHI Guangsheng. Thermal and mechanical characteristics analysis of lined high pressure gas storage with different cavern spacing[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(1): 73 -83 .
[8] FAN Chuangang, SHENG Ziqiong, XIONG Sheng, LUAN Die. Experimental study on smoke movement and stratification characteristics of tunnel fire under the effect of rainfall and longitudinal ventilation[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(2): 37 -45 .
[9] Gou Xiaojun, Zhao Jinquan, Ji Wei, Hua Xiaoming, fan zhanfeng. Numerical simulation of radar characteristics of adverse geological structures in tunnels[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -19 .
[10] WANG Dongwei, HE Weiguo, DAI Xin, TIAN Feng, CHEN Yang. Exploration of rescue evacuation and ventilation technology for deep buried combined construction method subsea railway tunnel[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1 -12 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn