Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (3): 23-30    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.03.03
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测
赵世超1,2,王剑宏1,3*,王超1,4,鲁佳霖1,杜昌言1,4
1.山东大学齐鲁交通学院, 山东 济南 250002;2.济南城市建设集团有限公司, 山东 济南 250014;3.早稻田大学理工研究院, 日本 东京 1698555;4.中铁十四局集团大盾构工程有限公司, 江苏 南京 211899
Prediction of settlement during construction of twin large-diameter shield tunnels
Zhao Shichao1,2, Wang Jianhong1,3*, Wang Chao1,4, Lu Jialin1, Du Changyan1,4
1. School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250002, Shandong, China;
2. Jinan City Construction Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
3. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 1698555, Japan;
4. China Railway 14th Bureau Group Mega Shield Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211899, Jiangsu, China
下载:  PDF (9928KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为研究大直径泥水盾构双线下穿铁路堤坝施工沉降问题,探讨盾构下穿施工过程中铁路的沉降变形规律,本研究依托济南市济泺路穿黄北延隧道工程开展相关研究。综合利用数值模拟、理论分析与现场监测手段,具体设置15%、20%、25%等3种不同应力释放率的工况并开展分析。研究结果表明:铁路的沉降量总体与应力释放率呈正相关关系,但在铁路中心处该相关性减弱甚至局部呈相反趋势;地面沉降是由盾构穿越前后整个过程中逐渐积累形成的,沉降变化最大的阶段发生在盾构穿越前后10~20环之间;通过构建地层体积损失与应力释放的关系,对比Peck理论与数值模拟沉降规律,发现数值分析所得的沉降预测结果整体大于现场实际监测数据。基于上述结果得出结论,本研究所采用的模型与分析方法具备一定的安全富裕度,能够为安全预测大直径泥水盾构施工沉降风险提供有力的分析工具。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
赵世超
王剑宏
王超
鲁佳霖
杜昌言
关键词:  盾构隧道  沉降分析  数值模拟  应力释放  地层损失    
Abstract: To investigate the construction settlement issue of a twin-tube, large-diameter slurry shield tunnel crossing beneath a railway embankment, and to explore the settlement and deformation patterns of the railway during the shield undercrossing process, relevant research was conducted based on the Northern Extension Project of the Jiluo Road Crossing the Yellow River Tunnel in Jinan. In terms of research methods, numerical simulation, theoretical analysis, and field monitoring were comprehensively utilized. The stress release method was adopted for the numerical analysis, and three working conditions with stress release rates of 15%, 20%, and 25% were established and analyzed. It was shown by the results that the railway settlement was generally positively correlated with the stress release rate; however, this correlation was weakened, and an opposite trend was even locally exhibited at the center of the railway. The ground settlement was observed to gradually accumulate throughout the entire process before and after the shield crossing, and the stage with the maximum settlement variation was observed between 10 and 20 rings before and after the shield passage. Furthermore, by establishing the relationship between stratum volume loss and stress release, the settlement patterns obtained by Peck's formula and numerical simulation were compared. It was found that the settlement prediction results obtained by numerical analysis were generally greater than those obtained from actual field monitoring. Based on the above results, it was concluded that the model and analysis method adopted in this study had a certain safety margin and could provide a powerful analytical tool for the safety prediction of settlement risks during large-diameter slurry shield construction.
Key words:  shield tunneling    settlement analysis    numerical simulation    stress release    ground loss
发布日期:  2026-10-12     
中图分类号:  U456.3  
  TU433  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52130808)
作者简介:  赵世超(1980— ),男,山东日照人,正高级工程师,主要研究方向为路桥建设与管理. E-mail:15005311600@163.com. *通信作者简介:王剑宏(1975— ),男,山东菏泽人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为城市基础设施的建设与运维. E-mail:j.h.wang@sdu.edu.cn
引用本文:    
赵世超,王剑宏,王超,鲁佳霖,杜昌言. 双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 23-30.
Zhao Shichao, Wang Jianhong, Wang Chao, Lu Jialin, Du Changyan. Prediction of settlement during construction of twin large-diameter shield tunnels. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(3): 23-30.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I3/23
[1] Liu Xian, Gu Kejie, Zhang Baichuan, et al. Automated quantification of longitudinal joint opening in shield tunnels using enhanced multi-modal YOLO and laser scanning[J]. Smart Underground Engineering, 2025, 1(2): 113-134.
[2] 邹浩, 陈金国. 软土地区盾构下穿施工对铁路路基影响分析: 以杭州地铁2号线某区间现场监测为例[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2018, 38(2): 199-206. Zou Hao, Chen Jinguo. Analysis of influence of shield tunneling in soft soil on upper railway subgrade: a case study of site monitoring of a section on Hangzhou metro line No.2[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2018, 38(2): 199-206.
[3] 耿招, 孙光吉, 张世奇, 等. 盾构隧道下穿既有铁路稳定性分析[J]. 中外公路, 2020, 40(增刊2): 212-217. Geng Zhao, Sun Guangji, Zhang Shiqi, et al. Stability analysis of shield tunnel under existing railway[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2020, 40(S2): 212-217.
[4] 王东星. 黄土地区盾构下穿既有铁路风险及变形控制技术研究[J]. 安徽建筑, 2023, 30(9): 156-158. Wang Dongxing. Research on risk and deformation control technology of shield undercrossing existing railway in loess area[J]. Anhui Architecture, 2023, 30(9): 156-158.
[5] 杜明芳, 赵文才, 蒋敏敏. 盾构隧道下穿铁路箱涵引起轨道和地表沉降研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 39(2): 122-129. Du Mingfang, Zhao Wencai, Jiang Minmin. Study on track and surface settlement caused by shield tunnel passing through railway box culvert[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(2): 122-129.
[6] 林存刚. 盾构掘进地面隆陷及潮汐作用江底盾构隧道性状研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014: 205-209. Lin Cungang. Research on shield tunnelling-induced ground surface heave and subsidence and behavior of underwater shield-driven tunnels subject to tidal bores[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014: 205-209.
[7] 杜洪泽, 李守巨. 基于应力释放的盾构隧道开挖地表沉降分析[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(增刊1): 241-246. Du Hongze, Li Shouju. Analysis on surface settlement induced by shield tunneling based on stress release[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(S1): 241-246.
[8] 张振, 董亚博, 罗明福, 等. 盾构隧道施工对地表沉降的影响[J]. 土工基础, 2024, 38(5): 816-820. Zhang Zhen, Dong Yabo, Luo Mingfu, et al. Impact of shielded tunnel excavation on the ground subsidence[J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2024, 38(5): 816-820.
[9] 阮永芬, 邱龙, 槐以高, 等. 昆明湖相沉积地层Peck公式研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2024, 41(11): 66-73. Ruan Yongfen, Qiu Long, Huai Yigao, et al. Research on Peck formula for sedimentary strata of Kunming Lake[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2024, 41(11): 66-73.
[10] 齐永洁, 朱建才, 周建, 等. 土岩复合地层中盾构施工引起的地表位移预测[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(5): 1054-1062. Qi Yongjie, Zhu Jiancai, Zhou Jian, et al. Prediction of surface displacement caused by shield construction in soil-rock composite strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(5): 1054-1062.
[11] 郭耀耀, 周爱兆, 涂可诚, 等. 软土地层双线顶管施工地表沉降预测模型[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2026, 26(5): 2121-2129. Guo Yaoyao, Zhou Aizhao, Tu Kecheng, et al. Prediction model of surface settlement in double pipe jacking construction in soft soil stratum[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2026, 26(5): 2121-2129.
[12] 沈青松, 陈烨, 叶盛华, 等. 基于随机介质理论和Peck公式的矩形顶管地表沉降改进计算方法[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2025, 39(4): 504-510. Shen Qingsong, Chen Ye, Ye Shenghua, et al. Improved calculation method for settlement of rectangular pipe jacking based on random medium theory and Peck formula[J]. Geotechnical Engineering Technique, 2025, 39(4): 504-510.
[13] Peck R B. Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground[C] //Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Mexico City, Mexico: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering(ISSMGE), 1969: 225-290.
[14] Hansmire W H, Cording E J. Discussion of “subsidence over soft ground tunnel”[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1976, 102(3): 259-261.
[15] Nakamura H, Yamazaki I, Nakahiro T, et al. A design method for shield tunnel introducing the concept of stress release ratio[J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1999, 1999(638): 241-250.
[16] Kirsch E G.Die theorie der elastizität und die bedürfnisse der festigkeitslehre[J]. Zeitschrift des VereinesdeutscherIngenieure, 1898, 42(29): 797-807.
[1] 孙文昊,许为民,何应道,历朋林,张锦程,张亮亮. 黄河中下游公铁合建盾构隧道设计关键技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 1-9.
[2] 董瑞兴,李杨,张东,王利民,马千里,赵洪岩,董宏宇. 卵漂石地层盾构隧道漂石滞排对地表沉降影响试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 102-116.
[3] 马超, 乔法宇, 王国盛, 梁靖宇, 路德春. FRCM加固盾构隧道管片接头提升结构整体力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 22-31.
[4] 仝跃, 朱子越, 陈俊武, 张东明, 张伟. 无中导连拱隧道施工力学性态分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 43-58.
[5] 靳高汉,高成路,周宗青,涂汉臣,王迪军,张志良,袁泉,李萧翰. 多层地铁车站水淹过程时空演化特征数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 53-64.
[6] 张小龙,郭明耀,向宇. 大断面竖井二次衬砌满堂支架设计及稳定性分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 124-134.
[7] 王雁冰, 张芳平, 李守业, 彭会椿, 雷振. 三向围压与液氧爆破荷载耦合作用下红砂岩损伤破裂特征研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 58-71.
[8] 金阳,姚颖康,刘汶,姬付全,曹昂. 不耦合偏心装药孔壁压力与岩体动态响应特性数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 83-92.
[9] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[10] 丁建奇, 王陈成, 朱向闪, 张翔, 傅刚, 徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
[11] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 于永堂, 朱才辉. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[12] 苟晓军, 赵金泉, 季玮, 花晓鸣, 范占锋. 隧道不良地质构造雷达特征数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 68-82.
[13] 赵旭明, 雷文君, 蔡明庆, 邰传民, 张林华. 观光隧道烟气流动特性研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 90-98.
[14] 王圣涛, 陈鹏涛, 刘爱武, 孙文昊, 张俊儒. 特大跨连续变断面隧道双导洞超前-中柱反向扩挖的施工力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 1-11.
[15] 孙超, 张光伟, 答武强, 余祖峰. 临山条件下大直径盾构隧道抗浮控制技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 27-37.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn