Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
附加荷载下盾构隧道穿越软硬不均地层的变形及损伤演化规律
周朋
(1. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430063;
2. 水下隧道技术国家地方联合工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430063)
Deformation and damage evolution law of shield tunnels crossing soft-hard heterogeneous strata under additional loads
Zhou Peng
(1. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China; 
2. National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Underwater Tunnelling Technology, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China)
下载:  PDF (4809KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为揭示软硬不均地层条件下盾构隧道的纵向力学响应与损伤演化规律,以济南黄河济泺路隧道为工程背景,建立盾构隧道纵向三维精细化数值计算模型,基于衬砌整体损伤指标,研究河床淤积附加荷载作用下隧道的变形特征、损伤发展规律及破坏机制,并开展纵向残余顶推力和螺栓直径的参数敏感性分析。研究结果表明:软硬地层承载能力差异导致隧道在软硬交界面产生显著纵向不均匀变形,环缝呈现硬土侧张开、软土侧错台的特征,且变形随附加荷载增大而加剧;软硬交界面是结构变形与损伤最为敏感的区域,衬砌压缩损伤主要集中于交界面,拉伸损伤则主要分布于软土侧,管片环横向变形是诱发拉伸破坏的关键因素;纵向残余顶推力和螺栓直径均可提高隧道纵向刚度,但二者对结构响应的影响机制存在差异,其中纵向残余顶推力对变形控制和损伤演化的影响更为显著,其有利于减小纵向变形和环缝错台,但会加剧局部压缩损伤及软土侧拉伸损伤,而增大螺栓直径则有助于抑制管片横向变形并降低拉伸损伤。研究表明,软硬交界面是盾构隧道结构安全控制的关键部位,纵向残余顶推力是影响结构受力状态与损伤发展的重要因素。研究成果可为软硬不均地层盾构隧道的设计、施工及运营安全评估提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
周朋
关键词:  盾构隧道  软硬不均地层  纵向力学性能  数值模拟  损伤评价    
Abstract: To reveal the longitudinal mechanical response and damage evolution law of shield tunnels in soft-hard heterogeneous strata, a refined three-dimensional longitudinal numerical model was established based on the engineering background of the Jinan Yellow River Jiluo Road Tunnel. After an overall damage index for the tunnel lining was adopted, the deformation characteristics, damage evolution laws, and failure mechanisms of the tunnel under the additional loads induced by riverbed siltation were systematically investigated. In addition, parametric sensitivity analyses of the longitudinal residual jacking force and bolt diameter were carried out. The results indicated that significant longitudinal non-uniform deformation at the soft-hard stratum interface was induced by the bearing capacity difference between the soft and hard strata. Opening on the hard soil side and dislocation on the soft soil side were exhibited by the circumferential joints, and these structural deformations were aggravated as the additional loads increased. The soft-hard stratum interface was identified as the most sensitive zone for structural deformation and damage accumulation. The compressive damage of the lining was mainly concentrated at the stratum interface, while tensile damage was predominantly distributed on the soft soil side. The transverse deformation of segment rings was verified to be the key factor inducing tensile failure of the tunnel lining. The longitudinal stiffness of the tunnel could be improved by both the longitudinal residual jacking force and the bolt diameter, whereas distinct mechanisms of action on structural responses were observed. A more significant effect on deformation control and damage evolution was exerted by the longitudinal residual jacking force than by the bolt diameter. The longitudinal deformation and circumferential joint dislocation were found to be reduced by the longitudinal residual jacking force, whereas local compressive damage and tensile damage on the soft soil side were aggravated by it. By contrast, the transverse deformation of segments was effectively restrained, and tensile damage was reduced by the increase in bolt diameter. It was demonstrated that the soft-hard stratum interface was regarded as the critical position for the safety control of shield tunnel structures, and the longitudinal residual jacking force was identified as a vital factor affecting the structural stress state and damage development. A reliable reference for the design, construction, and operational safety assessment of shield tunnels in soft-hard heterogeneous strata could be provided by the research results.
Key words:  shield tunnel    soft-hard heterogeneous strata    longitudinal mechanical properties    numerical simulation    damage evaluation
收稿日期:  2026-04-20      修回日期:  2026-06-01      发布日期:  2026-09-14     
中图分类号:  U45  
  TU94  
基金资助: 济南城市建设集团有限公司科技开发计划资助项目(2020W003);中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司科技研究资助项目(TSYSDY-JLLCHSD[2020]-09)
作者简介:  周朋(1987—),男,湖南常德人,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程。E-mail:674835405@qq.com
引用本文:    
周朋. 附加荷载下盾构隧道穿越软硬不均地层的变形及损伤演化规律[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, .
Zhou Peng. Deformation and damage evolution law of shield tunnels crossing soft-hard heterogeneous strata under additional loads. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 0, (): 1-15.
链接本文:  
[1] 董瑞兴,李杨,张东,王利民,马千里,赵洪岩,董宏宇. 卵漂石地层盾构隧道漂石滞排对地表沉降影响试验研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(2): 102-116.
[2] 马超, 乔法宇, 王国盛, 梁靖宇, 路德春. FRCM加固盾构隧道管片接头提升结构整体力学行为[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 22-31.
[3] 仝跃, 朱子越, 陈俊武, 张东明, 张伟. 无中导连拱隧道施工力学性态分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 43-58.
[4] 靳高汉,高成路,周宗青,涂汉臣,王迪军,张志良,袁泉,李萧翰. 多层地铁车站水淹过程时空演化特征数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 53-64.
[5] 张小龙,郭明耀,向宇. 大断面竖井二次衬砌满堂支架设计及稳定性分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 124-134.
[6] 王雁冰, 张芳平, 李守业, 彭会椿, 雷振. 三向围压与液氧爆破荷载耦合作用下红砂岩损伤破裂特征研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 58-71.
[7] 金阳,姚颖康,刘汶,姬付全,曹昂. 不耦合偏心装药孔壁压力与岩体动态响应特性数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 83-92.
[8] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[9] 丁建奇, 王陈成, 朱向闪, 张翔, 傅刚, 徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
[10] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 于永堂, 朱才辉. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[11] 苟晓军, 赵金泉, 季玮, 花晓鸣, 范占锋. 隧道不良地质构造雷达特征数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 68-82.
[12] 赵旭明, 雷文君, 蔡明庆, 邰传民, 张林华. 观光隧道烟气流动特性研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 90-98.
[13] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 杨家伟, 蔡遵乐. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[14] 赵泽乾, 朱旻, 包小华, 杨春山, 陈湘生. 下穿码头危化品堆场的超大直径盾构隧道抗爆性能评估方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 61-71.
[15] 孙超, 张光伟, 答武强, 余祖峰. 临山条件下大直径盾构隧道抗浮控制技术[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 27-37.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn