Please wait a minute...
 
隧道与地下工程灾害防治  2026, Vol. 8 Issue (3): 157-162    DOI: 10.19952/j.cnki.2096-5052.2026.03.15
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
工作井基坑开挖及吊装全过程土体应力路径试验
王冬1,张中堃2*,刘燕3,张树明3,胡威东4,徐静1,李君瑶5,吕昌怀6,杨帆7
1. 济南城市建设集团有限公司, 山东 济南 250014;2. 济南建工集团有限公司, 山东 济南 250014; 3. 济南大学土木建筑学院, 山东 济南 250022;4. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430063;5. 山东省地质矿产勘查开发局第四地质大队, 山东 潍坊 261021;6. 中国电建集团江西省电力设计院有限公司, 江西 南昌 330096;7. 济南鼎汇土木工程技术有限公司, 山东 济南 250002
Soil stress path in the whole process of excavation and hoisting of working shaft in silty clay
Wang Dong1, Zhang Zhongkun2*, Liu Yan3, Zhang Shuming3, Hu Weidong4, Xu Jing1, Li Junyao5, Lü Changhuai6, Yang Fan7
1. Jinan City Construction Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
2. Jinan Construction Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China;
4. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China;
5. Fourth Geological Group of Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geological Mineral Exploration and Development, Weifang 261021, Shandong, China;
6. China Electric Power Engineering Consulting Group Jiangxi Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Nanchang 330096, Jiangxi, China;
7. Jinan Dinghui Civil Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan 250002, Shandong, China
下载:  PDF (2474KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为揭示盾构始发工作井基坑开挖与吊装施工中土体应力演化规律,明确主应力轴旋转对土体力学特性的影响,以济南市黄河隧道盾构始发工作井为工程背景开展研究。采用理论分析与应力路径三轴试验相结合的方法,确定不同区域土体应力路径边界条件,分析坑内外土体主应力演化与轴旋转特征。结果表明,引入大主应力偏转角α的p-q-α三维应力路径,相比传统仅考虑平均压应力p与广义剪应力q的二维描述,可更全面反映复杂施工工况下土体真实应力状态;基坑开挖阶段坑内土体以竖向卸荷为主,平均压应力降低、广义剪应力增大,大主应力轴阶跃式顺时针旋转近90°,旋转幅度随距基坑中心距离增大而衰减,空间效应显著;坑外土体以侧向卸荷为主,广义剪应力基本稳定,主应力轴旋转幅度较小;坑内主应力轴旋转引发的强度与刚度劣化效应需在基坑变形与稳定性分析中重点考虑,坑外可近似忽略。研究成果可为深基坑工程设计与安全管控提供理论支撑。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
王冬
张中堃
刘燕
张树明
胡威东
徐静
李君瑶
吕昌怀
杨帆
关键词:  基坑开挖  应力路径  数值模拟  主应力旋转  吊装荷载    
Abstract: A study was conducted to reveal the stress evolution law of soil during foundation pit excavation and hoisting construction of a shield launching shaft and clarify the influence of principal stress axis rotation on soil mechanical properties, with the shield launching shaft of Jinan Yellow River Tunnel taken as the engineering background. By adopting the method combining theoretical analysis and stress path triaxial tests, the stress path boundary conditions of soil in different regions were determined, and the principal stress evolution and axis rotation characteristics of soil inside and outside the foundation pit were analyzed. The results showed that, compared with the traditional two-dimensional description only considering the mean compressive stress p and generalized shear stress q, the real stress state of soil under complex construction conditions could be more comprehensively reflected by the three-dimensional p-q-α stress path incorporating the major principal stress deflection angle α. During foundation pit excavation, the soil inside the foundation pit was dominated by vertical unloading, with decreased mean compressive stress and increased generalized shear stress. The major principal stress axis was rotated clockwise by nearly 90° in a stepwise pattern, and the rotation amplitude was attenuated with increasing distance from the foundation pit center; a significant spatial effect was observed. The soil outside the foundation pit was dominated by lateral unloading, with relatively stable generalized shear stress and a small rotation amplitude of the principal stress axis. The strength and stiffness deterioration effects induced by principal stress axis rotation inside the foundation pit should be emphatically considered in the analysis of foundation pit deformation and stability, while those outside the foundation pit could be largely ignored. Theoretical support for the design and safety management of deep foundation pit engineering was provided by the research results.
Key words:  foundation pit excavation    stress path    numerical simulation    principal stress rotation    lifting load
发布日期:  2026-10-12     
中图分类号:  TU43  
  TU44  
基金资助: 济南城市建设集团有限公司科技开发计划资助项目(2020W003);中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司科技研究资助项目(TSYSDY-JLLCHSD[2020]-05)
作者简介:  王冬(1982— ),男,山东济南人,助理工程师,主要研究方向为土木工程与管理. E-mail:93147531@qq.com. *通信作者简介:张中堃(1978— ),男,山东肥城人,工程师,主要研究方向为隧道与地下工程. E-mail:m19707015772@163.com
引用本文:    
王冬,张中堃,刘燕,张树明,胡威东,徐静,李君瑶,吕昌怀,杨帆. 工作井基坑开挖及吊装全过程土体应力路径试验[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 157-162.
Wang Dong, Zhang Zhongkun, Liu Yan, Zhang Shuming, Hu Weidong, Xu Jing, Li Junyao, Lü Changhuai, Yang Fan. Soil stress path in the whole process of excavation and hoisting of working shaft in silty clay. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2026, 8(3): 157-162.
链接本文:  
http://tunnel.sdujournals.com/CN/Y2026/V8/I3/157
[1] 刘丽. 考虑开挖应力路径的基坑土体变形性状研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2016: 64-69. Liu Li. Study on deformation behavior of soil considering stress path during deep excavation[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016: 64-69.
[2] 孙岳崧, 濮家骝, 李信. 不同应力路径对砂土应力-应变关系影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1987, 9(6): 78-88.
[3] 李海波, 梁立孚, 陈德民. 考虑主应力轴旋转土体的应力增量分析[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2001, 22(4): 56-60. Li Haibo, Liang Lifu, Chen Demin. Analysis of stress increment considering rotation of principal stress axes of soil[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2001, 22(4): 56-60.
[4] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 等. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47. Li Zhang, Bai Sen, Zheng Jianguo, et al. The influence of foundation pit excavation on the surrounding soil pressure and deformation of existing shield tunnel in Xi'an loess stratum[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[5] 曾国熙, 潘秋元, 胡一峰. 软粘土地基基坑开挖性状的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1988, 10(3): 13-22. Zeng Guoxi, Pan Qiuyuan, Hu Yifeng. The behavior of excavation in soft clay ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 10(3): 13-22.
[6] 刘国彬, 侯学渊. 软土的卸荷模量[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1996, 18(6): 18-23. Liu Guobin, Hou Xueyuan. Unloading modulus of the Shanghai soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 18(6): 18-23.
[7] 吴宏伟, 施群. 深基坑开挖中的应力路径[J]. 土木工程学报, 1999, 32(6): 53-58. Ng Wangwai Charles, Shi Qun. Changes of stress path caused by stress relief during excavations[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1999, 32(6): 53-58.
[8] 袁静, 龚晓南. 基坑开挖过程中软土性状若干问题的分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2001, 35(5): 465-470. Yuan Jing, Gong Xiaonan. Analysis of soft clay during excavation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2001, 35(5): 465-470.
[9] 何世秀, 朱志政, 杨雪强. 基坑土体侧向卸荷真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(6): 869-872. He Shixiu, Zhu Zhizheng, Yang Xueqiang. A study of true triaxial test on lateral unloading of soil mass of foundation pit[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(6): 869-872.
[10] 应宏伟, 李晶, 谢新宇, 等. 考虑主应力轴旋转的基坑开挖应力路径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(4): 1013-1017. Ying Hongwei, Li Jing, Xie Xinyu, et al. Research on stress path during excavation considering rotation of principal stress axis[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(4): 1013-1017.
[11] 刘熙媛, 窦远明, 闫澍旺. 模拟基坑开挖过程的三轴试验研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2005, 33(5): 1-3. Liu Xiyuan, Dou Yuanming, Yan Shuwang. Study on triaxial tests for the simulation of excavation process[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2005, 33(5): 1-3.
[12] 杨雪强, 朱志政, 韩高升, 等. 不同应力路径下土体的变形特性与破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(12): 2181-2185. Yang Xueqiang, Zhu Zhizheng, Han Gaosheng, et al. Deformation and failure characteristics of soil mass under different stress paths[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(12): 2181-2185.
[13] 李宝平, 郭兴峰, 张玉, 等. 侧向卸荷条件下黄土的变形特性试验[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2018, 35(6): 87-93. Li Baoping, Guo Xingfeng, Zhang Yu, et al. Test on deformation characteristics of loess under lateral unloading condition[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2018, 35(6): 87-93.
[1] 赵世超,王剑宏,王超,鲁佳霖,杜昌言. 双线大直径盾构隧道施工沉降预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 23-30.
[2] 周朋. 附加荷载下盾构隧道穿越软硬不均地层的变形及损伤演化规律[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 76-88.
[3] 何家成,朱驰,傅金阳,孙前辉,李亚楠. 循环动载作用下盾构隧道变间距并行下穿既有公路隧道长期沉降研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(3): 102-114.
[4] 仝跃, 朱子越, 陈俊武, 张东明, 张伟. 无中导连拱隧道施工力学性态分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2026, 8(1): 43-58.
[5] 靳高汉,高成路,周宗青,涂汉臣,王迪军,张志良,袁泉,李萧翰. 多层地铁车站水淹过程时空演化特征数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 53-64.
[6] 张小龙,郭明耀,向宇. 大断面竖井二次衬砌满堂支架设计及稳定性分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(4): 124-134.
[7] 王雁冰, 张芳平, 李守业, 彭会椿, 雷振. 三向围压与液氧爆破荷载耦合作用下红砂岩损伤破裂特征研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 58-71.
[8] 金阳,姚颖康,刘汶,姬付全,曹昂. 不耦合偏心装药孔壁压力与岩体动态响应特性数值模拟研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(3): 83-92.
[9] 郭建光,王星,董唱唱,薛永斌,王双庆,赵宏硕,王涵,王文虎. 浆液时效性与管片摩擦作用下管片上浮研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(2): 73-80.
[10] 丁建奇, 王陈成, 朱向闪, 张翔, 傅刚, 徐敬民. 大直径隧道施工对临近建筑的作用机制[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 22-34.
[11] 李璋, 白森, 郑建国, 于永堂, 朱才辉. 基坑开挖对西安黄土地层中既有盾构隧道围岩压力及变形影响分析[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 35-47.
[12] 苟晓军, 赵金泉, 季玮, 花晓鸣, 范占锋. 隧道不良地质构造雷达特征数值模拟[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 68-82.
[13] 赵旭明, 雷文君, 蔡明庆, 邰传民, 张林华. 观光隧道烟气流动特性研究[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2025, 7(1): 90-98.
[14] 李启弟, 梁庆国, 周仁, 杨家伟, 蔡遵乐. 甘青隧道初始地应力场分析及岩爆预测[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 50-60.
[15] 赵泽乾, 朱旻, 包小华, 杨春山, 陈湘生. 下穿码头危化品堆场的超大直径盾构隧道抗爆性能评估方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(4): 61-71.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
网站版权 © 《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部
地址:山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B733《隧道与地下工程灾害防治》编辑部, 邮编:250100, 电话:0531-88366735, E-mail:tunnel@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn